Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 1972

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

PREM JEET KUMARversusSURENDER GANDOTRA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 21327 August 1991Dismissed

The appellant, a former president of Jupiter Cooperative Group Housing Society, was challenged for alleged irregularities in the purchase of building material by the past managing committee. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies referred the dispute to arbitration under Section 60 of the Delhi Co‑operative Societies A

SANT LAL GUPTA & ORS.versusMODERN COOP. GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

2010 INSC 70418 October 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, members of a Delhi cooperative housing society, were subject to a resolution for their expulsion which was sent to the Registrar of Co‑operative Societies for approval as required by the Delhi Co‑operative Societies Act, 1972 and Rules, 1973. The society delayed submitting its records for about seven ye

ISHWAR NAGAR CO-OP.HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETYversusPARMA NAND SHARMA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 78115 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Ishwar Nagar Cooperative Housing Society expelled Dr. Parmanand Sharma, a member since 1961, after he purchased a property in Delhi in the name of his Hindu Undivided Family. The Society relied on Rule 25(1)(c)(i) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 1973, which disqualifies members who own a residential house

HINDUSTAN COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.versusREGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ANR.

2009 INSC 16912 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Hindustan Co‑operative Housing Society rejected the transfer of membership from its former member Anoop Singh to his daughter Jasjit Kaur, citing the member's failure to furnish a required affidavit. Jasjit Kaur filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court seeking allotment of a plot or refund of monies

SUPREME CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETYversusM/S. H.S. NAG AND ASSOCIATES (P) LTD.

1996 INSC 6559 May 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Co‑operative Group Housing Society entered into a construction contract with H.S. Nag & Associates that contained an arbitration clause (clause 32). After additional towers were awarded, a dispute arose and the respondent filed an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to refer the matter

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search