Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

57 judgments · newest first · showing 1–57

ANITA SANJAY RANALKARversusSANJAY PURSHOTTAM RANALKAR AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed a first appeal against a judgment dated 27 September 2023 under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 concerning custody of a minor child. The appeal was filed 171 days after the judgment, exceeding the prescribed time limit. The court examined the reasons …

SMT EKATA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, claimed to have married of their own free will and sought a writ of mandamus to prevent interference by the father of one petitioner, alleging threats to their life and liberty. The State counsel argued that the marriage was void or voidable because the male petitioner …

KULDEEP GUPTAversusSMT. PRIYANKA GUPTA

The petitioner, Kuldeep Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to expedite the disposal of a pending civil miscellaneous petition concerning guardianship under Section 7 and Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, …

SHRI. YOGESH GANGARAM SANAP AND ANRversusSHRI. ANIL MAHADEV RAGHAV

Disposed Off

The petitioners, biological parents of a girl child ‘Y’, sought interim custody under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, alleging that the respondent, a neighbour, had illegally retained the child after a temporary custodial arrangement and had fraudulently enrolled her under a false …

SONAL SANJIV DESHPANDEversusMASTER YASHRAJ SANJIV DESHPANDE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a natural guardian, sought leave to sell a flat in which a minor held a 33.34% share, invoking Section 8(2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. The minor’s share arose after the deceased father’s intestate death and a subsequent gift deed by the mother to the minor. The …

SATENDRA KUMARversusRAVINDRA SINGH

Satendra Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to decide the pending Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.28 of 2025 (Satendra Kumar v. Ravindra Singh) filed under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, …

MASTER RUDRANSH MINOR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The mother of an 18‑month‑old child filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that the father had forcibly taken the child away. The Single Judge dismissed the petition, holding that the child was in the father's custody and directing the mother to seek relief under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and …

Dipu Kumar Singh @ Dipu @ Kariman SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dipu Kumar Singh applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a matrimonial dispute where his wife alleged dowry demands, torture and her ouster from the marital home. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false and that the matter should be resolved through mediation. The court …

SMT PREETI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a 21‑year‑old woman and a 20‑year‑old man, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life, alleging threats from the woman's father. The State argued that the marriage was void or voidable under the Prohibition of Child Marriage …

RajKamalversusThe Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, old Secretariat Patna

DISPOSED

The petitioner, RajKamal, filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking the release of his two minor children, alleging that his in‑laws had taken them into illegal custody after his wife’s death. He claimed the respondents, including police officials and his in‑laws, were unlawfully detaining the children. …

Dhiran Kumar @ Dhirendra Kumar Baitha @ Dhirendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiran Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a matrimonial dispute where the wife alleged dowry demands, torture and eviction. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties agreed to appear before the …

SMT. JANKI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a 20‑year‑old woman and a 19‑year‑old man, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection, alleging harassment by the woman's father. The State argued that the marriage was void or voidable under the …

ELUMALAI @ VENKATESAN & ANRversusM. KAMALA AND ORS. & ETC.

2023 INSC 83Dismissed

The case concerned the self‑acquired property of Sengalani Chettiar, who had two marriages. His son Chandran (the father of the appellants) executed a release deed in 1975, relinquishing any claim to the property in return for valuable consideration, and stating he would have no further connection …

DESH RAJ & ORS.versusROHTASH SINGH

2022 INSC 1279Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, joint owners of a 23‑kanal property, entered into two sale agreements with the respondent, requiring the sale deed to be executed by 16‑08‑2004 and making earnest money forfeitable if the deadline was missed. The respondent paid part of the consideration as earnest money but failed …

M. V CHANDRAKANTHversusSANGAPPPA & ORS

2022 INSC 769Dismissed

M. V. Chandrakanth (appellant) challenged a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court that had set aside a Single Judge's order dismissing a writ petition filed by Respondent No.1, who claimed Other Backward Class (OBC) reservation as a member of the Ganiga caste. The central issue was whether a …

MRS. AKELLA LALITHAversusSRI KONDA HANUMANTHA RAO & ANR.

2022 INSC 759Case Partly allowed

The mother, Akella Lalitha, gave birth to a child with her first husband Konda Balaji, who died shortly after. She later remarried Akella Ravi Narasimha Sarma, and the child's grandparents sought guardianship and visitation, later prompting the High Court to order a restoration of the child's …

RAJESWARI CHANDRASEKAR GANESHversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2022 INSC 721Appeal(s) allowed

The petition filed by a mother under Article 32 sought a writ of habeas corpus to compel the father to return their two minor children, who were US residents, from India to the United States in accordance with a shared parenting plan ordered by an Ohio court. The Supreme Court examined whether a …

M.R. VINODAversusM.S. SUSHEELAMMA (D) BY LRS. AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 878Dismissed

The case involved three branches of a Mitakshara joint Hindu family that executed a partition deed in 1961. In 1969 the eldest brother of one branch, acting as Karta, and a cousin executed a relinquishment deed surrendering their branch's share in favour of the eldest uncle who had repaid a family …

AMAN LOHIAversusKIRAN LOHIA

2021 INSC 190Disposed off

The father (Aman Lohia) filed a guardianship petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking declaration as guardian of his two‑year‑old daughter. The mother (Kiran Lohia) did not file a written statement but filed several applications under CPC, including a …

G H JASMEET KAURversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

2019 INSC 1361Disposed off

The petitioner, a U.S. citizen, married a U.S. citizen husband and had two children who are U.S. citizens. After a visit to India, the petitioner refused to return to the United States with the children, prompting the husband to obtain custody orders in a Connecticut Superior Court and later file a …

SHEOLI HATIversusSOMNATH DAS

2019 INSC 751Disposed off

Sheoli Hati (mother) and Somnath Das (father) were divorced and disputed the custody and education of their daughter Aditi. The father, having given up his claim to custody, sought a direction that the child be admitted to a reputed boarding school at his expense, while the mother opposed this and …

TEJASWINI GAUD AND ORS.versusSHEKHAR JAGDISH PRASAD TEWARI AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 630Disposed off

The father filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking custody of his 1½‑year‑old daughter who had been looked after by the child's maternal aunt and uncle after the mother’s death and the father's prolonged illness. The High Court ordered the child be handed over to the father, granting the writ. The …

DR. AMIT KUMARversusDR. SONILA & ORS.

2018 INSC 1007Leave Granted & Allowed

Dr. Amit Kumar and Dr. Sonila, both doctors posted with the CRPF, obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent in 2016 which stipulated that custody of their two minor children would vest with the father, with each parent bearing the expenses of one child. After the father was transferred to …

JITENDER ARORA & ORS.versusSUKRITI ARORA & ORS.

2017 INSC 152Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered a custody dispute between Jitender Arora (father) and Sukriti Arora (mother) over their 15‑year‑old daughter, Vaishali. Both parents had obtained ex‑parte divorce decrees in the UK and India, and the mother filed a habeas corpus petition seeking custody. The High Court …

VIVEK SINGHversusROMANI SINGH

2017 INSC 130Directions issued

Vivek Singh (father) and Romani Singh (mother) contested custody of their minor daughter Saesha Singh. The mother filed a petition under Sections 25, 10 and 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1980 seeking custody and guardianship; the Family Court dismissed it, but the Delhi High Court granted …

NARAYANversusBABASAHEB & ORS.

2016 INSC 296Dismissed

The plaintiffs, children of a deceased father, filed a partition suit in 1989 seeking to set aside two sale deeds executed by their mother, the natural guardian, in 1982 and 1988. The mother had sold the ancestral property without court permission, allegedly in contravention of the Hindu Minority …

ABCversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2015 INSC 482Appeal(s) allowed

An unwed Christian mother filed a petition under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, seeking to be appointed guardian of her five‑year‑old son. The Guardian Court dismissed the petition because the mother refused to disclose the name and address of the child’s putative father, holding …

SURYA VADANANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2015 INSC 178Disposed off

Surya and Mayura Vadanan, both British citizens, married in India and had two daughters in the UK. In August 2012 Mayura brought the children to India and filed for divorce. Surya obtained an interim order from the High Court of Justice in England making the children wards of that court and …

ROXANN SHARMAversusARUNSHARMA

2015 INSC 129Appeal(s) allowed

The mother, Roxann Sharma, and the father, Arun Sharma, contested custody of their infant son Thalbir, who was less than five years old. The Goa civil court initially granted interim custody to the mother with visitation rights to the father. A single judge of the High Court of Bombay at Goa later …

SAROJversusSUNDER SINGH & ORS.

2013 INSC 779Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a minor daughter, along with her two sisters sued their mother (the natural guardian) to declare a sale deed of their father's ancestral land null and void. After the father's death, the mother sold the entire property to a third party, claiming the proceeds were used for the …

GAYTRI BAJAJversusJITEN BHALLA

2012 INSC 450Dismissed

The parties were married in 1992 and had two daughters. They obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent in 2003, expressly agreeing that the husband would have sole custody of the children and the wife would forego visitation rights. The wife later challenged the decree on grounds of fraud and …

SHYAMRAO MAROTI KORWATEversusDEEPAK KISANRAO TEKAM

2010 INSC 609Case Partly allowed

After the mother died shortly after giving birth, the child was placed with his maternal grandfather, who applied for guardianship under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The father also filed a petition for custody under the same Act. The District Judge appointed the grandfather as guardian until …

MOHAN KUMAR RAYANAversusKOMAL MOHAN RAYANA

2010 INSC 197Dismissed

Mohan Kumar Rayana and Komal Mohan Rayana, who were married in 2000, separated and contested custody of their daughter Anisha, born in 2002. The Family Court awarded custody to the mother with the father receiving alternate weekend visitation and a 50% share of school vacations, a decision affirmed …

MRS. SHILPA AGGARWALversusMR. AVIRAL MITIAL & ANR.

2009 INSC 1292Hearing Adjourned

The case involved a three‑year‑old girl, a British citizen by birth, whose parents, both Indian nationals, were permanent residents of the United Kingdom. After marital discord, the mother took the child to India, while the father obtained an ex‑parte order from the High Court of Justice, Family …

GAURAV NAGPALversusSUMEDHA NAGPAL

2008 INSC 1324Dismissed

The father, Gaurav Nagpal, had retained custody of his minor child after allegedly kidnapping and confining the mother, Sumedha Nagpal, and repeatedly violating court orders. The mother filed an application under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 and Section 25 of the …

NIL RATAN KUNDU & ANR.versusABHIJIT KUNDU

2008 INSC 920Case Allowed

The case concerned an application by the father, Abhijit Kundu, for custody of his six‑year‑old son Antariksh, while the child was in the care of his maternal grandparents who had lodged an FIR against the father under Sections 498A and 304 IPC for the alleged murder of the mother. The trial court …

MAUSAMI MOITRA GANGULIversusJAYANT GANGULI

2008 INSC 636Dismissed

Mausami Moitra Ganguli and Jayant Ganguli were married in 1996 and had a son in 1998. The mother left the matrimonial home in 2001 due to alleged domestic violence, leaving the three‑year‑old child with the father. After a divorce decree in 2002, the mother filed a petition under Sections 10 and 25 …

MOHAN KUMAR RAYANAversusKOMAL MOHAN RAYANA

2007 INSC 1119Disposed off

Mohan Kumar Rayana and Komal Mohan Rayana, a married couple, separated after the birth of their daughter Anisha. The mother obtained custody of the child from the Family Court, while the father was granted limited visitation rights. The Bombay High Court subsequently reduced the father's access, …

SHEILA B. DASversusP.R. SUGASREE

2006 INSC 92Disposed off

The parties were married under the Special Marriage Act and had a daughter born in 1990. The mother left the matrimonial home with the child in 2000, prompting the father to file a habeas corpus petition and applications under Sections 7 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and Section 6 of …

MADHEGOWDA (D) BY LRS.versusANKEGOWDA (D) LRS. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 575Dismissed

The appellant Madhegowda purchased the share of a minor, Sakamma, in a property from her sister Madamma, who acted as a de facto guardian, in 1961. After attaining majority, Sakamma sold the same share to Ankegowda in 1967, leading to a suit for declaration of title, partition and possession. The …

SARITA SHARMAversusSUSHIL SHARMA

2000 INSC 82Appeal(s) allowed

Sarita Sharma and Sushil Sharma, married in 1988, were involved in divorce proceedings in a Texas court which intermittently granted custody of their two minor children to the father and limited the mother to visitation. While the divorce was pending, the mother exercised her visitation rights and …

GITHA HARIHARAN AND ANR .versusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.

1999 INSC 66Disposed off

The petitioners, a mother and father, applied to the Reserve Bank of India for relief bonds in their minor son's name, with the mother signing as guardian. RBI rejected the application, insisting on the father's signature or a guardianship certificate, relying on Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority …

DIVYA DIP SINGH AND ORS.versusRAM BACHAN MISHRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1215Dismissed

The father of three minor sons filed a title suit in which the minors were added as co-plaintiffs and a court‑appointed guardian was assigned. After the suit was compromised, the father, acting as natural guardian, sold the suit land to the first respondent without obtaining prior court sanction, …

KALLATHIL SREEDHARAN AND ANR.versusKOMATH PANDYALA PRASANNA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 852Dismissed

In a partition suit, a cinema theatre was allotted to a woman and her minor son subject to payment of Rs.1,55,000 each. Unable to pay, the theatre was auctioned. The appellant advanced Rs.2,10,391 to the woman to set aside the sale, on the condition that she would sell the theatre to him for …

SRI NARAYAN BAL AND OTHERSversusSRI SRIDHAR SUTAR AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 146Dismissed

The eldest male member of a joint Hindu family, acting as Karta, together with two widows who were also guardians of their minor sons, executed a sale deed of family lands. The plaintiffs, members of the same family, challenged the sale alleging fraud and contended that the Karta lacked authority …

V. LAKSHMANANversusB. R. MANGALAGIRI AND ORS.

1994 INSC 604Dismissed

The appellant entered into an agreement to purchase six acres of land, paying Rs. 50,000 as earnest money (labelled as an advance) and agreeing to register the sale deed within six months, making time of the essence. He took possession, levelled the land and sought a layout plan, which the Gram …

PANNI LALversusRAJINDER SINGH AND ANR.

1993 INSC 184Dismissed

The mother of two minor respondents sold their land to the appellant without obtaining court permission, though the deed was attested by the father. After attaining majority, the respondents sued for possession, claiming the sale was void. The appellant argued that the father's attestation made the …

G. ANNAMALIA PILLAIversusDISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AND ORS.

1993 INSC 97Dismissed

The father of a minor leased his son's land to G. Annamalai Pillai for five years, a term that extended beyond the minor's attainment of majority, violating Section 8(2)(b) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. The minor, upon reaching majority, avoided the lease under Section 8(3), …

AMIRTIIAM KUDUMBAHversusSARNAM KUDUMBAN

1991 INSC 105Dismissed

The father, as natural guardian, sold immovable property belonging to his minor daughter without court permission and not for legal necessity, violating the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. The sale was voidable, and after attaining majority the daughter sold the property to the respondent …

SMT. SURINDAR KAUR SANDHUversusHARBAX SINGH SANDHU & ANR.

1984 INSC 79Appeal(s) allowed

Surinder Kaur Sandhu and Harbax Singh Sandhu, both Indian citizens, married in 1975 and moved to England where their son Pritpal Singh was born in 1976, making him a British citizen. After the husband was convicted for attempting to murder his wife and later removed the child to India in 1983, the …