Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Income Tax Act, 1922

150 judgments · newest first · showing 1–150

MAHABIR INDUSTRIESversusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2018 INSC 543Appeal(s) allowed

Mahabir Industries, a polythene manufacturer in Himachal Pradesh, claimed tax deductions under Section 80‑IA for two years, then under Section 80‑IB for five years, and after a substantial expansion in AY 2006‑07, under Section 80‑IC. The Assessing Officer allowed the 100% deduction for AY 2006‑07 …

PURNIMA MANTHENA AND ANOTHERversusDR. RENUKA DATLA & OTHERS

2015 INSC 738Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose in Biological E. Ltd. after the death of its promoter, when the widow (respondent No.1) and her three daughters were appointed directors. The widow challenged the validity of board meetings held on 9‑4‑2013, 10‑4‑2013 and 11‑4‑2013, the appointment of her daughters as directors and …

SHABINAABRAHAM & ORS.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

2015 INSC 528Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a show‑cause notice issued under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 for alleged short levy of excise duty by a sole proprietor who died in 1989. The legal heirs challenged the notice, arguing that the Act contains no provision to continue assessment against a dead person’s …

BALAJI STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLSversusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS

2014 INSC 1028Appeal(s) allowed

Balaji Steel Re‑rolling Mills, a partnership engaged in manufacturing hot re‑rolled products, challenged an order of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs that fixed its production capacity and duty liability. The matter was remanded by the Appellate Tribunal, but on a later appeal the …

ARUN KUMAR AGGARWALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

2011 INSC 644Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant complained to the Lokayukta that three government officials had caused a loss of Rs.4 crore to the State of Madhya Pradesh by purchasing land at inflated prices. The Lokayukta police investigated, exonerated the officials and filed a closure report under Section 169 of the Cr.P.C. …

UDAIPUR SAHAKARI UPBHOKTA THOK BHANDAR LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

2009 INSC 924Dismissed

Udaipur Sahakari Upbhokta Thok Bhandar Ltd., a cooperative society dealing in both non‑controlled and government‑authorised controlled commodities, claimed a deduction under Section 80P(2)(e) of the Income‑Tax Act for commissions received for storing foodgrains under the Rajasthan Foodgrains Order. …

PRADIP J. MEHTAversusCOMMNR. OF INCOME-TAX, AHMEDABAD

2008 INSC 488Case Allowed

The appellant, a marine engineer employed abroad, claimed "not ordinarily resident" status for AY 1982‑83 under s.6(6)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to exclude his foreign income under s.5(1)(c). The Assessing Officer rejected the claim, holding that the appellant had been resident in India for …

SYNDICATE BANKversusESTATE OFFICER & MANAGER, A.P.I.I.C. LTD. & ORS.

2007 INSC 885Matter referred to larger bench

Syndicate Bank advanced a loan to United Auto Tractor Ltd. secured by a mortgage on 51 acres of land allotted by the Andhra Pradesh Government, relying on an allotment letter and a consent letter from the Director of Industries. The land was later partially cancelled and the allotment rescinded by …

M/S. GEORGE WILLIAMSON (ASSAM) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GAUHATI

2005 INSC 430Appeal(s) allowed

Mis. George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. acquired the Indian undertakings of twelve UK‑registered tea companies under a scheme of arrangement approved by the High Courts and the RBI, which required that the net assets of the acquired business not be depleted. The consideration paid (Rs 490 lakhs) was …

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusAZADI BACHAO ANDOLAN AND ANR.

2003 INSC 526Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Central Board of Direct Taxes' Circular No. 789, issued under Section 119 of the Income‑Tax Act, was ultra vires the Act and whether the Indo‑Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Convention (DTAC), notified under Section 90, could override inconsistent …

N. BAGAVATHY AMMALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI AND ANR.

2003 INSC 39Dismissed

The appellants, two sisters who were shareholders of a company in liquidation, received agricultural land as part of the distribution of the company's assets. The Assessing Officer treated the market value of the land as a capital gain under Section 46(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and levied tax. …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusM.V. VALLIAPPAN AND ORS.

1999 INSC 289Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) that was a partner in a firm, effected a partial partition on 13‑April‑1979 and the Income Tax Officer (ITO) recognised it under Section 171(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For AY 1980‑81 the HUF filed a return excluding income from the partitioned …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANAversusOM PRAKASH

1999 INSC 290Disposed off

The respondent, Om Prakash, was a partner in two partnership firms in his capacity as Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). The Income Tax Officer included the share of income earned by his minor children in his total income under Section 64(1)(i) and (ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The …

K.S. SUBBIAH PILLAIversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1999 INSC 94Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), was assessed for several years on the ground that remuneration and commission received by its Karta, K.S. Subbiah Pillai, were income of the HUF. The Madras High Court held the amounts were assessable to the HUF, while the Andhra Pradesh High Court had …

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (LEGAL) AND ANR.versusM/S JYOTI TRADERS AND ANR. ETC.

1998 INSC 438Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a sales‑tax assessment for the year 1985‑86, completed before the expiry of the four‑year limitation under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, could be reopened after the legislature enlarged the limitation to eight years by inserting a proviso in the 1991 …

M/S W.T. SUREN AND CO. LTDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY

1998 INSC 111Appeal(s) allowed

W.T. Suren & Co. Ltd transferred its distribution unit to Rallis India Ltd, terminating the employment of the unit's staff. Employees were offered similar jobs with continuity of service; those who did not join received gratuity directly, while the assessee paid the gratuity due to those who joined …

HUNGERFORD INVESTMENT TRUST LTD.versusINCOME TAX OFFICERS AND ORS.

1998 INSC 96Dismissed

Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd., a Singapore‑registered non‑resident company owning 100% of the Indian firm Turner Morrison & Co., was deemed to have received dividends from the undistributed income of the Indian company under Section 23A of the pre‑1955 Income‑Tax Act, 1922. The Income‑Tax Officer …

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRASversusURMILA RAMESH

1998 INSC 40Dismissed

The respondents, shareholders of a company in voluntary liquidation, received dividends from the liquidator after the sale of the company's assets. The sale proceeds exceeded the written‑down value of the assets but were less than the original purchase price, so the excess was taxed in the company …

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, GUJARAT-III, AHMEDABADversusELLIS BRIDGE GYMKHANA ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 704Case Partly allowed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat sought to assess Ellis Bridge Gymkhana, an unincorporated club, for wealth tax for assessment years 1970‑71 to 1977‑78, arguing that the club fell within the term “individual” in Section 3 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The club contended that an association of …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusM/S. AMALGAMATION PVT. LTD.

1997 INSC 436Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Amalgamation Pvt. Ltd., a bulk shareholder holding investments in numerous subsidiaries, could claim a capital loss on the forced sale of shares to a subsidiary of a subsidiary, whether a loss incurred while guaranteeing a subsidiary's loan qualified as a business …

TATAVARTHI RAJAH AND ANR.versusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, HYDERABAD

1997 INSC 368Dismissed

The appellants, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) of four members, filed a suit for partition in 1954, with a final decree in 1961. The Wealth Tax Officer assessed the family for assessment years 1958-59, 1959-60 and 1960-61, treating it as an undivided family of four members because no physical …

AS. GLITTRE D/5 I/S GARONNE AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA-II

1997 INSC 358Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, non‑resident ship owners, had tax assessed on their shipping earnings under Section 172(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and paid the tax. They later exercised their right under Section 172(7) to obtain a regular assessment, which showed that the tax previously paid was in excess. The …

ASSOCIATED STONE INDUSTRIES (KOTAH) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJASTHAN

1997 INSC 110Disposed off

Associated Stone Industries (Kotah) Ltd., a quarrying company, paid royalty to the Maharao of Kotah under a lease that stipulated a minimum payment of Rs.1,50,000 and additional amounts in lieu of income‑tax, super‑tax and excess‑profits tax. After the merger of Kotah into Rajasthan, the Income‑Tax …

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRASversusURMILA RAMESH ETC.

1997 INSC 104Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the Commissioner of Income‑Tax against shareholders of the liquidated Tinnevelly Motor Service Company who had received dividends from the liquidator. The revenue argued that amounts assessed under Section 41(2) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 – representing …

MIS. BALLIMAL NA VAL KISH ORE AND ANR.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY

1997 INSC 15Dismissed

The appellant, who owned a cinema theatre converted from a former ginning factory, incurred large expenditures in 1960‑61 for new machinery, furniture, sanitary and electrical fittings, and extensive structural repairs. The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 10(2)(v) of the Income Tax Act, …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSARversusM/S SHIV PRAKASH JANAK RAJ AND CO. PVT. LTD.

1996 INSC 1127Case Partly allowed

The assessee company had advanced a loan to a firm whose partners were also its shareholders and directors. Interest was charged on the loan in the 1966-67 and 1967-68 assessment years, establishing it as an interest‑bearing loan. For the 1968-69 assessment year the company passed a resolution …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARATversusSHRI UDAYAN CHINUBHAI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 907Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, former members of a Joint Hindu Family, received specific assets and certain family debts after a partition ordered by an arbitrator's award. They claimed that interest paid on these debts, especially to unsecured creditors, should be deductible as a diversion of income by an …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusKARAM CHAND THAPAR AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 885Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, Karam Chand Thapar & others, acted as a del credere agent for coal collieries and as an agent for coal purchasers. It claimed "under‑charges" from collieries for freight overcharges on under‑loaded wagons, received the amounts before any purchaser claim, and paid purchasers when they …

M/S. WILH, WILHELMSENversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL-I

1996 INSC 694Dismissed

The appellant, a Norwegian shipping company, was assessed for AY 1958‑59 on the basis of separate Indian‑trade accounts. The Income Tax Officer, following Central Board instructions issued under Rule 33 and Section 5(8) of the Income Tax Act, disallowed depreciation on eight ships that had been in …

THE III INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE - I, SALEM AND ANR.versusARUNAGIRI CHETTIAR

1996 INSC 636Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Arunagiri Chettriar, retired from a partnership firm in 1963 and later the firm was dissolved. The Income Tax Officer issued a notice that the respondent was jointly and severally liable for tax arrears of the firm for assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64, arguing that liability …

RAMESH NARAIN SAXENA AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

1996 INSC 560Dismissed

The appellant, an exporter of hides and skins, pledged goat skins to a bank and obtained an overdraft. The skins were damaged due to the bank's improper storage, leading the appellant to file a criminal complaint. A compromise was reached whereby the bank waived Rs 1,93,159 owed by the appellant, …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusM/S ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.

1996 INSC 346Dismissed

All India Tea and Trading Co. Ltd. received Rs. 1,24,638 as compensation when its agricultural land in Assam was requisitioned under the Assam Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 and allotted to refugees who continued to cultivate it. The company claimed the compensation was agricultural …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXversusMANOHARLAL GUPTA AND CO.

1996 INSC 23Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant‑Commissioner of Income Tax appealed against the Calcutta High Court’s decision that the assessment of Manoharlal Gupta & Co. as an unregistered firm for AY 1961‑62 was improper. The firm had been assessed by one Income‑Tax Officer (ITO‑C) while a partner, Manoharlal Gupta, had earlier …

COMMISSIONER_ OF INCOME TAX, KANPURversusKAMLA TOWN TRUST

1995 INSC 741Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two tax disputes. In Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur v. Kamla Town Trust, a trust created in 1941 for workers’ housing was rectified in 1945 and 1955; the Court held that the 1945 deed did not create a public charitable trust, denying exemption for 1949‑55, but the 1955 …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS AND ANR.versusMIS DALMIA CEMENT

1995 INSC 462Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Dalmia Cement, a public limited company, filed loss returns for assessment years 1952‑53 to 1954‑55 after the prescribed time. The Income Tax Officer refused to take cognizance of those returns, stating that no assessment could be made. For later years (1955‑56 to 1959‑60) losses were assessed, …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT, AHMEDABADversusSMT. KAMALTNI KHATAU

1994 INSC 198

The Supreme Court examined whether the tax authorities could choose to assess tax on either the trustees or the beneficiaries of a discretionary trust when the trust's income was distributed and actually received by the beneficiaries during the accounting year. The respondent, a beneficiary of six …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusT.G. LAKSHMAIAH SETTY AND SONS

1994 INSC 157Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, T.G. Lakshmaiah Setty & Sons, a dealer in groundnut oil and cotton seeds, was assessed under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 for the years 1967‑68, 1970‑71 and 1971‑72 on cotton lint at 3% as an unclassified good. Relying on Alimchand Topandas Oil Mills, they argued that …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusRAM KUMAR AGGARWAL AND BROS.

1993 INSC 354

The assessee, a partnership firm dealing in shares, bought all equity shares of a company in 1945 and treated those shares as stock-in-trade for tax purposes. When the company was liquidated, the liquidator distributed a surplus to the shareholders, and the assessee received Rs. 32,25,550. The …

CIT MADRAS AND ANR.versusDALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD.

1993 INSC 302Matter referred to larger bench

The assessee filed loss returns for assessment years 1950-51 to 1955-56 after the statutory period, and the Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) communicated that no cognizance could be taken. Later, the assessee claimed set‑off of those losses against income of 1960-61 and 1961-62, and the Income Tax Appellate …

SHRIYANS PRASAD JAIN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1993 INSC 295

Shriyans Prasad Jain, a former officer of Dalmia Cement & Paper Marketing Co., was paid Rs 7 lakhs on termination of his services and claimed the sum was compensation for loss of employment, exempt under section 7 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922. The assessment tribunal, High Court and the Supreme Court …

PHOOL CHAND BAJRANG LAL AND ANR.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR.

1993 INSC 226Dismissed

The assessee firm claimed a cash loan of Rs 50,000 from a Calcutta company and claimed interest deductions for several years. The Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) in Azamgarh, after receiving a specific letter from the ITO in Calcutta stating that the Calcutta company was merely a name‑lender and had not …

NAGARMAL BAIJNATHversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1993 INSC 117Dismissed

M/s. Nagarmal Baijnath, a partnership firm, was dissolved on 2 December 1946 and its business was discontinued. Income‑tax and excess‑profits‑tax assessments for the years 1946‑47 and 1947‑48 were nonetheless made in the name of the firm after its dissolution. The assessee initially raised no …

KARAMCHAND PREMCHAND PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1993 INSC 68Dismissed

Karamchand Premchand Pvt. Ltd. set aside Rs 4,50,000 as a provision for a possible tax liability under Section 23A of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922. The company later claimed that this amount was a reserve and should be included in its capital for the purposes of Rule 1 of the Second Schedule of the …

ESCORTS LIMITED AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 292Dismissed

Escorts Ltd. and other assessees challenged the Finance (No.2) Act, 1980 amendment that gave retrospective effect to clause (iv) of Section 35(2) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, arguing it allowed a double deduction for scientific‑research expenditure and violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the …

R.K. DEOversusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, ORISSA.

1992 INSC 157Dismissed

R.K. Deo, the former Raja of Jeypore, claimed a deduction of Rs 6,69,766, the income‑tax liability on his forest income, while computing his net wealth under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 for the assessment years 1962‑63 to 1965‑66. The liability had been affirmed by the Supreme Court in 1958, a fresh …

BAJAJ TEMPO LTD., BOMBAYversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY CITY-III, BOMBAY

1992 INSC 125Appeal(s) allowed

Bajaj Tempo Ltd. was incorporated to exploit a government licence for manufacturing tempo vehicles and took over a factory of its promoter corporation, occupying the premises on lease and receiving tools worth Rs.3,500. The company claimed a partial exemption from tax under Section 15C of the Income …

DAGI RAM PINDI LAL AND ANRversusTRILOK CHAND JAIN AND ORS.

1992 INSC 37Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff sought recovery of a sum and, during trial, obtained court summons for the Income Tax Department to produce assessment records of the defendants for years 1964-65 to 1971-72. The Department produced the records in sealed covers, claiming privilege under the then‑applicable Section 137 …

RADHASOAMI SATSANG, SAOMI BAGH,AGRAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1991 INSC 297Appeal(s) allowed

The Radhasoami Satsang, a religious institution, had its income assessed as taxable for several years after an earlier period of exemption, prompting the assessee to challenge the assessments before the Income‑Tax Tribunal, which held that the income was exempt under sections 11 and 12 of the …

CHANDRAKANT MANILAL SHAH AND ANR.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY-II

1991 INSC 271Appeal(s) allowed

The Karta of a Hindu undivided family (HUF) converted the family cloth business into a partnership with his son, who contributed only his skill and labour and no cash. The Income‑Tax Officer refused to register the firm, a decision upheld by the Appellate Tribunal and the Bombay High Court. The …

MAHADEO PRASAD BAIS (DEAD}versusINCOME-TAX OFFICER 'A' WARD, GORAKHPUR AND ATJR.

1991 INSC 230Dismissed

Mahadeo Prasad Bais, as Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family, was assessed as a HUF up to AY 1948‑49 and thereafter filed individual returns claiming total or partial partition. The Tribunal and the High Court later accepted a partial partition, making certain family income assessable to him …

BADAL RAM LAXMI NARAINversusC.I.T. LUCKNOW

1991 INSC 150Appeal(s) allowed

The partners of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) formed a partnership firm after a partial partition of the family business, which was run on borrowed capital. The firm took over the HUF's assets and a debit balance of Rs.1,75,310, which was transferred to the partners' personal accounts. The firm …

MOTILAL CHHADAMI LAL JAINversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ETC.

1991 INSC 95Appeal(s) allowed

The Hindu Undivided Family (M.C. Jain) leased its premises to Jain Glass Works Ltd for an annual rent of Rs 21,000, of which Rs 10,000 was contractually payable directly to a college run by a charitable trust. The Court held that this arrangement is merely a self‑imposed application of income and …

A.L.A. FIRMversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1991 INSC 59Dismissed

The appellant, A.L.A. Firm, a partnership engaged in money‑lending and property transactions, was dissolved on 13 March 1961 and reported a revaluation surplus of $1,01,248 (Rs.1,58,057) in its 1961‑62 return, treating it as neither revenue nor capital. The Income‑Tax Officer initially accepted this …

BABULAL NAROTIAMDAS AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

1990 INSC 387Dismissed

The appellant, a managing agent, was entitled under a company resolution dated 20 July 1949 to receive an extra remuneration of Rs 15,000 per annum. Shareholders sued to enjoin the payment, claiming the resolution illegal; the trial court decreed in their favour but the High Court reversed, …

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK AND ORS.versusBIJU PATNAIK

1990 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Biju Patnaik, was assessed for the year 1957-58 but allegedly failed to disclose a Rs.15 lakh capital gain from the sale of his mining business. The Income Tax Officer, after obtaining approval, issued a notice under sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to reopen the …

RAMPUR DISTILLERY AND CHEMICALS CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LUCKNOW

1990 INSC 364Appeal(s) allowed

Rampur Distillery, a limited company, claimed that a dividend in specie (shares of Dalmia Cement) declared by two sugar companies in January 1952 should be taxed in the 1952‑53 assessment year. The dividend was declared and the shares were placed with trustees for distribution, but an injunction …

SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL III, CALCUTTA

1990 INSC 320Dismissed

Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd., a British India resident company, sold cloth in both British India and native states. For the years 1945-46 to 1947-48 it was taxed under Section 42(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 on one‑third of the profit from native‑state sales as deemed accrued in British India, and …

POONJABHAI VARMALIDASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD

1990 INSC 311Dismissed

The assessee, Poonjabhai Varmalidas, had written off certain debts as bad under Section 10(2)(xi) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 in 1959‑60. His business ceased before the amounts were later recovered in the assessment years 1964‑65, 1965‑66 and 1967‑68, after the 1961 Act had repealed the 1922 Act. …

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CALICUTversusSMT. N.K. SARADA THAMPATTY

1990 INSC 280Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a member of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), claimed that a partition agreement dated 3 July 1958 and a subsequent civil court decree had dissolved the HUF, so that the family could not be taxed as a HUF for assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. The Income Tax Officer …

JUTE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

1990 INSC 267Disposed off

The Jute Corporation of India Ltd. was assessed for income tax for AY 1974-75 and later claimed a deduction of Rs.11,54,995 for its liability to Purchase Tax, an issue not raised before the Income Tax Officer. While hearing its appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the corporation was …

SURYAKUMAR GOVINDJEEversusKRISHNAMMAL AND ORS.

1990 INSC 163Dismissed

The appellant and respondent entered into a lease in 1936 for vacant land, a well and a structure called a "kaichalai" to operate a petrol pump. The lease was repeatedly extended, and the lessor later sought eviction under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, claiming demolition …

KESHAVJI RAVJI & CO. ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1990 INSC 26Appeal(s) allowed

The partnership firm Keshavji Ravji & Co. paid interest to its partners on their capital credits and also received interest from the same partners on borrowings during the assessment year 1975-76. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest paid to partners without setting off the interest …

MAHARANA MILLS PVT. LTD.versusINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD & ORS.

1989 INSC 177Dismissed

Maharana Mills, a textile manufacturer in Saurashtra, challenged assessments for 1957-60 on the ground that the Central Government’s 1956 Explanation added to the 1950 Removal of Difficulties Order was ultra vires and that depreciation should be computed only on the basis of the actual depreciation …

CLAGGETT BRACHI CO. LTD., LONDONversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, A.P.

1989 INSC 142Dismissed

Claggett Branch Ltd., a non‑resident company dealing in tobacco, had its income for assessment years 1959‑60 and 1960‑61 originally assessed on the basis of returns filed by its Indian agents under s.23(3) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922. While assessing the later year 1962‑63 the Income‑Tax Officer …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAYversusRASIKLAL MANEKLAL (H.U.F.) & ORS.

1989 INSC 106Dismissed

The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family, owned 90 shares of Shorrock Co. which was amalgamated into New Shorrock Co. under a court‑sanctioned scheme that allotted the assessee 45 shares of the new company for every two shares held in the old company. The Commissioner of Income Tax treated the receipt …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOWversusU.P. COOPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.

1989 INSC 51Disposed off

The U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd., an apex cooperative society, received interest of Rs.9,000 on a cash security of Rs.2 lakh furnished to a cooperative sugar factory under an agency agreement, and interest of Rs.51,295 on loans advanced to its member societies for sugar distribution. The Revenue …

DR. BALIRAM WAMAN HIRAYversusJUSTICE B. LENTIN AND OTHERS

1988 INSC 272Case Allowed

The State of Maharashtra appointed Justice B. Lentin as a one‑man Commission of Inquiry to investigate the death of 14 patients at J.J. Hospital. The Commission found the appellant, Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray, gave contradictory evidence and issued a show‑cause notice for perjury under s.193 IPC read …

TATA TEA LTD. & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. ETC.

1988 INSC 144Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by Tata Tea Ltd. and other tea companies challenging amendments made by the West Bengal and Kerala legislatures that sought to tax the entire income from the sale of tea grown and manufactured by the assessees. The petitioners argued that only 60% of …

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

1988 INSC 73Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board was required under the Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962 to insure its distribution and transmission lines against war‑risk damage. The Director of the Emergency Risks Insurance Scheme fixed a balance premium of Rs 47,59,109, which the Board …

SETH BANARSI DASS GUPTA & ANR. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI.

1987 INSC 139Dismissed

Banarsi Das, a partner who acquired a one‑sixth share in a sugar mill, received periodic payments from other partners under lease arrangements after the firm was placed under a court‑appointed receiver. The assessee claimed that these receipts were capital in nature and that depreciation could be …

R.K.UPADHYAYAversusSHANABHAI P. PATEL

1987 INSC 137Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent challenged a notice of reassessment issued under section 147(b) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1965‑66, arguing that the notice was barred by the statutory limitation. The Gujarat High Court quashed the notice, relying on the earlier Banarsi Debi decision which …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KANPURversusBEHARI LAL RAM CHARAN LTD.

1987 INSC 126Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income‑Tax appealed against the Allahabad High Court’s decision in favour of Behari Lal Ram Charan Ltd, which allowed the company to set off a capital loss of Rs 3,17,500 incurred in assessment year (AY) 1957‑58 against capital gains of Rs 3,10,200 in AY 1965‑66. The Revenue …

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CALCUTTA & ORS.versusRADHESHYAM LADIA

1987 INSC 121Dismissed

The respondent, Radheshyam, was assessed for the years 1960-61, 1961-62 and 1962-63 and was served notices under sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Income‑Tax Officer alleged that his wife had received valuable assets from him without adequate consideration and that the income …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P.versusSHAH SADIQ AND SONS.

1987 INSC 108Dismissed

Shah Sadiq & Sons, a partnership firm registered under the Income Tax Act, incurred speculation losses of Rs 60,054 in AY 1960‑61 and Rs 6,839 in AY 1961‑62 and claimed to set them off against a profit of Rs 58,102 in AY 1962‑63. The Income‑Tax Officer rejected the claim, holding that, for a …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTAversusT.I. & M. SALES LTD.

1987 INSC 101Dismissed

The assessee, T.I. & M. Sales Ltd., was assessed as a representative assessee for ten non‑resident companies and the Revenue claimed a "business connection" under Section 9 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, making the Indian company an agent under Section 163(1)(b). The assessee contended that no such …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P., LUCKNOWversusBRITISH INDIA CORPN. LTD., KANPUR

1987 INSC 31Dismissed

British India Corp Ltd entered into an agreement with Charles Walker & Co. to obtain technical know‑how, use certain trademarks and receive specialised tanning processes. Paragraph 7 of that agreement required the company to appoint Textile & General Supplies, a nominee of Charles Walker, as its …

C.I.T., ANDHRA PRADESHversusTRUSTEES OF H.E.H., THE NIZAM'S FAMILY TRUST

1986 INSC 208Dismissed

The Nizam of Hyderabad created a family trust in 1950, dividing the corpus into a Reserve Fund and a Family Trust Expenses Account, each with distinct purposes. The income of these two funds was assessed separately for 1960‑61 and 1961‑62, but the Income‑Tax Officer later reopened the assessments …

LAGDISH SUGAR MILLS LTD.versusTHE C.I.T LUCKNOW

1986 INSC 136Dismissed

Jagdish Sugar Mills, a liquidated public company, was ordered to pay arrears of cane‑cess and its mills were attached and auctioned on 10 November 1955. The sale certificate under Rule 285‑M of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules was issued on 4 July 1956, after objections were …

C.I.T. BOMBAY CITYversusBOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION, BOMBAY

1986 INSC 144Dismissed

The Bombay-based Burmah Trading Corporation held fifteen forest leases in Burma for timber extraction. After the Union of Burma nationalised the forest resources, the company surrendered its residuary rights and assets in exchange for 43,860 tons of teak logs, some in lieu of non‑duty paid logs and …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHIversusMAHALAXMI SUGAR MILLS CO. LTD.

1986 INSC 129Appeal(s) allowed

Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Ltd., a sugar manufacturer in India, held shares in a Pakistani sugar company and earned substantial dividend income in the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58 while incurring large business losses in India. The company claimed that the dividend, which was not taxable in India …

UNION OF INDIAversusRAJESWARI AND CO, & ORS.

1986 INSC 132Dismissed

The Union of India sued Rajeswari & Co. for a declaration that the sale of movable and immovable assets of Krishna Oil Mills and Industries Ltd. to Rajeswari & Co. was void under section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, alleging that the transfer was intended to defeat the Union's tax claim. The …

INDIAN OIL CORPORATIONversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE V, CALCUTTA & ORS.

1986 INSC 115Appeal(s) allowed

The Indian Oil Corporation, a UK‑incorporated company with its principal place of business in India, claimed large deductions for London management expenses incurred by its parent company, Burmah Oil Co. Ltd., in its income‑tax returns for the years 1957‑58 to 1959‑60. The Assessing Officer, relying …

K. GEORGE THOMASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, KERALA

1986 INSC 99Dismissed

K. George Thomas, an individual who owned a printing press and a daily newspaper, received Rs.5,85,637 from the United States in his capacity as Vice‑President of the India Gospel Mission. The funds were credited to a bank account in the name of the Mission but were largely used for the newspaper’s …

NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.versusSITARAM MILLS LTD. & ORS. ETC.

1986 INSC 61Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the surplus lands owned by Shree Sitaram Mills formed part of the "assets in relation to the textile undertaking" under sub‑section (2) of section 3 of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983. The mill, a sick textile undertaking, had been …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX U.P, LUCKNOWversusJ.K. HOSIERY FACTORY, KANPUR

1986 INSC 48Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether an unregistered partnership firm that became a registered firm could carry forward unabsorbed depreciation from the year it was unregistered (1949-50) and set it off against the partners' income in the subsequent year (1950-51). The Tribunal had denied the set‑off, …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ORISSAversusORISSA CORPORATION (P) LTD.

1986 INSC 50Dismissed

The assessee, Orissa Corporation, claimed a cash credit of Rs 1,50,000 as loans from three individuals, producing confirmation letters and hundis but could not serve notices under s.131 to the alleged lenders. The Income‑Tax Officer deemed the lenders “name‑lenders”, added the amount as unproved …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusSHIVAKAMI CO. PVT. LTD.

1986 INSC 44Dismissed

Shivakami Co. Pvt. Ltd., a private company, sold unquoted shares of two other companies and claimed a loss. The Income‑Tax Officer, relying on the first proviso to section 12B(2) of the 1922 Income‑Tax Act (now section 52 of the 1961 Act), deemed the break‑up values of the shares and assessed …

S.P. GRAMOPHONE COMPANYversusC.I.T PATIALA

1986 INSC 9Dismissed

The appellant, S.P. Gramophone Co., sought registration of its partnership under Section 26A of the Income Tax Act, 1922 for AY 1961‑62 after a fresh partnership deed added four new partners to the original two, who were disabled. The Income Tax Officer rejected the application, alleging that the …

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHIversusBANSI DHAR & SONS

1985 INSC 252Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) that received Rs.2,49,874 as insurance proceeds after the death of the Karta's father. The income from this amount was initially taxed in the Karta's personal assessment, but the Income Tax Officer later treated it as HUF income, leading to …

MAYA RANI PUNJversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI,

1985 INSC 248

Maya Rani, the assessee for assessment year 1961-62, failed to file her income‑tax return by the due date of 28 September 1961 and eventually filed it on 3 May 1962, after the Income Tax Act, 1961 had come into force on 1 April 1962. The Income Tax Officer imposed a penalty of Rs 4,060 under section …

SMT. SAROJ AGGARWALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,U.P.

1985 INSC 217Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Saroj Aggarwal, was the widow of a partner who died in 1959. After his death a new partnership deed was executed, admitting her and an adopted son as partners. The deceased had unabsorbed speculation losses from earlier years. In the assessment year 1962‑63, the appellant claimed to …

DR. K. GEORGE THOMASversusTHE C. I. T. KERALA, ERNAKULAM

1985 INSC 203Dismissed

K.G. Thomas, a journalist and propagator of Christian ideals, received large sums from the Indian Christian Crusade, U.S.A., which he claimed were personal gifts. The Income‑Tax Officer treated the amounts as remuneration for his vocation of preaching and publishing, and taxed them as business …

M/ S. BADRI PRASAD JAGAN PRASADversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW

1985 INSC 200Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, a Hindu undivided family (HUF) carrying on business, claimed relief under section 25(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 for the assessment year 1949-50, asserting that a partial partition of the HUF on 11 October 1948 and the formation of a partnership firm on 12 October 1948 constituted a …

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALOREversusSRI J.H. GOTLA, YADAGIRI

1985 INSC 187Dismissed

The assessee, an oil‑mill owner, gifted part of his machinery to his wife and three minor children and a firm was formed by his wife and another person. The firm leased the mill premises and machinery and the assessee rendered management services, receiving commission. The assessee had large losses …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PATLALAversusM/S. JAGANNATH PYARELAL

1985 INSC 190Appeal(s) allowed

The partnership firm M/s Jagannath Pyarelal, consisting of eleven partners, filed an application on 30 September 1959 for registration under section 26A of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922. The partnership deed had not been signed by one partner, Shri Rabinder Kumar, who had left India for studies, …

BHAGWAN DAS SITA RAMversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

1984 INSC 53Dismissed

A larger Hindu undivided family (HUF) was partitioned in 1945, after which a smaller HUF (the assessee) filed voluntary returns for assessment years 1946‑47 to 1949‑50. The Revenue sought to assess the assessee under Section 34 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922, invoking the second proviso to Section …

KALLOOMAL TAPESWARI PRASAD (HUF), KANPURversusTHE C. I T., KANPUR

1982 INSC 2Disposed off

The Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) Kalloomal Tapeshwari Prasad derived income from various sources and claimed that a partial oral partition in 1963 had divided eighteen immovable properties among ten coparceners, who then maintained separate accounts. The Income‑Tax Officer rejected the claim, …

KAPURCHAND SHRIMALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH,HYDERABAD

1981 INSC 153Appeal(s) allowed

The Hindu undivided family of Kapurchand Shrimal claimed that its joint family property had been partitioned, sending letters to the Income‑Tax Officer on 10 Oct 1960, 16 Jun 1961 and 11 Mar 1962. Despite these timely claims, assessment orders for the years 1955‑56 to 1958‑59 were completed without …

AHMED IBRAHIM SAHIGRA DHORAJIversusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, GUJARAT

1981 INSC 86Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, Ahmed Ibrahim Sahigra Dhoraji, possessed concealed income of Rs 7 lakhs earned between 1957‑58 and 1964‑65. He made a voluntary disclosure under Section 68 of the Finance Act 1965 and paid tax at the prescribed rate. He claimed that the tax paid could be deducted as a "debt owed" under …

HARCHARAN SINGHversusSHIV RANI AND ORS.

1981 INSC 43Dismissed

Harcharan Singh, a tenant of a shop in a U.P. cantonment, failed to pay rent for 1965‑66. The landlord sent a combined notice of arrears and eviction by registered post on 9 November 1966, which the tenant refused to accept on 10 November. The landlord sued for eviction under the U.P. Cantonment …

BHAGWAN DASS JAINversusUNION OF INDIA

1981 INSC 31Dismissed

Bhagwan Dass Jain, an assessee under the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, challenged the inclusion of a notional amount under section 23(2) for his self‑occupied house, arguing that no real income was derived and that the levy was in substance a tax on the building falling under Entry 49 of List II, which …

KISHINCHAND CHELLARAMversusTHE COMMR. OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY CITY II, BOMBAY

1980 INSC 182Appeal(s) allowed

The firm M/s Kishinchand Chellaram was reassessed for the year 1947-48 after the Income Tax Officer received information that Rs 1,07,350 had been telegraphed from its Madras office to Bombay in favour of a person named Nathirmal. The Officer repeatedly asked the assessee to explain the transaction …

L.B. SUGAR FACTORY & OIL MILLS (P) LTD. PILIBHITversusC.L.T. U.P., LUCKNOW

1980 INSC 163Appeal(s) allowed

L.B. Sugar Factory & Oil Mills Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, contributed Rs 22,332 to the construction of a dam and road at the request of the Collector and Rs 50,000 towards roads under a Sugarcane Development Scheme. Both amounts were claimed as deductions under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALAversusPIARA SINGH

1980 INSC 111Appeal(s) allowed

Piara Singh, a gold smuggler, was caught crossing the India‑Pakistan border in 1958 and Rs 65,500 in currency notes used to purchase gold abroad were confiscated by customs. He claimed that the confiscated amount was a loss incurred in his smuggling business and sought a deduction under section …

MAHALAXMI SUGAR MILLS CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI, NEW DELHI

1980 INSC 69Appeal(s) allowed

Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, claimed deductions for interest paid on arrears of sugarcane cess under the U.P. Sugarcane Cess Act, 1956, in its income‑tax returns for the assessment years 1959‑60, 1960‑61 and 1961‑62. The Income‑Tax Officer disallowed the claims, but the …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL-II, CALCUTTAversusKALYANJI MAVJI & COMPANY

1980 INSC 2Dismissed

Kalyanji Mavji & Co., a coal mining firm, owned several collieries, one of which (South Samia Colliery) was requisitioned by the military from 1942 to 1955. During the occupation the firm paid surface rent, royalty and watch‑ward salaries, which were allowed as business expenses. After the colliery …

C.I.T., MADRASversusK.S. RATHNASWAMY

1979 INSC 268Dismissed

The case concerned K.S. Rathnaswamy, a Ceylon citizen who owned a share in a joint family house in Tamil Nadu but spent most of his time in Ceylon. He filed income‑tax returns claiming resident status, while the Revenue argued he was a non‑resident because he neither maintained nor had a dwelling …

RAMESHWAR LAL SANWARMALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ASSAM

1979 INSC 261Dismissed

The Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) beneficially owned shares in a private limited company, though the shares were registered in the name of its Karta. The company advanced loans to three business concerns owned by the HUF, and the Income‑Tax Officer treated those loans as "deemed dividend" under …

ICE & GENERAL MILLSversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE II, MEERUT

1979 INSC 246Appeal(s) allowed

ICE & GENERAL MILLS, a potato manufacturing and cold‑storage firm, was assessed for the year 1961‑62. The Income‑Tax Officer, under section 34(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, initiated reassessment proceedings and in 1965 ordered tax on Rs 1,00,000 of alleged benami income, but the order was …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KERALA, ERNAKULAMversusV.DAMODARAN,TRIVANDRUM

1979 INSC 209Case Partly allowed

The Managing Director of R.K.V. Motors & Timber Ltd withdrew sums which the Income Tax Officer treated as dividend under section 2(6A)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1922. The dispute centered on whether "accumulated profits" for dividend liability includes the company's current year profits and whether …

NIRMAL TRADING COMPANYversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL (CALCUTTA)

1979 INSC 200Dismissed

Nirmal Trading Co., a dealer in paper products, incurred a loss of Rs.1,03,688 from a series of sale‑purchase transactions that were settled only by the exchange of delivery orders and cheque payments, with no evidence of actual delivery of goods. The Revenue argued that these were "speculative …

JUTE INVESTMENT CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL, CALCUTTA

1979 INSC 201Dismissed

Jute Investment Co. Ltd., a trader in gunny bags, entered into four purchase and four sale contracts with the same party, settling the transactions by transferring pucca delivery orders without any physical delivery of the bags, resulting in a loss of Rs. 2.25 lakh which it claimed as an ordinary …

RELIANCE JUTE & INDUSTRIES LTD.versusC.I.T., WEST BENGAL, CALCUTTA

1979 INSC 202Dismissed

Reliance Jute & Industries Ltd. claimed that an unabsorbed business loss of Rs 15,50,189 from the assessment year 1950‑51 could be carried forward and set off against its business income for the assessment year 1960‑61. The Income‑Tax Officer rejected the claim, citing the 1957 amendment to section …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALAversusALAGAPPA TEXTILE (COCHIN) LTD.

1979 INSC 189Dismissed

Alagappa Textile (Cochin) Ltd. entered into a five‑year financing and management agreement with Kamala Mills Ltd., under which Kamala Mills received remuneration for purchases, sales and management of the mill. The assessee claimed the remuneration as a deductible business expense under section …

BISWABANI(P.) LTD.versusSANTOSH KUMAR DUTIA AND ORS.

1979 INSC 183Appeal(s) allowed

Biswabani Pvt. Ltd. occupied Kalpana Theatre under a registered lease (1948‑53) and later under a consent decree that attempted to create a fresh five‑year lease starting March 1955. The fresh lease was not registered, rendering it void under the Transfer of Property Act. After the five‑year period …

C. I. T., WEST BENGAL III, CALCUTTAversusCAREW & CO. LTD.

1979 INSC 181Dismissed

Carew & Co. Ltd., an Indian resident company, earned income from business in India, a manufacturing business in Pakistan and incurred a loss from agricultural property in Pakistan for the assessment year 1956-57. The Income‑Tax Officer allowed a set‑off of the agricultural loss against the Pakistani …