Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Delhi Land Reforms Act

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S PAYAL VISION LTD.versusRADHIKA CHOUDHARY

2012 INSC 41320 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

M/S Payal Vision Ltd., the landlord, filed a suit for possession and mesne profits against Radhika Choudhary, the tenant, alleging a lease of Rs.50,000 per month and a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act terminating the tenancy due to unauthorized structural changes. The tenant contested the nature

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusRISHI RAJ JAIN AND ANR.

2006 INSC 61514 September 2006Disposed off

The respondent, owner of a 2.5‑acre farmhouse in the agricultural green belt of Delhi, constructed a dwelling house on the land. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) levied General Tax under Section 115 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, treating the entire farm as taxable. The High Court directed that f

AMAR SINGH JAGRAM (DEAD) BY LRS.versusCHANDGI S/O DEEP CHAND

1988 INSC 3402 November 1988Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from consolidation proceedings under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, where the landowner Chandgi was allotted substituted parcels of land and the tenants Amar Singh and Jagram, who had been non‑occupancy tenants of the original holding, were not given c

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search