Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950

9 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

ROYAL WESTERN INDIA TURF CLUB LTD.versusE.S.I. CORPORATION & ORS.

2016 INSC 22129 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether casual workers employed by Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. on race days fell within the definition of "employee" under Section 2(9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and consequently whether the club was liable to pay ESI contributions from the 1978-79 period. Relying on

E.S.I.CversusC.C. SANTHAKUMAR

2006 INSC 87121 November 2006Disposed off

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) sought to recover arrears of contributions from employers as arrears of land revenue under Section 45‑B, relying on orders passed under Section 45‑A. The Kerala High Court held that the five‑year limitation in the proviso to Section 77(1A)(b) applied to such claims, whi

M/S. BHARAGATH ENGINEERINGversusR. RANGANAYAKI AND ANR.

2002 INSC 57220 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased employee of Mis. Bharagath Engineering died in an accident alleged to have occurred in the course of his employment. The employer argued that the claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 should be barred because the employee was an "insured person" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, de

AJAY RAJ SHETTYversusDIRECTOR & ANR.

2025 INSC 50017 April 2025Dismissed

The appellant, Ajay Raj Shetty, who was employed as General Manager/Technical Coordinator of M/s Electriex (India) Ltd., was convicted under Section 85(i)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 for failing to remit ESI contributions that had been deducted from employees' wages. The issue before the Supreme Cour

BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.versusESI CORPORATION

2008 INSC 19114 February 2008Case Allowed

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL), a public sector undertaking, received a notice under Section 45A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 for non‑payment of ESI contributions for the period 1981‑1991. BHEL argued that the workers were employed by contractors and therefore sought to implead those contractors as

EMP. STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusH.M.T. LTD. AND ANR.

2008 INSC 4811 January 2008Case Allowed

The employer, H.M.T. Ltd., failed to deposit the Employees' State Insurance contributions within the statutory period, prompting the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to claim interest and damages under Section 858 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The Karnataka High Court limited interest to two

M/S SRINIVASA RICE MILLversusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION

2006 INSC 83410 November 2006Case Partly allowed

MIS Srinivasa Rice Mill was brought under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 on 1 August 2000. The ESIC had inspected the mill before that date and, based on the inspection, issued a show‑cause notice under section 85(g) threatening criminal prosecution for failure to pay contributions. The mill challenged the no

TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIAversusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ANR.

1999 INSC 5185 November 1999Dismissed

The Transport Corporation of India, a public carrier with its registered head office in Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, was covered by a notification issued by the Andhra Pradesh Government under Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The corporation argued that this notification should not extend to i

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search