Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
Vishnu Sarjerao Dabhade, a fertilizer retailer, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a raid revealed alleged non‑maintenance of records and an expired licence. The prosecution alleged offences under Section 318(4) r/w Sec. 3(5) of the …
M/s Bharat Khad Beej Bhandar, a fertilizer retailer, challenged the cancellation of its license (No. 73/2011-12) by the District Agriculture Officer, Araria, which was based solely on its failure to file a response to a show‑cause notice. The petitioner argued that it could not respond due to the …
The petitioner, Md. Quaisar Khalid, sought quashing of a cancellation order (Memo No. 1834 dated 09.06.2025) of his fertilizer retail licence issued under the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985. The authority cancelled the licence on the ground that the petitioner had not operated his PDS shop for over …
Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., a fertilizer manufacturer, received a government subsidy under the Retention Price Scheme, which compensated the difference between the retention price and the maximum price fixed by the Fertilizer (Control) Order. The Tamil Nadu tax authority treated the subsidy as …
The appellants, manufacturers of micronutrients, challenged the classification of their products for excise duty. An earlier Board circular (June 1990) classified micronutrients as "plant growth regulators" under heading 38.08, while a later circular (November 1994) re‑classified them as "other …
The respondents, small‑scale manufacturers of single super‑phosphate (SSP) fertilizer, were entitled to a government subsidy provided they met the standards prescribed in the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Government of Madhya Pradesh commissioned …
