BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.versusMIS. BHOLA RAM STEEL PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2016 INSC 10128 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB) sought to recover minimum guarantee charges from Mis. Bhola Ram Steel Pvt. Ltd., an industrial unit that had been granted exemption under the 1995 Industrial Policy for a connected load of up to 500 KVA. The Board argued that the consumer’s Maximum Demand Indicator (MDI) meter s…
CALCUTTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD.versusSH. N.M. BANKA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 136121 November 1996Disposed off
The Calcutta High Court entertained a writ petition filed by a partnership firm and one of its partners seeking a mandamus directing the electricity supplier, CESC Ltd., not to disconnect supply and to refer disputed bills to an arbitrator. The petitioners had not availed the statutory remedy under Sections 26(4) and 2…
CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION CO. AND ORSversusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ANR.
2007 INSC 83817 August 2007Dismissed
The Central Power Distribution Co. challenged a suo moto order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) that imposed Availability Based Tariff (ABT) and Unscheduled Interchange (UI) charges on the Simhadri thermal station of NTPC, alleging lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice. The Suprem…
M/S RAYMOND LTD. AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusMADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
2000 INSC 53116 November 2000Disposed off
The appellants, industrial consumers, had entered into contracts with the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board requiring them to pay a minimum guaranteed charge equivalent to 40% of the contract demand, irrespective of actual consumption. They challenged the Board's demand for these charges, arguing that the Board had not …
JIYAJEERAO COTTON MILLS LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusMADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS
1988 INSC 27312 September 1988Dismissed
Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. entered into a supply agreement with the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, but due to electricity scarcity the State issued two orders in 1975: a Regulation Order limiting consumption and imposing penal rates for excess use, and a Generation Order requiring consumers with captive power to g…
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.versusKERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPGRATION & ORS.
2017 INSC 10867 November 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by Indian Oil Corporation and several state road transport corporations challenging the Government of India's decision to cease diesel subsidies for bulk consumers. The petitioners argued that the withdrawal of subsidy was arbitrary, violated Article 14, and would impair …