Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioner, an Additional District Judge, sought to quash a departmental inquiry and his suspension, alleging that the inquiry violated Ministry of Law and Justice guidelines requiring a complaint with an affidavit. The High Court examined whether the disciplinary authority could initiate an …
The petitioner, a police constable appointed in 2001, was convicted under Sections 7, 12 and 13(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for an ACB offence and was dismissed from service by the disciplinary authority on 19 July 2019 without being served a show‑cause notice. He filed a writ …
The petitioner, a Class‑I officer, was subjected to a departmental inquiry and charge‑sheets in 1990 and 1994, but was exonerated by the inquiry officer in 1998. The disciplinary authority nonetheless rejected his reply to a show‑cause notice dated 31‑12‑1998 and imposed a penalty of stoppage of one …
