Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Foreign Exchange Regulation Act

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSALEENA

2016 INSC 11129 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the detention of Abdu Rahiman under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA). The detenu filed a representation against his detention, which was rejected by the competent authority; the rejection was communicated to him by an under‑secretary rat

DUKHISHYAM BENUPANI, ASSTT. DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE (FERA)versusARUN KUMAR BAJORIA

1997 INSC 76828 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided Arun Kumar Bajoria's residence and issued summons under Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). Bajoria filed a writ petition challenging the summons and later obtained anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC from the City Sessions Court, with a conditio

ASSOCIATE BUILDERSversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

2014 INSC 80925 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Associate Builders entered into a construction contract with the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for a housing project. After completing only part of the work, the contractor filed 15 claims for overheads, damages and price escalations, which were largely awarded by an arbitrator. The Single Judge of the Delhi High C

STATE OF KERALAversusMATHAI VERGHESE & ORS.

1986 INSC 24319 November 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala prosecuted six accused for forging and counterfeiting US dollar notes, alleging offences under Sections 120B, 489A, 489B, 489C, 420, 511 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused argued that Sections 489A and 489C apply only to Indian currency notes, relying on the definition of "currency note" i

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusC. KRISHNA REDDY

2003 INSC 73618 December 2003Case Partly allowed

The Union of India appealed against a Madras High Court order directing payment of a reward to informant C. Krishna Reddy for information that led to customs duty evasion proceedings. The respondent claimed a reward of Rs.1,71,43,272, while the department had sanctioned only Rs.10 lakh. The Supreme Court examined wheth

INDIAN AIRLINES LID.versusPRABHA D. KANAN

2006 INSC 81910 November 2006Case Partly allowed

Prabha D. Kanan, an air hostess promoted to Deputy Manager at Indian Airlines Ltd., was arrested in 2002 for allegedly carrying undeclared foreign currency and her services were terminated on 9 August 2002 under Regulation 13 of the Indian Airlines (Flying Crew) Service Regulations, which allows discharge without enqui

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search