Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Domestic Violence Act, 2005

13 judgments · newest first · showing 1–13

SMT. SHARDA VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sharda Verma, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the High Court's intervention to expedite the hearing of her matrimonial case (No. 2301/2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (S.D.), Kanpur Nagar, which involves claims under …

DOLAN ACHARYAversusSNEHASIS RASHBIHARI BATABYAL

Disposed Off

The High Court examined a dispute over custody of a 14‑year‑old son between his parents after a series of consent‑decree arrangements under the Special Marriage Act. The mother sought modification of the consent order to obtain joint parenting, while the father contested the modification, arguing no …

AVISHEK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Avishek Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a Session Court order dated 10 December 2025 that arose from a criminal appeal and a domestic‑violence proceeding. The order under challenge was based on Section 19(1) of the Domestic Violence …

VIBHORE KUMAR RASTOGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Vibhore Kumar Rastogi filed a criminal revision challenging a judgment of the Judicial Magistrate dated 10 September 2025 under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act. The revisionist sought condonation of a 70‑day delay in filing the revision and later requested to withdraw the revision in favour …

MANISHABEN VIJAYBHAI SHAH W/O BHAVESHBHAI RAMNIKLAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, married to respondent No.2, was driven out of her matrimonial home in 2007 and later filed maintenance proceedings under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act and Section 125 of the CrPC. The Family Court ordered the respondent to pay Rs.15,000 per month from the date of the …

NISHA DEEPAK SHARMAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The appellants, who were charged under Sections 504, 506 read with 34 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v)(a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, sought anticipatory bail. The Special Court rejected their pre‑arrest bail applications, …

Rohan Anant PakhurdeversusMadhura Mohan Rane

Rejected

The husband filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of domestic violence (DV) proceedings, filed by his wife before a Metropolitan Magistrate, to the Family Court where his divorce suit was pending. The applicant’s counsel initially claimed the wife worked in Bangalore, later …

RAJENDRA PRASAD SAO @ RAJENDRA PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Rajendra Prasad and Meena Devi, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 21‑06‑2019 of the Judicial Magistrate‑Ist Class, Begusarai, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Domestic Violence Act against …

MADDURI GANGARAJU @ BABU RAOversusMADDURI SUNANDA & OTHERS

2025 INSC 991Appeal(s) allowed

The marriage between Madduri Venkateswara Rao and Madduri Sunanda was dissolved by a California divorce decree in 2007. After returning to India, Sunanda filed a matrimonial suit, a domestic violence case, and an FIR under sections 494 and 498A IPC against her husband and his relatives. The parties …

PARMINDER SINGHversusHONEY GOYAL AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 361Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 21‑year‑old veterinary student and state‑level volleyball player, suffered quadriplegia and 100% disability after being hit by a car, and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 5,16,000, which the High Court enhanced to …

INDEPENDENT THOUGHTversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2017 INSC 1030Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined whether Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which exempts a husband from rape liability when his wife is aged 15‑18, violates the Constitution and conflicts with the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The Court held that the exemption …

KUNAPAREDDY @ NOOKALA SHANKA BALAJIversusKUNAPAREDDY SWARNA KUMAR! & ANR.

2016 INSC 323Dismissed

The case concerned a petition filed by Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji (the wife) under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking protection, maintenance and other reliefs. After the petition was transferred to another magistrate, the wife sought to amend the prayer clause to increase maintenance, …

MANISH GOELversusROHINI GOEL

2010 INSC 82Dismissed

Manish Goel and Rohini Goel married in July 2008 and separated shortly thereafter. The husband filed an annulment suit under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act in Gurgaon, while the wife filed a domestic‑violence petition in Delhi. They later filed a mutual‑consent divorce petition under Section …