Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

KULDIP MAHATON AND ORS.versusBHULAN MAHTO (DEAD) BY L.RS. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 56630 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Munnia, the widow of Bigu, held a life estate in property and died in 1932 before the Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937 came into force. Upon her death, the property reverted to the reversioners – the first respondent (Bhulan) and the appellants – making them co‑owners. Bhulan claimed he had been adopted by Mun

RAMBIR DAS AND ANR.versusKALYAN DAS AND ANR.

1997 INSC 16319 February 1997

The case concerned the succession to the shebaitship of the Shri Jugal Kishoreji Maharaj Mandir founded by Hari Dass. After the founder's death, his four chelas were nominated but none exercised the power to appoint a successor. The last serving chela, Bansi Dass, executed a will nominating Rambir Das and his brother a

SMT. ASS KAUR (DECEASED) BY L.RS.versusKARTAR SINGH (DEAD) BY L.RS. AND ORS.

2007 INSC 65418 May 2007Dismissed

The case concerned the inheritance of ancestral land of the Sidhu Jat community in Punjab. After the death of Relu Singh, his two widows – Sobhi and Raj Kaur – and his two sons succeeded to the estate. When the sons died without issue, the property was mutated in favour of the widows, and Raj Kaur, who had remarried he

OM PRAKASH SHARMA@O.P. JOSHIversusRAJENDRA PRASAD SHEWDA & ORS.

2015 INSC 7589 October 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over a property in Purulia that had been purchased by Jagannath Joshi with his funds but registered in his wife Moni Debi's name. The Court held that such a purchase, made for the wife's security, is a benami transaction where the wife is the real owner. The plaintiff's claim that h

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search