SUNSTAR HOMES THR. IRS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR. THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND 2 ORS

M/S Sunstar Homes challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, alleging that it improperly prescribes a single mode of execution for both types of orders under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. …

SUNSTAR HOMES THR. ITS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR. THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND 3 ORS

Sunstar Homes challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, arguing that it improperly prescribes a single method of execution for both types of orders under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The …

SUNSTAR HOMES THR. ITS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR. THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND 2 ORS

Sunstar Homes, a partnership, filed writ petitions challenging the constitutionality of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, alleging that it improperly prescribes a single mode of execution for both sub‑sections of Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and …

SUNSTAR HOMES THR. ITS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR. THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

M/S Sunstar Homes challenged the validity of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, alleging it improperly mandates a single mode of execution for both sub‑section 1 and sub‑section 2 of Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The RERA …

M/S. SUNSTAR HOMES THR. ITS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS

Disposed of

Sunstar Homes challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, arguing that it improperly prescribes a single method of execution for both types of orders under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The …

M/S. SUNSTAR HOMES THR. ITS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

M/S Sunstar Homes challenged the validity of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, alleging it improperly mandates a single mode of execution for both sub‑section 1 and sub‑section 2 of Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The RERA …

M/S. SUNSTAR HOMES THR. ITS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

Sunstar Homes, a partnership, filed writ petitions challenging the constitutionality of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, alleging that it improperly prescribes a single mode of execution for both sub‑sections of Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and …

M/S. SUNSTAR HOMES THR. ITS PARTNER ANUP VISHRAM PRABHU WALAVALKARversusSTATE OF GOA THR. THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND 2 ORS

Disposed of

M/S Sunstar Homes challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 4 of the Goa Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, alleging that it improperly prescribes a single mode of execution for both types of orders under Section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. …