Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S MANGAT SINGH TRILOCHAN SINGH THR. MANGAT SINGH (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS.versusSATPAL

2003 INSC 52226 September 2003Appeal(s) allowed

In eviction suits filed by landlords against tenants, the landlords sought to strike off the tenants' defence under Order XV Rule 5 of the CPC for failing to deposit arrears of rent before the first hearing. The trial court refused to strike off the defence, allowed the tenants to deposit the arrears later, and accepte

RESHAM SINGHversusRAGHBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER

1999 INSC 35023 August 1999Dismissed

Resham Singh, the landlord, let a shop to Raghbir Singh who later became involved in criminal proceedings and absconded. Raghbir allowed his brother Kuldeep Singh to look after the premises, leading the landlord to file an eviction petition under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act alleging sub‑letting and rent

DR. SHIVDEV SINGH GREWAL THROUGH DR. AMRIK SINGH SANDHUversusHARGURBACHAN SINGH GREWAL

1996 INSC 11537 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, residing in Malaysia, was served summons for a suit seeking declaration of title and possession of property. The suit was decreed ex‑parte on 22 July 1986. Upon learning of the decree on 13 November 1986, the appellant filed an application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 24 Dece

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search