ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS
2023 INSC 56419 May 2023Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the recommendations of the Second National Judicial Pay Commission (SNJPC) concerning pay, pension, gratuity, retirement age and related service conditions for the district judiciary. The petitioners, All India Judges Association, sought uniform designations, a pay matrix with a 2.81 multipli…
UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LAW & JUSTICEversusJUSTICE (RETD) RAJ RAHUL GARG (RAJ RANI JAIN) AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 21915 March 2024Disposed off
Justice (Retd) Raj Rahul Garg retired as a District Judge on 31 July 2014 and was appointed a High Court Judge on 25 September 2014, retiring from the High Court on 4 July 2016. She filed a petition under Article 226 seeking that her entire judicial service, including the 54‑day gap, be counted for pensionary benefits.…
THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRAversusS.C. MALTE & ORS.
2012 INSC 59713 December 2012Matter referred to larger bench
Retired judges of the Bombay High Court complained that the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) was unavailable in many areas, limiting their medical treatment and reimbursement. The Bombay High Court, treating the complaint as a suo motu writ, directed the Maharashtra Government to frame rules under Section 230 of…
K. SREEDHAR RAOversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW & JUSTICE, NEW DELHI
2019 INSC 10126 September 2019Dismissed
K. Sreedhar Rao, a former judge of the Karnataka Judicial Service, retired as Acting Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court after serving 14 months in that capacity and sought pensionary benefits equivalent to those of a retired Chief Justice. The Central Government denied the higher pension ceiling, contending that t…
JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 8625 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Eight judges of the Patna High Court, appointed from the District Judiciary, were denied subscription to the General Provident Fund (GPF) on the ground that they had previously been covered by the New Pension Scheme. They filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking equal treatment. The Supreme Court examined whether …