Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The landlord filed an eviction petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949, alleging that the tenant had sub-let part of a shop to a tailor. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition, the Appellate Authority reversed that decision, and the High Court reinstated the …
The landlord filed an eviction suit against the tenant, which was upheld by the Rent Controller and affirmed by the appellate authority. The landlord then sought revision under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949, but a single High Court judge dismissed the revision. The …
The landlords (Gurbachan Singh & Anr.) sought eviction of Shivalak Rubber Industries & Ors. under Section 13(2)(iii) of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949, alleging that the tenants had made extensive unauthorised alterations—removing roofs, walls, doors, converting shops into sheds, stores …
Sant Lal, a lessee of a plot of land under a ten‑year lease, granted Avtar Singh a one‑year licence to use a shed for a workshop. After the licence expired, Sant Lal terminated it and sued for a mandatory injunction to vacate the shed. Avtar Singh contended that he had purchased the entire property …
