Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF KERALA & ANR.versusMAHESH KUMAR & ORS.

2009 INSC 23923 February 2009Dismissed

The State of Kerala introduced a "direct payment system" for staff of Dr. Padiar Memorial Homoeopathic Medical College, fixing 40 senior teaching and 50 non‑teaching staff for salary payment. Eight teaching staff members (the respondents) were excluded from the list despite holding recognized homoeopathic qualification

DR. A.K. SABHAPATHYversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 11722 April 1992Case Partly allowed

Dr. A.K. Sabhapathy challenged Kerala's use of the first proviso in Section 38 of the Travancore‑Cochin Medical Practitioners' Act, 1953, which allowed the State to exempt certain persons from the registration requirements for practising modern (allopathic) medicine. The State had issued notifications (May 4 1977, Sept

THE TEMPLE OF HANEMANN HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 61517 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether the Central Government could appoint a team of medical inspectors to inspect homoeopathy colleges, or whether that power lay exclusively with the Central Council of Homoeopathy (CCH) under the Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973. The High Court was divided: a Single Bench held that the powe

KERALA AYURVEDA PARAMPARYA VAIDYA FORUMversusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 33613 April 2018Dismissed

The Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum, an association of traditional practitioners of Ayurveda, Siddha and Unani, challenged the Travancore‑Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953 which barred them from practising unless they were registered under the Act. The Forum argued that they had long‑standing custom, inher

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search