Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
Gulraj Singh Grewal rented a building in Ludhiana from Dr. Harbans Singh and his son. The landlords sought eviction on three grounds under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1948: personal need, change of user, and impairment of value. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition; the …
The petitioners challenged a Central Government notification dated 15 December 1986 that, under Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, extended the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1985 to the Union Territory of Chandigarh. The core issues were whether Section 87 …
The landlord, a retired government servant, filed an eviction petition under Section 13‑A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1985, claiming the premises for his own residence. The tenant argued that the landlord was not a "specified landlord" within the meaning of Section …
