Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Finance Act, 1997

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD.versusM/S. DEWAN CHAND RAM SARAN

2012 INSC 18425 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a public sector steel manufacturer, appointed the respondent as a handling contractor under a 1998 contract that contained clause 9.3 requiring the contractor to bear all taxes arising from the performance of his obligations. After the Finance Act, 1997 extended service tax to handling contractors, the a

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. TATA TEA CO. LTD. & ANR.

2017 INSC 96020 September 2017Disposed off

The Union of India challenged the constitutional validity of Section 115‑0 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which imposes an additional 10% tax on dividends declared by domestic companies. Tea companies argued that because up to 60% of their income is agricultural, the dividend is agricultural income and therefore only the

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISEversusMIS. WOOD POLYMERS LTD. ETC.

1997 INSC 82117 December 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the classification of paper‑based decorative laminated sheets, cotton‑fabric‑based laminates and paper‑based electrical insulators manufactured by M/s Wood Polymers Ltd. The Revenue argued that the products fell under Chapter 48 (sub‑headings 4818.90/4823.90) and were eligible for concessiona

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

2003 INSC 554 February 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the High Court’s order that the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) was not liable to Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax on rentals collected from telephone subscribers. The Supreme Court examined whether the DoT qualifies as a "dealer" under Section 2(c) of the Uttar Pradesh Trade T

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search