Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Estate Duty Act, 1953

25 judgments · newest first · showing 1–25

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2009 INSC 286Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the statutory first‑charge provisions in the Bombay Sales Tax Act (s.38C) and the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (s.26B) conflicted with the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (ORT Act) and the Securitisation and Reconstruction of …

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, HYDERABADversusTRUSTEES OF HEH

2003 INSC 232Dismissed

The beneficiaries of the H.E.H. Nizam Jewellery Trust valued their interest in the trust's jewellery based on a valuer's report. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax challenged this valuation, arguing that the estate duty payable on the deemed death of the life tenant had been incorrectly deducted, among …

P. VENKATARAMA REDDYversusCONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY

1998 INSC 263Dismissed

The appellant, P. Venkatarama Reddy, had assigned three life‑insurance policies to his grandchildren during his lifetime but retained possession, continued to pay premiums and loans on them. The revenue treated the policies as part of the deceased’s general estate for estate‑duty purposes, while the …

R.M. ARUNACHALAM ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1997 INSC 554Dismissed

R.M. Arunachalam inherited immovable properties from his adoptive mother, who had received them by will from her husband Ramanathan Chettiar. The assessee sold these properties during assessment years 1966-67 to 1972-73 and claimed that the estate duty paid under the Estate Duty Act, 1953, should be …

SMT. SATHYAPREMA MANJUNATHA GOWDAversusTHE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, KARNATAKA

1997 INSC 366Dismissed

Manjunatha Gowda, a coparcener in a Hindu joint family, received a 4/5 share of family property after a partition in 1965. He died in 1971, and his widow Smt. Sathyaprema Manjunatha Gowda and their unmarried daughter claimed a share of the estate under Section 8(1)(d) of the Hindu Law Women’s Rights …

ASSIT. COLLECTOR OF ESTATE DUTY MADRASversusSMT. V. DEVAKI AMMAL, MADRAS

1994 INSC 523Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two conflicting Madras High Court decisions on the constitutionality of Section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, which mandates aggregation of coparcenary interests of Mitakshara joint Hindu families for estate duty purposes. The issue was whether this provision …

ASHOK SINGHversusASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, CALCUTTA AND OTHERS

1992 INSC 156Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ashok Singh, sought a succession certificate for his father Ganga Singh's intestate estate after attaining majority. The estate duty guardian had failed to file the required account within five years of death, invoking Section 73A of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, which bars any levy …

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, MADRASversusN. SHANKARAN ETC.

1991 INSC 284Dismissed

Natesan Chetty, the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family, owned five houses in his individual capacity and, in 1970, declared that three of them would become joint family property, a process termed "blending". After a partition in 1971, two of the houses were allotted to him while the remaining three …

SMT. P. LEELAVATHAMMAversusCONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD

1991 INSC 44Dismissed

The appellant, SMT. P. Leelavathamma, appealed against the Controller of Estate Duty challenging the computation of the net principal value of the deceased’s estate. She argued that the estate duty payable on the property passing on death constituted a first‑charge encumbrance and therefore should …

DIPTI NARAYAN SRIMANIversusCONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, WEST BENGAL

1988 INSC 160Disposed off

Satya Charan Srimani executed two trust deeds (1953 and 1959) transferring immovable property to himself and his son as trustees while reserving portions of the income for himself, his heirs and deities. After his death, the Estate Duty authorities questioned whether the properties were liable to …

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY GUJARAT-I, AHMEDABADversusMRUDULA NARESHCHANDRA

1986 INSC 121Appeal(s) allowed

Nareshchandra Kantilal, a 28% partner in a firm, died and the accountable person filed an estate duty return that omitted the value of his share in the firm's goodwill, citing a partnership deed clause that the deceased had no right in goodwill. The Assistant Controller and Appellate Controller held …

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, A.P., HYDERABADversusSMT. GODAVARI BAI

1986 INSC 20Dismissed

The deceased partner of a banking firm issued a cheque of Rs.3 lakhs to the firm, which was credited to the accounts of his three minor grand‑nephews. After his death, the widow (assesse) omitted this amount from the estate valuation, arguing that it was a gratuitous transfer of an actionable claim …

DILHARSHANKAR C. BHACHECHAversusTHE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, AHMEDABAD

1986 INSC 4Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a grandson and accountable person, paid estate duty on a bungalow that his grandparents had settled by a joint will. After the wife died, duty was paid on her share; when the husband later died, the revenue claimed duty on his half of the property, arguing that he became the full …

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, BIHAR, PATNAversusMAHARAJA KUMAR KAMAL SINGH

1984 INSC 38Dismissed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bihar appealed against the Patna High Court’s decision that Maharaja Kumar Kamal Singh’s right to receive compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act should be valued at nil because of arrears of agricultural income‑tax. The central issue was whether such tax …

ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY & ORS.versusPRAYAG DASS AGARWAL

1981 INSC 102Disposed off

The respondent, son of a deceased estate, was assessed estate duty of Rs 3,37,543.40. While his appeal against the assessment was pending, he applied under section 52(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, offering a property valued at Rs 2,53,655 as part payment. The Central Board of Direct Taxes …

THE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, LUCKNOWversusALOKE MITRA

1980 INSC 200Appeal(s) allowed

M. Mitra transferred his publishing and printing businesses to two newly formed companies in 1953. He instructed that the shares be allotted to his wife, three sons, brother‑in‑law and an ex‑employee, but the consideration for the shares was paid entirely by Mitra. After Mitra's death in 1957, the …

KHORSHED SHAPOOR CHENAI ETC.versusASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY

1979 INSC 256Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two appeals challenging notices issued by the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty under sections 59(a) and 61 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, which sought to reopen and rectify estate duty assessments of lands acquired by the government. The Court held that the right to …

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, WEST BENGALversusUSHA KUMAR & ORS.

1979 INSC 247Case Partly allowed

Woomesh Chandra Banerjee executed a deed of trust in 1939 transferring all his properties to a trust that allocated one‑half of the income for religious purposes and the other half for family expenses. After his death his son, the deceased, became trustee. Upon the son’s death, the question arose …

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTYversusKAMLAVATI AND SHRI JAI GOPAL MEHRA

1979 INSC 171Dismissed

Maharaj Mal, a half‑partner in a firm, gifted Rs 1,00,000 to his son and Rs 50,000 to his wife in 1957 and simultaneously admitted his son as a partner, transferring half of his share. After the donor's death in 1962 the remaining partnership shares were re‑allocated. The Revenue argued that the …