Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Explosives Act, 1884

29 judgments · newest first · showing 1–29

NARESH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petition was filed by Naresh Singh, who was the Chowki In‑charge, challenging a tribunal order that had upheld a charge of negligence for failing to prevent a second explosion of seized explosives. On 7 November 2023 a large quantity of illegal firecrackers and related materials were seized from …

Sikandar Sao @ Sikandar Kumar Sao @ Sikendar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sikandar Sao, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving illegal mica mining by blasting, which resulted in the death of Basudeo Bhuiyan. The FIR, registered on 04-12-2024, alleged offences under Sections 303(2), 105, 111 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3, 4, 5 of …

SHUBHANGI SHARAD SUTAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, owners of a sparkling candle factory, were charged with culpable homicide not amounting to murder, offences under the Explosives Act and the Child Labour Act after a blast on 18 December 2023 killed 14 workers. They had been in custody for over two years with no progress in the …

ARJUN GOPAL AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 981Directions issued

The petitioners, three infants represented by their fathers, sought a ban on firecrackers and related explosives in Delhi/NCR, alleging severe health hazards from air pollution, especially during Diwali. The Court examined the constitutional balance between the right to health (Art.21) and the …

ARJUN GOPAL AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 1021

The Supreme Court considered several interim applications challenging the suspension of licences for the sale of fireworks in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) that had been ordered to curb air pollution during Diwali. Petitioners sought a restoration of the complete suspension, while …

ARJUN GOPAL AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 897Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard an application for modification of its November 2016 interim order that had suspended all licences for the sale of fireworks in the National Capital Region (NCR) after severe air‑pollution following Diwali 2016. Petitioners – fireworks manufacturers and suppliers – argued …

ARJUN GOPALAND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 981Directions issued

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking emergency relief from the severe air‑pollution in the National Capital Region caused by the widespread use of fireworks during Diwali and the marriage season. They alleged that the pollution breached fundamental rights, especially the …

MOHD. JALEES ANSARI AND OTHERSversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2016 INSC 402Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of sixteen accused convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for a series of bomb blasts on Indian trains in December 1993. The Court held that Section 20A(1) of TADA makes prior approval of the District Superintendent of …

C.B.I.versusKARIMULLAH OSAN KHAN

2014 INSC 165Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sought to add charges of murder and other offences against Karimullah Osan Khan, an accused in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts, under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusBHAGWAN DAS AGRAWAL & OTHERS

2013 INSC 841Disposed off

The State of Rajasthan appealed against a High Court order that had discontinued criminal proceedings in Dholpur under Section 186 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), on the ground that the same offence was already being tried in courts at Sagar and Chanderi, Madhya Pradesh. The three FIRs …

ABU SALEM ABDUL QAYYUM ANSARIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.

2013 INSC 512Disposed off

Abu Salem, an accused in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts, was extradited from Portugal to India in 2005 on the assurance that he would not face the death penalty or imprisonment beyond 25 years. After his return, the Designated Court framed additional charges beyond those covered by the extradition, …

IBRAHIM MUSA CHAUHAN @ BABA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 180Dismissed

The Supreme Court reviewed a series of criminal appeals arising from the 1993 Bombay serial blasts, all tried under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The appeals concerned convictions for offences such as unauthorised possession of arms and explosives (s.3(3), …

YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CBI, BOMBAY

2013 INSC 179Disposed off

On March 12, 1993, a series of 12 bomb explosions occurred in Bombay, killing 257 people and injuring 713, with property damage worth Rs. 27 crores. The conspiracy was hatched by Tiger Memon and Dawood Ibrahim, with Yakub Abdul Razak Memon (A-1) playing a key role. The Designated Court convicted 100 …

AHMED SHAH KHAN DURRANI @ A.S. MUBARAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 178Disposed off

The Supreme Court of India delivered a consolidated judgment on multiple appeals arising from the 1993 Bombay serial blasts case under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The appeals challenged convictions and acquittals of various accused persons involved in the …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusFAZAL REHMAN ABDUL

2013 INSC 181Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined 19 appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against acquittals in the 1993 Bombay serial bomb blast case, focusing on conspiracy charges under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and the Indian Penal Code. It reiterated the limited …

SANJAY DUTT (A-117)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CBI (STF), BOMBAY

2013 INSC 182Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals arising from the Designated Court's judgments in the 1993 Bombay bomb blast case under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The Court held that confessional statements recorded under Section 15 of TADA are substantive …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusKAMAL AHMED MOHAMMED VAKIL ANSARI & ORS.

2013 INSC 162Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned two separate prosecutions arising from the July 2006 Mumbai suburban train bomb blasts. In Special Case No. 21 of 2006, the accused‑respondents sought to summon four Deputy Commissioners of Police (who had recorded confessional statements of three other accused in a later Special …

YANAB SHEIKH@ GAGUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2012 INSC 596Dismissed

The appellant Yanab Sheikh was convicted for murdering Samim Ali by throwing a bomb, under IPC s.302 and the Indian Explosives Act s.9(b)(ii). The prosecution’s case rested on eyewitness statements and forensic evidence. The appellant challenged the conviction on five grounds, chiefly that the …

MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHIDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2012 INSC 357Dismissed

The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab, was one of ten Pakistani terrorists who launched a coordinated attack on Mumbai on November 26, 2008, killing 166 people and injuring 238. He was convicted by the trial court on multiple charges including waging war against the Government of India, …

STATE OF ORISSAversusPRAMOD KR. KODAMSINGH & ORS.

2009 INSC 521Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa prosecuted thirteen accused under IPC sections 302, 149, 148, 326 and Explosives Act section 9. The trial court convicted them, relying on a dying declaration of the deceased and the testimony of injured eye‑witnesses, as well as forensic evidence of bomb residues. The Orissa …

MARANADU AND ANR.versusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU

2008 INSC 1034Dismissed

The case involved six accused who, armed with weapons and bombs, formed an unlawful assembly and murdered Sundaram. The trial court convicted them under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 IPC and Section 9(b)(1)(b) of the Indian Explosives Act, relying heavily on the testimony of two eyewitnesses who …

HARPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2007 INSC 1218Appeal(s) allowed

Harpal Singh was apprehended with a kilogram of explosive powder. The police initially filed a charge-sheet under the Explosives Act, 1884, and later filed a supplementary charge-sheet adding offences under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and the Explosive …

LOPCHAND NARUJI JAT AND ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2004 INSC 514Dismissed

The appellants were intercepted in Surat in 1988 with 180 detonators and were charged under Section 9-B(i)(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 5 of TADA, 1985. The trial court convicted them only under the Explosives Act, sentencing each to one year imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000; the …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.versusSOM NATH THAPA ETC.

1996 INSC 507Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts case, where 145 persons were charged under the IPC and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The Court clarified the law on criminal conspiracy, holding that knowledge of an illegal use can be inferred when the …