Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

English Arbitration Act, 1996

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. SHAKTI BHOG FOODS LIMITEDversusKOLA SHIPPING LIMITED

2008 INSC 108123 September 2008Dismissed

Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd (appellant) entered into a charter party with Kola Shipping Ltd (respondent) to load 13,500 MT of sorghum at Kakinada for shipment to Cotonou, but only 1,100 MT was loaded because the export order from Niger could not be obtained. A dispute arose over demurrage and compensation, leading to multipl

M/S. INDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZER CO-OPERATIVE LIMITEDversusM/S BHADRA PRODUCTS

2018 INSC 5323 January 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co‑operative Ltd., issued a tender for defoamers which was won by the respondent, Bhadra Products. After the respondent supplied the goods, a payment dispute arose and the parties went to arbitration. The sole arbitrator first decided the issue of limitation, holding the claim w

TDM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUE DEVELOPMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

2008 INSC 67714 May 2008Dismissed

The petitioners, TDM Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., sought appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, contending that the arbitration agreement was an international commercial arbitration because the company's central management and control were exercised in Malaysia. Th

EITZEN BULK A/SversusASHAPURA MLNECHEM LTD. & ANR.

2016 INSC 42013 May 2016Disposed off

Eitzen Bulk A/S and Ashapura Minechem Ltd entered into a charter party that contained an arbitration clause specifying London as the seat and English law as the governing law. A dispute arose and was arbitrated in London, resulting in an award against Ashapura. Ashapura sought to set aside the award in India under Sect

VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2011 INSC 38311 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose under a Production Sharing Contract (PSC) between the Government of India and a consortium that included Videocon Industries Ltd. The PSC stipulated Kuala Lumpur as the seat of arbitration, but due to the SARS epidemic the arbitral tribunal held hearings in Amsterdam and London, recording a consent to

ASF BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED

2025 INSC 6162 May 2025Dismissed

The respondent, Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited (SPCPL), filed counter-claims in an arbitration initiated by Black Canyon SEZ Pvt. Ltd. (BCSPL) against BCSPL and two non-signatory entities, ASF Buildtech Private Limited (ABPL) and ASF Insignia SEZ Pvt. Ltd. (AISPL), invoking the group of companies doctri

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search