Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

JAVED AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 34230 July 2003Dismissed

The petitioners were disqualified from contesting or holding Panchayat offices under Sections 175(1)(q) and 177(1) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 because they had more than two living children. They challenged the provisions as arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 25 of the Constituti

JINDAL STRIPE LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 51626 September 2003

The petitioners, manufacturers in Haryana, challenged the constitutional validity of the Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000, alleging it violated Article 301 of the Constitution and was not saved by Article 304(b). They argued that the Act imposed an entry tax on goods moving into local areas, effectively a s

SUMAN DEVIversusMANISHA DEVI AND ORS.

2018 INSC 73021 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was declared elected as Ward Councilor on 28 January 2016. The first respondent filed an election petition under Section 176 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act on 10 February 2016, withdrew it on 1 March 2016 and was given liberty to file a fresh petition, which she did on 2 March 2016—beyond the 30‑day pe

UDEY CHANDversusSURAT SINGH AND ANR.

2009 INSC 11829 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Udey Chand, was declared Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat by a margin of four votes. The election petitioner, Surat Singh, filed an election petition under Section 176(4)(b) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, seeking a recount of votes alleging irregularities in counting and misconduct by the Returning

THE STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF HARYANAversusJAI SINGH & ORS.

2022 INSC 4007 April 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Haryana Act No. 9 of 1992 (the Amending Act) which amended the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. The issues centered on whether the amendment amounted to an acquisition of land without compensation, whether it fell within the protection of Arti

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search