Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Finance Act, 2005

27 judgments · newest first · showing 1–27

DHAVAL MAVJIBHAI KOSHIYAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), BHAVNAGAR

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

DHAVAL MAVJIBHAI KOSHIYAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

RAHUL SURESHBHAI OZEversusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(1)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

NEETABEN NAUTAMKUMAR VAKILversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3)(1)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

NAYANABEN ASHISHBHAI SOPARKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

SITABEN SENDHABHAI PATELversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

SNEHA HETALBHAI SHAHversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3)(1)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

MANUBHAI JOITARAM PATELversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3)(1)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

JAYESH SENDHABHAI PATELversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

MUKESHBHAI JOITARAM PATELversusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3)(1)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

JENISH BHUPATRAI BHUTversusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1)(1)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

ISHWARLAL MAHIDAS BHUTversusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1)(1)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

BHAGWANJIBHAI VIRJIBHAI BORADversusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(1)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

LALJIBHAI JERAMBHAI BORADversusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(1)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

PARAS CHANDRESHBHAI KOTICHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (2)(2)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

PARAS CHANDRESHBHAI KOTICHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (2)(2)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

PARAS CHANDRESHBHAI KOTICHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (2)(2)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

PARAS CHANDRESHBHAI KOTICHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (2)(2)

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitions arose from notices issued under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act after searches were conducted under Section 132/132A. The petitioners argued that when material concerning a third‑person is obtained in a search, the assessing officer must first record satisfaction under Section 153C …

STATE OF KERALA & ANOTHERversusASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. & OTHERS

2025 INSC 757Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered whether assessees engaged in broadcasting television signals to subscribers are liable to pay both entertainment tax under State enactments (Entry 62, List II of the Constitution) and service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 (Entry 97, List I). The Court held that the …

INCOME TAX OFFICERversusVIKRAM SUJITKUMAR BHATIA

2023 INSC 327Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether the amendment to Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 introduced by the Finance Act, 2015 applies to searches under Section 132 that were initiated before the amendment’s effective date of 1 June 2015. A search was conducted on 4 September 2013, and material relating …

M/S. MAHIM PATRAM PRIVATE LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2007 INSC 205Dismissed

Mahim Patram Private Ltd., a contractor printing examination papers for entities outside Uttar Pradesh, was assessed sales tax on its works contracts for AY 2002‑03 and 2003‑04. The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 had been amended to bring works contracts within the definition of "sale" but no Central …