Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Development Control Rules, 1967

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SURESH EST ATES PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORP. OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.

2007 INSC 130014 December 2007Case Partly allowed

The appellants, owners of an 8,983 sq.m. plot in Mumbai, sought permission to develop a luxury hotel with additional floor space index (FSI) under Rule 10(2) of the Development Control Rules, 1967. The land fell within Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) II as per the 19 February 1991 notification issued under the Environmen

LAXMINARAYAN R. BHATTAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2003 INSC 2184 April 2003Dismissed

The appellants' original land was acquired under a Town Planning Scheme and they were awarded two final plots and monetary compensation by an arbitrator. They later sought additional Floor Space Index (FSI) and Transferable Development Rights (TDR) under the 1991 Development Control Regulations, which allowed such bene

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search