Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
10 judgments · newest first · showing 1–10
Neptune Realty Pvt Ltd filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging notices and consequent orders issued by two respondent authorities as illegal and beyond their jurisdiction under the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958. The petitioner sought mandamus, …
The petitioner, Hiren Dhamendra Talia, executed a sale deed for non‑agricultural land and paid stamp duty based on the consideration price of Rs 1,93,00,000. The sub‑registrar and later the Deputy Collector assessed a higher market value, levying a deficit stamp duty of Rs 38,25,528 and a penalty. …
Motiben Khengarbhai Vadher purchased a parcel of land in 2009, paid stamp duty based on a market‑value assessment of Rs 15,00,000 and a sale price of Rs 17,80,000. After an audit by the Accountant General, the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and the Deputy Collector re‑opened the valuation, …
The petitioner, Shri Jatin Shailesh Patel, purchased a franking stamp for Rs 10,500 from a bank, but a government notification dated 06‑04‑2023 stipulated that the stamp should have been issued at Rs 10,000. He applied to the Superintendent of Stamps for a refund and also filed an RTI application, …
The petitioners purchased land that had been converted from agricultural to non‑agricultural use, paid the requisite stamp duty and an additional deficit of Rs 2,00,001 as directed under Section 41 of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, and obtained a certificate on 13‑Oct‑2017. On 11‑Dec‑2025, the Chief …
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private Limited filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 challenging a communication dated 13‑12‑2025 issued by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Gujarat, which had rejected its revision application under Section 53 read with Section 44 of the Gujarat …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Corp. Pvt. Ltd., sought relief under Article 226 of the Constitution and the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, challenging an ex‑parte order dated 03‑Nov‑2023 that demanded a deficit stamp duty of Rs 16,47,562 plus penalty. The land in question was lease‑held by Bhadreshbhai Patel, …
The petitioners, Vaibhav Corp. Pvt. Ltd., sought relief under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 03.11.2023 issued by the Deputy Collector, Stamp Duty Valuation Office, which demanded payment of Rs. 17,47,156 as additional stamp duty and penalty. The land in question …
The Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. acquired a defaulted loan from Oriental Bank of Commerce through an assignment agreement that was registered as a single instrument. The deed contained a Schedule 3 draft of a Power of Attorney (PoA) authorising the assignee to sell immovable property, …
Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd obtained loans from thirteen financial institutions which formed a consortium and appointed State Bank of India as a security trustee. The borrower executed a single mortgage deed (Indenture of Mortgage) with the trustee, paying Rs 4.21 lakh stamp duty. The Gujarat revenue …
