Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Employee's Compensation Act, 1923

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SMT. DARIYAO KANWAR & ORS.versusM/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2023 INSC 75623 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Sumer Singh, was employed as a driver by the owner of a truck and was on duty driving from Delhi to Baroda when he felt unwell, parked the vehicle and died. The claimants, his dependents, filed an application under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 and were awarded compensation by the Workmen's Compen

INDRA BAIversusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANOTHER

2023 INSC 62417 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Indra Bai, a loading and unloading labourer, suffered a severe injury to her left arm while loading poles, resulting in loss of grip. The Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, relying on a medical board certificate, held that she was permanently unfit for labour and awarded compensation on the basis of total disablement

K SIVARAMAN & ORS.versusP SATHISHKUMAR & ANR.

2020 INSC 18013 February 2020Dismissed

The appellants, parents and siblings of a deceased employee, claimed compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 for a fatal accident that occurred on 31 January 2008. The High Court enhanced the compensation by applying the post‑amendment monthly wage ceiling of Rs 8,000, invoking the Workmen Compensation

SHOBHA & ORS.versusTHE CHAIRMAN, VITHALRAO SHINDE SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. & ORS.

2022 INSC 29811 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was a sugarcane‑cutting labourer who died from a snake bite while employed by a contractor supplying a sugar factory. His heirs claimed compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 and the Commissioner awarded Rs 306,180 with simple interest at 12% per annum from the date of the accident (29‑No

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search