Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Excise Act, 2018

28 judgments · newest first · showing 1–28

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 7.56 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested, and the …

Naval Kishor SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naval Kishor Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 28.935 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he had no …

Sourabh Kumar TiwaryversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sourabh Kumar Tiwary, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018, with 397.15 litres of liquor recovered. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved because the seized liquor was found …

Suresh Bhuiyan @ Suresh Bhueeya @ Suresh RikiyasanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Bhuiyan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Munmun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Munmun Kumar and Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. They argued that they were …

Adarsh Kumar @ Adarsh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Adarsh Kumar and Vikash Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they have clean …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40.8 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued he was not in possession of the seized vehicles, the allegation rested on a confessional statement …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rohit Kumar and Anjan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 30.240 litres of liquor from a house that does not belong to them. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, no liquor …

Anil Kumar Yadav @ MataluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 360ml of liquor in a Honda City. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in actual …

Dilip Ray @ Deelip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 889.920 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized goods, was not the owner of the …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.36 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …

Madan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Madan Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 785.88 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of …

Subhash Kumar @ Loli @ Subash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018, alleging the recovery of 3,335.4 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …

Sudhir Kumar Yadav @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 1,803 litres of liquor and a vehicle. He argued that he was not in actual …

Mantu Kumar Rai @ Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mantu Kumar Rai applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 800 litres of spirit from a pick‑up vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not in actual possession of the vehicle, that the seizure was based …

Anil MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from the courtyard of Madhusudan Ram. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession …

Teni Rai @ Teni Ray @ Teni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Teni Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …

Rakesh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rakesh and Deepak Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for possession of 15 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was found in a joint family …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Raja Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 37.98 litres of liquor from a bush and 24.48 litres from a house belonging to his mother, Indira Devi. The petitioner argued …

Rajan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajan Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 567 litres of liquor from a vehicle not in his conscious possession. He argued that …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,070 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not in actual possession of the …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Five petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging that they were not arrested, no liquor was found in their possession, and the only evidence against them was a confessional statement of …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018, involving the recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his residence. He asserted that he has a …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Mahato @ Vikash MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3,335.4 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Santlal Manjhi @ Ritlal ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santlal Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging possession of 15 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested …

Upendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Nande Chaudhary @ Nandu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nande Chaudhary and Kishun Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from their jointly owned house. The …

Rakesh DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Das, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 557.730 litres of liquor from his house and a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean …