Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2016 INSC 27929 March 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Mis. Casio India Co. Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of radio pagers in Haryana, claimed exemption from Central Sales Tax (CST) on inter‑state sales of goods it purchased from another dealer holding a valid exemption certificate under Rule 28A. The State of Haryana rejected the claim, contending that the exemption applied on

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.versusBALDEV SPINNERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2009 INSC 25525 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana sought to withdraw an eligibility certificate granted to Baldev Spinners Pvt. Ltd. under Rule 28A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975, on the ground that the applicant failed to produce a NOC/CLU certificate for agricultural land. The applicant had not disclosed that its unit was situated

STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERSversusM/S. MAHABIR VEGETABLE OILS PVT. LTD.

2011 INSC 14521 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana withdrew the sales‑tax exemption for solvent‑extraction plants by placing the industry in a negative list on 16‑12‑1996, after Mahabir Vegetable Oils Pvt. Ltd. had invested in setting up such a plant based on an earlier promise of exemption. The respondent claimed entitlement to the exemption on th

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.versusBHARTI TELETECH LTD.

2014 INSC 3620 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana granted Bharti Teletech Ltd. a sales‑tax exemption under Rule 28A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 for the period 13‑Dec‑1991 to 12‑Dec‑1998, conditioned on the unit maintaining average production for five years after the exemption. After the exemption expired, the Deputy Excise and Tax

STATE OF HARYANAversusM/S LIBERTY ENTERPRISES

2009 INSC 36017 March 2009Dismissed

M/s Liberty Enterprises, a shoe manufacturer in Haryana, was granted a sales‑tax exemption certificate (Rs 533 lakhs) under Section 138 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and Rule 28A of the 1975 Rules, effective 15 Mar 1995‑14 Mar 2002. The exemption was used until 31 Dec 1996, after which the firm switched to

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusSANT LAL AND ANR.

1993 INSC 2929 September 1993Dismissed

The respondents, who are clearing and forwarding agents (dalals), challenged Section 38 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and Rule 53 of the 1975 Rules, which required them to obtain a licence, furnish transaction particulars and face a penalty of 20% of the value of goods for non‑compliance. The Punjab & Hary

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search