Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Enemy Property Act, 1968

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

LUCKNOW NAGAR NIGAM & OTHERSversusKOHLI BROTHERS COLOUR LAB. PVT. LTD. & OTHERS

2024 INSC 13522 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the statutory vesting of enemy property in the Custodian for Enemy Property under the Enemy Property Act, 1968 amounts to an expropriation that transfers ownership to the Union of India, thereby invoking Article 285's tax exemption. It held that the Custodian acts only as a trustee fo

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusRAJA MOHAMMED AMIR MOHAMMAD KHAN

2010 INSC 4819 January 2010Dismissed

The respondent, Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, was declared the sole legal heir of the estate of the late Raja of Mahmudabad, which had been taken over by the Custodian of Enemy Property under the Enemy Property Act, 1968. The Custodian’s ledger showed a credit of Rs 1,77,38,828.11 as of 27‑03‑2002, representing ren

ISMAILBHAI I. KANSARA (D) THROUGH LRversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2021 INSC 33113 July 2021Dismissed

Ismailbhai I. Kansara, an encroacher, occupied an evacuee land parcel in Gujarat since 1976 and was served an eviction notice under Section 19(2)(b) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. He filed a writ petition challenging the eviction, but the High Court and the Division Bench dismisse

ABID-UL-ISLAMversusINDER SAIN DUA

2022 INSC 4027 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed an eviction petition under s.14(1)(e) read with s.25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The tenant sought leave to defend under s.25B(5); the Rent Controller denied the application, finding the landlord's bona‑fide need satisfied and the tenant's contentions unsubstantiated. The tenant then approa

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search