Created by Fuzzy Cloud

General Clauses Act, 1897

426 judgments · newest first · showing 401–426

RASHPAL MALHOTRAversusMRS. SATYA RAJPUT AND ANOTHER

1987 INSC 247Dismissed

The landlady (respondent No.1) leased a house in Chandigarh to Haryana Milk Food Corporation (respondent No.2) for the residence of its General Manager, R.P. Malhotra, who signed the lease on behalf of the corporation. After Malhotra left the corporation, the landlady stopped accepting rent and …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P.versusSHAH SADIQ AND SONS.

1987 INSC 108Dismissed

Shah Sadiq & Sons, a partnership firm registered under the Income Tax Act, incurred speculation losses of Rs 60,054 in AY 1960‑61 and Rs 6,839 in AY 1961‑62 and claimed to set them off against a profit of Rs 58,102 in AY 1962‑63. The Income‑Tax Officer rejected the claim, holding that, for a …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S MODI RUBBER LIMITED

1986 INSC 173Disposed off

Modi Rubber Ltd, a tyre manufacturer, claimed that two Government notifications (1974 and 1981) exempted it from all forms of excise duty, including special and additional duties levied under various Finance Acts. The Central Government and the Revenue argued that the phrase "duty of excise" in …

UMAJI KESHAO MESHRAM & ORS.versusRADHIKABAI W/O ANANDRAO BANAPURKAR & ANR.

1986 INSC 41Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether an intra‑court appeal under clause 15 of the Bombay High Court's Letters Patent is available against a judgment of a Single Judge hearing a petition under Article 227 (or Article 226) of the Constitution. The Division Bench had dismissed the appeal on the basis of …

D.K. TRIVEDI AND SONS AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1986 INSC 28Dismissed

The petitioners, holders of quarry and mining leases for minor minerals in Gujarat, challenged a series of state notifications and a circular that altered rates of royalty and dead rent and classified building stones. The core issue was whether Section 15(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and …

EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 238Disposed off

The petitioners, Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. and others, challenged two notices: one issued by the Engineer Officer, Land & Development Office, for re-entry upon forfeiture of lease, and another by the Zonal Engineer (Building), Municipal Corporation of Delhi, for demolition of the Express …

H. ANRAJ ETC.versusGOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU ETC.

1985 INSC 221Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether state lotteries organised by Tamil Nadu and West Bengal could be taxed under the states' sales‑tax statutes. The petitioners, dealers in lottery tickets, argued that lottery tickets are not "goods" but merely actionable claims, rendering the amendments to the Tamil …

M/S. HINDUSTAN GUM & CHEMICALS LTD.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1985 INSC 180Dismissed

Hindustan Gum & Chemicals Ltd. challenged the levy of octroi by the Bhiwani Municipal Committee after its factory was brought within municipal limits by a 1965 notification under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, relying on Section 5(4) of the Act, but the …

STATE OF ORISSA & OTHERSversusTHE TITAGHUR PAPER MILLS COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

1985 INSC 43Disposed off

The State of Orissa issued notifications under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, imposing a 10% purchase tax on bamboos and standing trees agreed to be severed. Petitioners challenged the validity of these notifications, arguing that the transactions were not sales of goods, that the tax amounted to …

IBRAHIM BACHU BAFAN & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS .

1985 INSC 23Case Allowed

The petitioners were detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. While their detention orders were pending before the Gujarat High Court, the Court quashed the orders by exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction, but the same day fresh …

ASHOK KUMAR BHATTACHARYYAversusAJOY BISWAS AND ORS.

1984 INSC 213Dismissed

The petitioner challenged the election of the respondent, who was the Accountant‑in‑charge of Agartala Municipality, on the ground that he held an office of profit under the Government of Tripura within the meaning of Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution. The High Court held that the municipal post …

PRABODH VERMA AND OTHERS, ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS, ETC.

1984 INSC 130Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a strike by teachers in Uttar Pradesh in 1977, after which the State appointed 2,257 "reserve pool" teachers on a temporary basis under Ordinance No.25 of 1977. Subsequent Ordinances No.10 and No.22 of 1978 sought to absorb these teachers and give them preferential treatment in …

PASHUPATI NATH SUKUL & OTHERS.versusNEM CHANDRA JAIN & OTHERS.

1983 INSC 187Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two issues arising from a Rajya Sabha election in Uttar Pradesh: whether the Secretary of the State Legislative Assembly could be appointed as Returning Officer under Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and whether an elected Assembly member who had …

M/S PUNJAB TIN SUPPLY CO.,CHANDIGARH ETC. ETC.versusTHE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT & ORS.

1983 INSC 154Dismissed

The petitioners challenged three notifications issued by the Chief Commissioner of Chandigarh under Section 3 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (as extended to Chandigarh), arguing that the section delegated excessive legislative power, violated Article 14, was ultra‑violet of the …

T. BARAIversusHENRY AH HOE AND ANOTHER

1982 INSC 92Dismissed

The appellant, a food inspector, charged the respondents with adulterating food under s.16(1)(a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 as it stood in West Bengal after the 1973 State amendment, which prescribed life imprisonment and made the offence triable only by a Sessions Court. While …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusNARAYAN SHAMRAO PURANIK AND OTHERS

1982 INSC 78Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra sought to establish a permanent bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, but pending central approval, the Chief Justice issued an order under s.51(3) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, appointing Aurangabad as a place where Judges and Division Courts may also sit. …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDEWADAS & ORS.

1982 INSC 10Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh sought to appeal an acquittal under section 378(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and filed an application for leave under section 378(3). By prevailing practice in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the leave application was listed before a Single Judge under Rule …

HARCHARAN SINGHversusSHIV RANI AND ORS.

1981 INSC 43Dismissed

Harcharan Singh, a tenant of a shop in a U.P. cantonment, failed to pay rent for 1965‑66. The landlord sent a combined notice of arrears and eviction by registered post on 9 November 1966, which the tenant refused to accept on 10 November. The landlord sued for eviction under the U.P. Cantonment …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusR. C. JAIN & ORS.

1981 INSC 35Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had paid bonus to its employees for ten years until 1973‑74, after which it stopped the payments on advice of the Ministry of Law. The employees challenged the stoppage by filing a writ petition, which the Delhi High Court allowed. The Union of India and the DDA …

SWADESHI COTTON MILLSversusUNION OF INDIA

1981 INSC 10Appeal(s) allowed

Swadeshi Cotton Mills challenged a Government order under Section 18AA of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, which authorised the National Textile Corporation to take over its management without a prior hearing. The Supreme Court examined whether the principle of audi alteram …

MARU RAM ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

1980 INSC 212

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which imposes a mandatory minimum of fourteen years’ imprisonment on two categories of life‑sentence convicts – those convicted of offences where death is a possible punishment and those whose …

VISHESH KUMARversusSHANTI PRASAD

1980 INSC 46Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered five civil revision petitions filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) that were dismissed by the Allahabad High Court on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The Court examined whether the High Court could exercise revisional jurisdiction under …

M. S. SHIVANANDAversusKARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERS

1979 INSC 185Dismissed

The Karnataka Government promulgated the Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1976 which provided that certain employees of contract carriage operators would be automatically absorbed into the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) at a ratio of 7.9 per vehicle. The Ordinance was …