Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Prashant Kumar Meena, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Special Judge (DDA Act) dated 12 November 2025, which dismissed his application for discharge in a case under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Delhi Development Authority Act. The petitioner argued that the …
The Supreme Court was asked to clarify its 10 May 1996 order directing H‑category hazardous industries in Delhi to surrender their land for green‑belt development. The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) sought directions on six specific issues, including the extent of land to be surrendered, the …
The Supreme Court was urged to enforce its May 10, 1996 order directing hazardous, noxious, heavy and large industries in Delhi to shift and surrender surplus land to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) without compensation. The petitioners argued that the earlier order implied acquisition under …
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) allotted 5,000 plots in Rohini, Delhi, but a stay ordered by the High Court on land acquisition delayed issuance of allotment letters. After the stay was vacated, the DDA recalculated plot costs using a cost‑of‑living index escalation of 16.62% per annum, …
The Supreme Court examined a report by former Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy investigating Delhi Development Authority (DDA) officials who allegedly colluded with Skipper Construction to hand over land possession without full auction payment and to allow construction, causing loss to the DDA and the …
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) auctioned a commercial tower plot and awarded it to Skipper Construction Ltd., which paid only 25% of the bid and later defaulted on the balance despite multiple extensions and court orders. Skipper repeatedly violated interim orders by seeking to create …
