Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Gift Tax Act, 1958

22 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2009 INSC 28627 February 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the statutory first‑charge provisions in the Bombay Sales Tax Act (s.38C) and the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (s.26B) conflicted with the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (ORT Act) and the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and En…

M/S. SREE NARAYANA CHANDRIKA TRUSTversusCOMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, KERALA

2003 INSC 25925 April 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The Sree Narayana Chandrika Trust, a partner in Chandrika Enterprises, saw its profit share fall from 45% to 30% when the firm was reconstituted and a new partner, M.U. Indira, contributed Rs 25,000 for a 12% share. The Gift Tax Officer treated the 15% reduction as a gift and levied tax under the Gift Tax Act, 1958. Th…

SATYA NANO MUNJALversusCOMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX

2013 INSC 4922 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Satya Nand Munjal transferred 6,000 equity shares to a transferee in February 1982 under a deed that allowed revocation within a specified window. The transferee received 14,000 bonus shares during the period the gift was effective, and Munjal revoked the gift in June 1988, retaining the original shares but not the bon…

SATYA NAND MUNJALversusCOMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA

2013 INSC 5022 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard appeals by three assessee brothers (Satya Nand Munjal, Brij Mohan Lal Munjal and Om Prakash Munjal) challenging High Court judgments that held they were liable to pay interest under section 168 of the Gift Tax Act, 1958 on tax assessed for the 1989‑90 assessment year. The issues were whether int…

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, GUJARAT-III, AHMEDABADversusELLIS BRIDGE GYMKHANA ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 70421 October 1997Case Partly allowed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat sought to assess Ellis Bridge Gymkhana, an unincorporated club, for wealth tax for assessment years 1970‑71 to 1977‑78, arguing that the club fell within the term “individual” in Section 3 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The club contended that an association of persons is not an in…

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, MADRASversusK. S. N. BHATT

1983 INSC 15821 October 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, K.S.N. Bhatt, claimed deductions in his wealth‑tax returns for income‑tax, wealth‑tax and gift‑tax liabilities, arguing that these amounts were debts owed on the valuation dates for the assessment years 1964‑65 to 1967‑68. The Wealth Tax Officer allowed only part of the deductions; the Appellate Assistant…

R.K. GARG ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC.

1981 INSC 18120 October 1981Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Special Bearer Bonds (Immunities and Exemptions) Ordinance, 1981 and the subsequent Act, which granted anonymity and tax exemptions to holders of special bearer bonds intended to canalise black money. The petitioners argued that the President lacked authority unde…

THE COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, TRIVANDRUMversusT.M. LOUIZ

2000 INSC 45420 September 2000Dismissed

The respondent, a retiring partner of two firms, surrendered his partnership rights and received the value of his share in the firms' assets. The Gift Tax Officer treated this relinquishment as a transfer of property and levied gift tax. The assessee appealed, and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribunal, and…

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, BIHAR, PATNAversusMAHARAJA KUMAR KAMAL SINGH

1984 INSC 3820 February 1984Dismissed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bihar appealed against the Patna High Court’s decision that Maharaja Kumar Kamal Singh’s right to receive compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act should be valued at nil because of arrears of agricultural income‑tax. The central issue was whether such tax arrears could be deducted …

SRI JAGATRAM AHUJAversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, HYDERABAD

2000 INSC 48117 October 2000Appeal(s) allowed

Sri Jagatram Ahuja, a retiring partner of a firm, executed a release deed whereby he transferred his rights in the firm's assets to his brother for Rs. 3,00,000, although the market value of his share was higher. The Gift Tax Officer treated the excess as a gift and levied tax, a decision upheld by the Commissioner (Ap…

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAXversusSMT. HASHMATUNNISA BEGUM

1989 INSC 1417 January 1989Disposed off

The case concerned gifts of immovable property made by a deceased individual to his wives in 1962, which were chargeable to gift‑tax. The assessee claimed that, under the proviso to section 4(1)(a) of the Wealth‑Tax Act, 1957, such gifts should be exempt from wealth‑tax assessment for all assessment years commencing af…

M/S. KHODAY ESWARSA AND SONSversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX

2001 INSC 50816 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a partnership firm, granted a five‑year licence to a private limited company, with either party able to terminate the licence by giving six months' written notice. The Gift Tax Officer treated the transfer of the business as a gift made for inadequate consideration and levied gift tax for AY 1970‑71. The…

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPURversusSIREHMAL NAWALAKHA

2001 INSC 37216 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent attempted to gift out‑houses attached to a building to his wife by an unregistered declaration dated 10 October 1966. The Gift Tax Officer rejected the claim, holding that Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, which requires a registered instrument for a gift of immovable property, was not complie…

COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX GUJARATversusCHHOTALAL MOHANLAL

1987 INSC 11316 April 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, a partner in M/s. Chhotalal Vedilal, reduced his share in the firm and admitted his two minor sons to the partnership benefits, thereby relinquishing 19% of the goodwill. The Gift Tax Officer treated this relinquishment as a taxable gift of goodwill. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribunal, and…

KHODAY DISTILLERIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

2008 INSC 129914 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed

Khoday Distilleries Ltd issued a rights issue; twenty of its twenty‑seven shareholders did not subscribe and the unissued shares were allotted to seven existing investment‑company shareholders. The company also issued fully paid bonus shares in a 1:23 ratio. The Assessing Officer treated both the rights‑issue allotment…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-IIversusM/S BPL LIMITED

2022 INSC 107713 October 2022Dismissed

The Deputy Commissioner of Gift Tax appealed against the valuation of shares gifted by M/s BPL Limited to M/s Celestial Finance Ltd. The shares, although listed, were promoter quota shares subject to a lock‑in period, raising the question of whether they were "quoted" for valuation purposes. The Supreme Court held that…

COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, ERNAKULAMversusABDUL KARIM MOHD. (DEAD) BY LRS.

1991 INSC 14610 July 1991Dismissed

The Commissioner of Gift Tax appealed against a Kerala High Court order that allowed an exemption from gift tax on a transfer of movable assets made by a Muslim businessman who was seriously ill and died six weeks after executing a settlement deed. The issue was whether the transfer qualified as a "gift in contemplatio…

K.P. VARGHESEversusTHE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM, AND ANOTHER

1981 INSC 1604 September 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.P. Varghese, sold a house to his daughter‑in‑law and five children for the same price he had paid for it (Rs 16,500) and reported no capital gain for the 1966‑67 assessment year. The Income‑Tax Officer later issued a notice under section 148 and reassessed the assessee, fixing the fair market value at …

S. VIJIversusCOMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX

1997 INSC 7812 December 1997Dismissed

The appellant, S. Viji, received unquoted shares of a company as a gift on 28 March 1973 and the valuation of these shares for gift tax purposes was disputed. Both parties agreed that the break‑up method under Section 6(3) of the Gift Tax Act, 1958 should be applied, but differed on which balance sheet to use: the one …

REVA INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, GUJARAT II

2001 INSC 2442 May 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Reva Investment Pvt Ltd transferred jewellery, valued at Rs 13,91,350, to its twelve wholly‑owned subsidiary companies in exchange for fully paid equity shares having a face value of Rs 5,69,400. The subsidiaries held no assets other than the jewellery, while the shares received represented the entire shareholding of t…

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search