Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 2004

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

H.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusMUKESH THAKUR & ANR.

2010 INSC 33025 May 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised 13 vacancies for Civil Judge (Junior Division) and conducted a written examination. Respondent No.1, Mukesh Thakur, secured the required aggregate marks but failed to obtain the mandatory 45% in the Civil Law‑II paper, and was therefore not called for interview.

VIVEK KAISTH & ANRversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS

2023 INSC 100720 November 2023Disposed off

The Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised eight vacancies for Civil Judge (Junior Division) in 2013, but later added two names, including Vivek Kaist[h] and Akansha Dogra, to the select list via a government notification. The High Court held that these appointments were illegal because the added vacanci

P. D. GOELversusHIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL

2017 INSC 7158 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed

P.D. Goel, a District and Sessions Judge of Himachal Pradesh, was issued a notification by the High Court in 2005 stating that he stood retired as of 31 July 2005, i.e., at the age of 58, under the proviso to Rule 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 2004. He challenged the notification, and a Single Judg

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search