Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

NATIONAL FERTILIZERS LTD. & ORS.versusSOMVIR SINGH

2006 INSC 32512 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

National Fertilizers Ltd., a government company, imposed a ban on recruitment in its Marketing Division but nevertheless appointed 52 employees without advertising or notifying the employment exchange, in breach of its own Recruitment and Promotion Rules and the Employment Exchange Act. Various High Courts had ordered

RAJ KUMAR AND ORS. ETC.versusSHAKTI RAJ AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 13111 February 1997Directions issued

The case concerned the recruitment of Canal Patwaris (Class III posts) in Haryana's Irrigation Department. The 1955 Patwaris Rules were amended by a 1970 notification requiring selection through the Subordinate Service Selection Board (SSSB). The Government, however, conducted examinations under the 1955 Rules, then ex

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BHALGORA AREA (NOW KUSTORE AREA) OF M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD.versusWORKMEN BEING REPRESENTED BY JANTA MAZDOOR SANGH

2021 INSC 4527 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The management of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL), a Central Government undertaking, recruited SC/ST miners/loaders in 1986 through the Employment Exchange as mandated by the Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959. Thirty‑eight workmen were later alleged to have obtained appointments fraudu

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search