Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003

4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4

SMT NEHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Neha, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the cognizance order and quash the charge sheet in an electricity theft case filed under Section 135 of the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003. The applicant argued that the offence is compoundable and …

RAJENDRA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Rajendra Prasad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and summoning orders and to quash the charge sheet in a criminal case under Section 138(b) of the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003. The applicant argued that the offence is …

MUVIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Muvin Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2023 and to quash the charge sheet filed on 18‑04‑2023 in a case of alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003. The …

CHATURBHUJI MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Chaturbhuji Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 593 of 2025, which arose from a charge under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003 relating to alleged …