Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Finance Act, 2007

9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAIversusM/S DIEBOLD SYSTEMS (P) LTD

2026 INSC 808Dismissed

M/s Diebold Systems supplied ATMs to banks under turnkey contracts that included supply, installation and commissioning. The Revenue sought service tax on 33% of the contract value, treating that portion as consideration for "commissioning or installation" under s.65(105)(zzd) of the Finance Act, …

M/S. UNICORN INDUSTRIESversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2019 INSC 1336Dismissed

Unicorn Industries, a manufacturer in Sikkim, claimed that a 2003 exemption notification under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which exempted basic excise duty and certain additional duties, also covered the National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD), education cess and secondary/higher …

BAJAJ AUTO LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 407Appeal(s) allowed

Bajaj Auto Ltd., a manufacturing unit in Uttarakhand, was granted a ten‑year exemption from central excise duty under Notification No. 50/2003‑C. The company, however, did not pay National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD), Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, which were demanded …

IA. K. SIKRI AND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.]versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI

2017 INSC 1092Appeal(s) allowed

SRD Nutrients Private Ltd, a manufacturer in Assam, claimed refund of Education Cess and Higher Education Cess paid along with excise duty on goods that were exempted from excise duty under Notification 20/2007‑CE dated 25‑Apr‑2007. The lower authorities and CESTAT held that the notification only …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. MARGADARSHI CHIT FUNDS (P) LTD. ETC.

2017 INSC 588Dismissed

The Union of India challenged the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment that exempted chit fund companies from service tax on the ground that their activities fell within the definition of "banking and other financial services" under s.65(12)(a)(v) of the Finance Act after the 2007 amendment. The issue …

COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALAversusM/S LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.

2015 INSC 589Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether service tax could be levied on indivisible works contracts entered into after the Finance Act, 1994 but before the 2007 amendment that expressly made such contracts taxable. It held that the 1994 Act neither charged nor provided machinery to assess service tax on …

GVK INDUSTRIES LTD. &ANR.versusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR.

2015 INSC 131Dismissed

GVK Industries Ltd. and its director entered into an agreement with a Swiss non‑resident company (NRC) to act as a financial advisor for a power project, receiving a "success fee" of 0.75% of the debt on loan closure. The Income Tax Officer refused to issue a No‑Objection Certificate for remittance …

SAHARA INDIA (FIRM), LUCKNOWversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I & ANR.

2008 INSC 484Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a pre‑decisional hearing must be afforded before an Assessing Officer orders a special audit under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that, although the provision is silent, the order has civil consequences and therefore the principles of …