Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioners, a pharmaceutical manufacturer and its director, challenged notices and demand letters issued by the Union of India, the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) and the Collector for alleged over‑charging on their formulation ‘Cartigen Forte’ alleging that the ceiling price …
The petitioners, a pharmaceutical manufacturer and its director, challenged notices and demand letters issued by the Union of India, the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) and the Collector for alleged over‑charging on their formulation ‘Cartigen Forte’ alleging that the ceiling price …
Duncan Industries Ltd. and its associate challenged the Union of India’s Retention Price Scheme, which determines fertilizer subsidies, alleging that the scheme was a statutory entitlement that could not be retrospectively altered to their detriment. The Supreme Court held that the scheme is merely …
