Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petitioners, Sayali Deepak Upasani Employees Provident Fund Organisation, challenged an order dated 2 November 2016 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (EPFAT) which imposed damages under Section 14B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. The …
St. Mary's School, a Christian minority educational institution, challenged the applicability of the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) Act, arguing it employed fewer than 20 staff and thus fell outside Section 1(3). The school contended that the EPF Tribunal’s order imposing damages under Section 14B …
Cipla Ltd employed cleaning staff through a contractor and routinely terminated them after eleven months to avoid granting permanent status. The Maharashtra General Kamgar Union filed a complaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices …
Som Prakash Rekhi, a clerk of Burmah Shell Oil Storage Ltd., retired with a pension of Rs.165.99 per month under a 1950 trust deed and was also covered by the Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952 and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The employer deducted amounts for PF contributions and gratuity, …
