Created by Fuzzy Cloud

I.P.C.

12 judgments · newest first · showing 1–12

GAJJI YADAV @ GAJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24-04-2026 alleging his involvement in the death of Malu Ram Yadav and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest. The FIR, filed under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the B.N.S.S., alleged that the deceased had entered the petitioner’s …

ARMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arman filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging the order dated 23‑06‑2026 of the Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO Act)‑II, Hapur, which had rejected his request to recall the victim‑witness for further cross‑examination. The trial court observed that the accused had already …

CHHOTU @ ARUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chhotu @ Arun, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a notice and a Cr.P.C. order dated 19 January 2026 and 14 July 2026, as well as the pending criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

MONTI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 833 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The …

MAKHAN LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed a Section 528 application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a warrant, notice and order dated 02‑12‑2024 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 376, 366, 363 IPC and Section …

Lalan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalan Sharma, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that he was not named in the FIR and had no relation to the co‑accused. The prosecution alleged that the informant's daughter was assaulted and possibly murdered, …

Parash Nath and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of individuals from Tehta Bazar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20-12-2017 passed by the Sub‑divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323 …

PARAVIND KUMAR VISHWAKARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate’s order dated 15‑01‑2025 that proceeded against them under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The charge‑sheet arose from a non‑cognizable report lodged on 07‑08‑2019, after which the magistrate directed …

KAMLESH VERMA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Complaint Case No. 661 of 2022 (Gauri Shankar v. Kamlesh Verma and others), which alleged an offence under Section 392 of the IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise deed, which was submitted …

Md. KalamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are neighbours, sought bail fearing arrest on charges of assault and outraging modesty under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that they assaulted the informant, but the petitioners contended that the case stemmed from an earlier …

Triful DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of women related to the deceased, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Balwa Hat P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025). The prosecution alleged that they demanded dowry, subjected the victim to cruelty and, upon non‑payment, caused her death, invoking Sections …