Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947

27 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAYversusM/S. ELEPHANTA OIL AND INDUSTRIES LTD., BOMBAY

2003 INSC 5331 January 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The Collector of Customs imposed a penalty on M/s Elephant Oil and Industries Ltd. for importing beef tallow, which was deemed a canalised item under the Import Policy. The importer argued that the Open General Licence (OGL) permitted the import and that the penalty was unwarranted after the goods were ordered to be re

AGRICULTURAL AND PROCESSED FOOD PRODUCTS ETCversusOSWAL AGRO FURANE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 59430 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Oswal Agro Furane Ltd., a 100% export‑oriented unit licensed to manufacture furfural and edible rice bran oil, sought to export non‑basmati rice and to sell the rice bran oil in the domestic market, invoking Clause 15(j) of the Export (Control) Order, 1988 as a blanket exemption. The Delhi High Court allowed these expo

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) BOMBAYversusBABU MIYA SHEIKH IMAM AND ORS. ETC.

1983 INSC 8428 July 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The Assistant Collector of Customs intercepted a fishing vessel carrying 194 ingots of silver, suspecting smuggling. The accused were convicted under several statutes, including section 135(1)(a)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Bombay High Court set aside the conviction under the Customs Act, holding that the phrase

MADAN LAL ANAND ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1989 INSC 32626 October 1989Dismissed

Madan Lal Anand and two others were detained under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) on allegations that they used benami firms to obtain duty‑exempt advance licences, imported polyester yarn, failed to export the goods as required and sold

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusM/S. JESUS SALES CORPORATION

1996 INSC 44926 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Mis. Jesus Sales Corporation, was licensed to import brass scrap under a duty‑exemption scheme and was required to export a specified quantity. A show‑cause notice under Section 4‑M of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 led to a penalty of Rs 6 lakh. The respondent appealed the penalty and soug

T.J. STEPHEN & ORS.versusPARLE BOTTLING CO. (P) LTD. & ORS.

1988 INSC 8022 March 1988Disposed off

The Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports filed a complaint under Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 against Parle Bottling Co. Ltd. and its Managing Director, alleging contravention of licence conditions. The complaint was transferred to another magistrate court, where cognizance was tak

UNION OF INDIAversusSAMPAT RAJ DUGAR AND ANR.

1992 INSC 1521 January 1992Dismissed

The Union of India and the Collector of Customs appealed against a Bombay High Court order that allowed the exporter S.R. Dugar to re‑export four consignments of raw silk yarn. The silk had been imported by Ms. Renu Pahilaj under an advance import licence that was later cancelled. The licence required the silk to be us

ROCHE PRODUCTS LIMITEDversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ANOTHER

1989 INSC 31419 October 1989Dismissed

Roche Products Ltd, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, imported the raw material isoxamine under an Open General Licence after the two‑year period permitted by its industrial licence for the manufacture of sulphamethoxazole (SMX) had expired. The company declared itself an "Actual User" and that its registration was not ca

OSWAL SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS & ANR.

1988 INSC 10919 April 1988Disposed off

Oswal Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd imported 58 bales of woollen rags, which Customs officials later identified as acrylic rags and confiscated under the Customs Act. The importer was offered the option to pay a redemption fine under section 125; the fine was reduced by the Board and the goods were ordered to be mutilat

UNION OF INDIAversusM/S. MUSTAFA AND NAJIBAI TRADING CO. AND ORS.

1998 INSC 26016 July 1998Case Allowed

The Union of India appealed against the Bombay High Court's order that set aside the customs collector's confiscation of prohibited goods and the vessel MANSC0‑3 under Sections 111(d), 111(f) and 115(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The High Court had held that the vessel's arrival time for the 24‑hour import‑manifest dead

PRIYANKA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 35315 November 1990Dismissed

Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd. imported 10,681.832 metric tonnes of palm kernel from Nigeria in 1987 under an Open General Licence (OGL). The Customs authorities treated palm kernel as a canalised item, confiscated the goods and imposed a redemption fine and penalty. The company argued that palm kernel is distinct from pa

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusM/S INDUSIND BANK LTD. & ANR.

2016 INSC 86915 September 2016Dismissed

The Union of India sought payment under bank guarantees issued by exporters for extra‑long‑staple cotton exports. The guarantees, dated 31‑Jan‑1996, contained a clause that extinguished the bank's liability if a claim was not made within three months of the guarantee's expiry. The Textile Commissioner invoked the guara

JAIN EXPORTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 22714 July 1993Dismissed

The appellants, Jain Exports Pvt. Ltd. and others, imported two consignments of refined industrial coconut oil in 1982 under an Open General Licence, but the 1980‑81 Import Policy listed coconut oil as a canalised item that could be imported only through the State Trading Corporation. The Customs Collector ordered conf

MJ. EXPORTS LTD. AND ANR.versusCUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE

1992 INSC 16214 May 1992Dismissed

MJ Exports Ltd., a recognised trading house, imported haemodialysers from West Germany under an Open General Licence (OGL) for "stock and sale" and cleared them for "home consumption" free of duty. The goods were repacked in India and exported to the USSR. Customs detained the goods, deeming the re‑export impermissible

AKBAR BADRUDIN JIWANIversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY

1990 INSC 3814 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a stone‑processing firm, imported calcareous stone slabs from Italy, obtaining certificates and expert reports that the material was not marble. Customs seized the goods, classifying them as "marble" under tariff entry 25.15 and the restricted item 62 of the Import‑Export Policy, and ordered confiscation

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE & ANR.versusR.K. UPPAL

2011 INSC 57511 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, R.K. Uppal, a senior manager of Oriental Bank of Commerce, was dismissed after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of misconduct. He appealed the dismissal under Regulation 17 of the Bank's Discipline and Appeal Regulations, 1982, also seeking a personal hearing, but the appellate authority denied t

J.P. SHARMAversusVINOD KUMAR JAIN

1986 INSC 678 April 1986

The case arose from a complaint filed by the Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports alleging that several directors of Jain Sudh Vanaspati Ltd. conspired to illegally import beef tallow in violation of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 and Section 120B of the IPC. The Delhi High Court, invoking Sectio

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KOLKATTAversusM/S. GRAND PRIME LIMITED AND ORS.

2003 INSC 3057 July 2003Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Grand Prime Ltd. imported raw silk and other silk products into Kolkata using an advance licence that was later found to be forged and was subject to a condition of re‑export. The importer failed to comply with the re‑export condition, did not appear before customs, and did not file a bill of entry, prompting the

M/S. YASHA OVERSEASversusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX & ORS.

2008 INSC 5866 May 2008Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a batch of six appeals concerning the taxability of Replenishment Licences (REP licences) and the Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) scheme under various State sales tax statutes. The appellants argued that the three‑judge decision in Vikas Sales Corporation v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTAversusSANJAY CHANDIRAM

1995 INSC 3395 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Collector of Customs appealed against the CEGAT order that had accepted the importer’s declared price for zip rolls as the transaction value despite the importer’s forged certificate of North Korean origin. The Supreme Court held that Rules 3 and 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules presume a genuine transaction value

DY. CHIEF CONTROLLER OF IMPORTS AND EXPORTSversusROSHANLAL AGARWAL AND ORS.

2003 INSC 1465 March 2003Disposed off

The Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports filed complaints against Roshanlal Agarwal and others under several IPC sections and Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947. The complaints were tried before a Special Court (Economic Offences) constituted by a Karnataka notification that created a Ju

RAJ PRAKASH CHEMICALS LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 275 March 1986Dismissed

Raj Prakash Chemicals Ltd., the sole Indian manufacturer of acrylic ester monomers, challenged the grant of Additional Licences to diamond exporters that allowed import of those monomers despite their being placed in the "Limited Permissible" list under the Import Policy 1985‑88. The core issue was the meaning of "spec

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusM/S. B.T. PATIL AND SONS BELGAUM (CONSTRUCTION) PVT. LTD

2024 INSC 835 February 2024Dismissed

The respondent, a class‑I civil contractor, completed work on the Koyna Hydro Electric Project funded by the World Bank and claimed duty drawback as a "deemed export" under the Exim Policy 1992‑1997. After multiple rejections by the DGFT, a Policy Interpretation Committee in 2002 allowed the drawback, which was paid in

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusMOHD. Y AKUB S/0 ABDUL HAMID & ORS.

1980 INSC 404 March 1980Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra charged three men with attempting to smuggle 43 silver ingots out of India, violating the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the Imports and Exports (Control) Act and the Customs Act. The accused, who were the driver of a jeep, the driver of a truck and a cleaner, argued that they were unaware of

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSUKSHA INTERNATIONAL AND NUTAN GEMS & ANR.

1989 INSC 12 January 1989Disposed off

The Union of India appealed against two Bombay High Court judgments that had ordered the revalidation and endorsement of imprest licences held by Suksha International and Nutan Gems, recognised export houses for importing uncut diamonds. The respondents claimed that after fulfilling their export obligations they were e

LIBERTY OIL MILLS & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS.

1984 INSC 981 May 1984Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a series of "abeyance circulars" issued under clause 8B of the Imports (Control) Order, 1955, which placed the licence applications of Liberty Oil Mills and 60 other concerns in abeyance pending investigation into alleged illegal import of beef tallow. The petitioners contende

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search