Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Defence of India Rules, 1962

10 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SUSHIL KUMAR PORWAL AND ORS.versusVIPIN MANEKLAL AND ORS.

1987 INSC 23027 August 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the seizure of primary gold stored by the widow Ratanbai, who claimed it belonged to her late husband Kesharimal Porwal, while the true owners were his grandsons under a will. The Central Excise authorities confiscated the gold and imposed a penalty on Ratanbai for violating the Gold Control Ordinan

CHAMPALAL POONAJI SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1982 INSC 727 January 1982Dismissed

The petitioner was convicted by a Presidency Magistrate for offences under IPC 120B, the Customs Act and related rules and sentenced to imprisonment of two to four years with a fine. The High Court set aside the conviction, but the Supreme Court restored it. The petitioner had earlier been preventively detained under t

GUNWANTLAL GODAWATversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2017 INSC 113022 November 2017

In 1965 gold worth 240 kg was seized from the appellant's father's house under the Defence of India Rules, 1962 and confiscation proceedings were initiated. The Rules were later repealed by the Gold Control Ordinance, 1968, which was subsequently repealed by the Gold Control Act, 1968, creating a statutory fiction that

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusRAJA MOHAMMED AMIR MOHAMMAD KHAN

2005 INSC 51321 October 2005Dismissed

The respondent, an Indian citizen and sole heir of the late Raja of Mahmudabad, sought the return of properties that had been vested in the Custodian of Enemy Property after his father, a Pakistani citizen, migrated to Pakistan. The High Court held that the vesting was only for possession, management and control and or

H.S.S.K. NIYAMI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 24221 August 1990Dismissed

Two sugar factories in North Mysore challenged the constitutional validity of Section 3(3C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and a 1966 government notification that placed them in Zone 1 for sugar price fixation, alleging loss and denial of a notice‑hearing. The factories argued that the zoning violated their fun

VISHNU DAYAL JHUNJHUNWALA & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 8618 April 1984Dismissed

The appellant owned a sugar mill that had been permanently shut down before the Central Government issued an order under Rule 125A of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, taking over its management and appointing an authorised controller. The appellant argued that because the mill was closed and not engaged in production,

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusCHAMPALAL PUNJAJI SHAH

1981 INSC 14012 August 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra charged Champalal Punjaji Shah with criminal conspiracy under S.120B IPC, S.135 of the Customs Act and Defence of India Rules after gold bars with foreign markings were discovered in his flat. The trial was protracted, with the accused contributing to delays, and the High Court acquitted him, c

ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 40010 May 2024

Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, was arrested on 21 March 2024 by the Directorate of Enforcement in connection with alleged offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and related statutes. He challenged the arrest before the Supreme Court, arguing that the legality of his detention was sub judic

STATE OF MAHARASIITRAversusNATWARLAL DAMODARDAS SONI

1979 INSC 2584 December 1979Appeal(s) allowed

The Anti‑Corruption Bureau raided Natwarlal Damodardas Soni's residence and seized 100 gold biscuits of foreign origin concealed in a jacket; the Customs authorities subsequently took possession. Soni, who was absent at the time, was later convicted under sections 135(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Defence

STATE OF U.P.versusJAIRAM ETC.

1981 INSC 1951 December 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, detained under the Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, filed habeas corpus petitions in the Allahabad High Court. While the petitions were listed before a Division Bench, a single judge, after hearing counsel, granted them bail on the ground that the State Government had erred i

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search