Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947

18 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

THE COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATIONversusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR.

1998 INSC 16230 March 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Coca‑Cola Export Corp., a wholly‑owned non‑resident subsidiary of the Coca‑Cola Company, claimed deductions for pro‑rated home‑office expenses and service charges paid in US dollars. The Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed portions of these deductions and later issued notices under Section 148 of the Income‑Tax Act to

DARA SINGHversusSTATE THROUGH DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, NEW

1980 INSC 20429 October 1980Appeal(s) allowed

The Director of Enforcement, under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, issued an ex parte order on May 12, 1967 imposing a Rs.6,000 penalty on Dara Singh for contraventions of sections 4 and 9, with a 45‑day payment deadline. No payment was made and a complaint under section 23F was filed alleging that a copy of

DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ANOTHERversusK. 0. KRISHNASWAMY

1979 INSC 22326 October 1979Dismissed

The Enforcement Directorate imposed a Rs. 3 lakh penalty on two exporters for over‑invoicing export values to obtain import licences under an export promotion scheme. The exporters pleaded guilty and challenged the penalty before the High Court, which held that Section 12(2)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1

ASSISTANT C.L.T., VADODARAversusELECON ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

2010 INSC 12626 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Assistant C.I.T., challenged the assessee Elecon Engineering's claim that roll‑over premium charges paid on foreign‑exchange forward contracts for a plant‑and‑machinery loan were deductible under Sections 36(1)(iii) or 37 of the Income‑Tax Act. The Tribunal and High Court had held the charges were revenu

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusM/S. GANESH DAS BHOJRAJ

2000 INSC 9122 February 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The importer M/s. Ganesh Das Bhojraj claimed exemption from customs duty on green beans under Notification No.129/76-Cus, but the Central Government amended the exemption by Notification No.40/87-Cus, imposing a 25% duty. The importer contended that the 1987 notification, although published in the Gazette of India, was

P.V. MOHAMMAD BARMAY SONSversusDIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT

1992 INSC 21520 August 1992Dismissed

The firm P.V. Mohammad Barmay Sons owned three vessels and, without Reserve Bank of India permission, purchased and fitted foreign engines, contravening Sections 5(1)(a) and (b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. A raid in 1974 led to a notice, show‑cause proceedings and a penalty of Rs 50,000 imposed under

DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENTversusM/S M.C.T.M. CORPORATION PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 10019 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Directorate of Enforcement prosecuted M.C.T.M. Corp. Ltd. and its directors for failing to repatriate foreign exchange held in Malaysia for over fifteen years, alleging contravention of Section 10(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (FERA) and imposing penalties under Section 23(1)(a). The Appellate

TOOLSIDASS JEWRAJversusADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND OTHERS

1991 INSC 7213 March 1991Dismissed

Toolsidass Jewraj, a jute exporter, entered into contracts for shipment in early 1962 but delayed the shipment to June after prices rose. Before the goods were shipped, it filed shipping bills and G.R. forms that undervalued the FOB price, intending to discount the buyers' profit and remit it covertly. The Additional C

M.G. WAGH & ORS.versusJAY ENGINEERING WORKS LTD.

1987 INSC 913 January 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 applies only to sale proceeds of goods exported "for sale" or also to "exports on sale" where the sale is completed before export. The Court held that the phrase "no person entitled to sell or procure the sale of the said good

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUTversusV.P. SAYED MOHAMMED

1983 INSC 112 January 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, V.P. Sayed Mohammed, was seized with 28 gold bars at Trichur railway station and charged under s.135(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with s.85(ii) of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. Evidence included the inspector’s seizure report, a ticket collector’s testimony, a goldsmith’s certification that the bars

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusPRATAP CHAND & ORS.

1981 INSC 6311 March 1981Dismissed

The State of Karnataka prosecuted three respondents – two partners and their firm – for allegedly providing a fictitious address of the supplier of a drug, violating sections 18(a)(ii), 18(c) and 18A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The prosecution relied on an inspector’s report that the address was fictitious, b

EASTERN CHEMICAL AND MINERALSversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1999 INSC 909 March 1999Dismissed

Eastern Chemical and Minerals exported ferro‑silicon under a barter arrangement and, in return, received import licences for pesticides which it later assigned to users for consideration. The company claimed exemption from additional tax under Section 104(1) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, relying on Notification No. S.O.

MINERAL AND METAL TRADING CORPORATIONversusR. C. MISHRA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 1467 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed

Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation (M.M.T.C.) acted as the intermediary in a private barter scheme through which Ferro Alloys Corporation exported manganese and chrome concentrates. The parties executed contracts whereby title to the goods passed to M.M.T.C., which issued letters of credit, shipping documents and

S.K. KAMDAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1995 INSC 5406 September 1995Dismissed

The appellants were charged with violations of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 and the Indian Penal Code section 120‑B. A complaint was filed under the corresponding provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The trial court dismissed the complaint, holding that the 1947 and 1973 Acts were incon

STATE OF MAHARASIITRAversusNATWARLAL DAMODARDAS SONI

1979 INSC 2584 December 1979Appeal(s) allowed

The Anti‑Corruption Bureau raided Natwarlal Damodardas Soni's residence and seized 100 gold biscuits of foreign origin concealed in a jacket; the Customs authorities subsequently took possession. Soni, who was absent at the time, was later convicted under sections 135(a) and (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Defence

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusMOHD. Y AKUB S/0 ABDUL HAMID & ORS.

1980 INSC 404 March 1980Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra charged three men with attempting to smuggle 43 silver ingots out of India, violating the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the Imports and Exports (Control) Act and the Customs Act. The accused, who were the driver of a jeep, the driver of a truck and a cleaner, argued that they were unaware of

MADDI VENKATARAMANversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 7822 December 1997Dismissed

M. Venkatraman, a public limited company engaged in tobacco export, remitted part of its sale proceeds to a Singapore party in violation of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (FERA) and was penalised Rs.35,000. The company claimed a deduction of Rs.2,95,000 as business expenditure/loss in its 1970-71 income‑tax

RAI BAHADUR SETH SHREERAM DURGAPRASADversusDIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT

1987 INSC 1441 May 1987Dismissed

The partnership firm of Rai Bahadur Seth Shreeram Durgaprasad exported manganese ore between 1952 and 1958 but failed to repatriate the full foreign‑exchange proceeds, contravening Section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. The Director of Enforcement initiated adjudication proceedings under Section 23

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search