Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Finance Act, 2007

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BAJAJ AUTO LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 40727 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Bajaj Auto Ltd., a manufacturing unit in Uttarakhand, was granted a ten‑year exemption from central excise duty under Notification No. 50/2003‑C. The company, however, did not pay National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD), Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, which were demanded through a show‑cause not

COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALAversusM/S LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.

2015 INSC 58920 August 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether service tax could be levied on indivisible works contracts entered into after the Finance Act, 1994 but before the 2007 amendment that expressly made such contracts taxable. It held that the 1994 Act neither charged nor provided machinery to assess service tax on composite works contr

GVK INDUSTRIES LTD. &ANR.versusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR.

2015 INSC 13118 February 2015Dismissed

GVK Industries Ltd. and its director entered into an agreement with a Swiss non‑resident company (NRC) to act as a financial advisor for a power project, receiving a "success fee" of 0.75% of the debt on loan closure. The Income Tax Officer refused to issue a No‑Objection Certificate for remittance of the fee, directin

IA. K. SIKRI AND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.]versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI

2017 INSC 109210 November 2017Appeal(s) allowed

SRD Nutrients Private Ltd, a manufacturer in Assam, claimed refund of Education Cess and Higher Education Cess paid along with excise duty on goods that were exempted from excise duty under Notification 20/2007‑CE dated 25‑Apr‑2007. The lower authorities and CESTAT held that the notification only exempted excise duty,

M/S. UNICORN INDUSTRIESversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2019 INSC 13366 December 2019Dismissed

Unicorn Industries, a manufacturer in Sikkim, claimed that a 2003 exemption notification under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which exempted basic excise duty and certain additional duties, also covered the National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD), education cess and secondary/higher education cess imposed

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. MARGADARSHI CHIT FUNDS (P) LTD. ETC.

2017 INSC 5884 July 2017Dismissed

The Union of India challenged the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment that exempted chit fund companies from service tax on the ground that their activities fell within the definition of "banking and other financial services" under s.65(12)(a)(v) of the Finance Act after the 2007 amendment. The issue was whether the ope

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search