Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

K.C. BAJAJ AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 78827 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, doctors employed in Central Health Services and Railways, sought inclusion of the Non‑Practicing Allowance (NPA) in the computation of their pension, arguing that an Office Memorandum dated 29‑Oct‑1999 unjustly excluded NPA for those who retired before 1 January 1996. The Union of India relied on the de

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusAGRICAS LLP AND OTHERS ETC.

2020 INSC 50826 August 2020Disposed off

The Union of India amended the import policy for peas and other pulses, shifting them from a free to a restricted category and imposing quantitative import limits through notifications and a trade notice issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act). Importers challenged the validity

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusK. P. S. RAGHUVANSHI & ORS.

2017 INSC 129411 May 2017Disposed off

DIG K.P.S. Raghuvanshi challenged the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) recommendation for his promotion to Inspector General of the Indian Coast Guard, alleging that the DPC was conducted under the newly issued Coast Guard Order (CGO) 02/09, which altered the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) criteria, and that th

SK NAUSAD RAHAMAN & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2022 INSC 28710 March 2022Disposed off

The petitioners, inspectors under the Central Excise and Customs cadre, challenged a circular dated 20 September 2018 that barred Inter‑Commissionerate Transfers (ICTs) after the 2016 Recruitment Rules came into force, alleging violations of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 21 of the Constitution and the Rights of Persons with

INDIAN RAILWAYSversusWEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.

2026 INSC 4648 May 2026Dismissed

Indian Railways sought open access to procure 100 MW of power and claimed it is a deemed distribution licensee (DDL) under the Electricity Act, 2003, thereby exempt from cross‑subsidy surcharge (CSS) and additional surcharge. The dispute centered on whether activities under sections 11(g) and 11(h) of the Railways Act

ANOOP BARANWALversusUNION OF INDIA

2023 INSC 1902 March 2023Case Partly allowed

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity of the practice of appointing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs) solely by the executive. The Supreme Court examined Article 324(2) and Constituent Assembly debates, concluding that Parliament was intended to enact a law gover

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search