Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

JUNAGADH NAGARPALIKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

1993 INSC 12731 March 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined challenges by Morvi and Junagadh Municipalities to the Gujarat Municipalities Rules governing consolidated property tax. Taxpayers had contested Rule 5, which allowed the actual rent received to be used as the annual letting value, alleging it was ultra vires Section 99(1)(i) read with Sectio

SAIJ GRAM PANCHAYATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

1999 INSC 2527 January 1999Dismissed

The State of Gujarat issued notifications under Section 16 of the Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962 declaring the Kaloi Industrial Area a notified area under the Gujarat Municipalities Act and simultaneously excluded it from Saij Gram Panchayat under the Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1961, along with a resolution alloc

PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2021 INSC 11524 February 2021Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard two civil appeals and a writ petition concerning the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and related rules on ward delimitation and reservation. The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of sections 5(3)(iii)(a) and 29A of the Act, Rules 4 and 5 of the 1994 Bombay Municipal

J.N. GANATRAversusMORVI MUNICIPALITY, MORVI

1996 INSC 75519 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed

J.N. Ganatra, an overseer with Morvi Municipality, was dismissed by a resolution dated 1 December 1970 without the procedure prescribed in Rule 35 of the Morvi City Municipal Officers and Servants Conduct, Discipline, Dismissal, Penalty and Appeal Rules, 1960. He filed a civil suit challenging the dismissal; the trial

AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusGTL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS. ETC.

2016 INSC 115316 December 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Gujarat's municipal tax provisions could levy a tax on mobile telephone towers. The petitioners (Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation) argued that mobile towers are not "land or building" under Entry 49 of List II of the Seventh Schedule, rendering the tax ultra‑violet. The Court interpret

BIPIN CHANDRA PARSHOTTAMDAS PATEL (VAKIL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

2003 INSC 22914 April 2003Dismissed

B.P. Patel, elected President of Anand Municipality, was arrested and placed in judicial custody for alleged offences under the IPC, Arms Act and Bombay Police Act. The Director of Municipalities suspended him under Section 40 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963, which provides for suspension if a municipal officer

JAYARAJBHAI JAYANTIBHAI PATELversusANILBHAI JAYANTIBHAI PATEL AND ORS.

2006 INSC 59511 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a municipal election in Anand where two independent councillors were arrested minutes before the election of the President, preventing them from voting. The presiding officer, aware of the arrests, proceeded with the election, resulting in a tie and a draw of lots that declared the appellant

THE DHARANGADRA CHEMICAL WORKSversusDHARANGADHRA MUNICIPALITY & ANOTHER

1985 INSC 1923 September 1985Dismissed

The appellant, Dharangadhra Chemicals, challenged the levy of octroi duty at an enhanced rate imposed by Dharangadhra Municipality under its Octroi Rules and Bye‑laws of 1965. The dispute centered on whether the municipal rules could be brought into force without a statutory exemption from the Saurashtra Terminal Tax a

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search