Income Tax Rules, 1962

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Mumbai) appealed against the Bombay High Court's dismissal of its challenge to the applicability of Rule 8D, which provides a method for computing expenditure under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The issue was whether Rule 8D, introduced by the Income‑Tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 200…

Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd., a large consultancy firm, filed its 2000-01 return of income together with a tax audit report that clearly stated the provision for gratuity was not allowable under section 40A(7). However, the firm mistakenly claimed a deduction for that provision, resulting in an under‑assessment o…

The Supreme Court examined whether two US‑incorporated companies, eFunds Corp. and eFunds IT Solutions Inc., had a permanent establishment (PE) in India under the India‑US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Revenue argued that a fixed place of business, a service PE, and an agency PE existed through the In…

The Union of India challenged the constitutional validity of Section 115‑0 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which imposes an additional 10% tax on dividends declared by domestic companies. Tea companies argued that because up to 60% of their income is agricultural, the dividend is agricultural income and therefore only the…

SAP Labs India Private Limited and several other assessees challenged the Income Tax Officer's assessment on transfer pricing grounds, contending that the arm's length price (ALP) determined by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was not final and could be reviewed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. T…

The appeal concerned whether depreciation for computing book profit under Section 115J of the Income Tax Act should be allowed as per Rule 5 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, rather than Schedule XIV of the Companies Act, 1956. The assessee, a private limited company, had claimed depreciation under the Rules, but the Asse…

The Supreme Court examined whether interest expenditure incurred by Maxopp Investment Ltd. on shares held to acquire controlling interest, or held as stock‑in‑trade, could be deducted when the dividend income from those shares is exempt under Section 10. The Court held that the dominant‑purpose test is irrelevant; Sect…

The All India Bank Officers’ Confederation and other bank staff unions challenged Section 17(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 3(7)(i) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, alleging that they amounted to an excessive delegation of the essential legislative function to the Central Board of Direct Taxes and that the…

The case involved M/s Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., which operated captive power plants to supply electricity to its own industrial units at Rs 3.72 per unit while selling surplus power to the State Electricity Board at Rs 2.32 per unit. The assessing officer reduced the deduction claimed under Section 80‑IA, treating Rs …

The State Bank of India (SBI) paid Leave Travel Concession (LTC) to its employees for trips that included foreign legs and circuitous routes, and did not deduct tax at source (TDS). The Income Tax Department held SBI liable as an assessee in default under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act for failing to deduct TDS, a v…

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) entered into power purchase agreements (PPAs) with four wind‑energy companies, fixing a tariff of Rs 3.56 per kWh that was applicable only to projects availing accelerated depreciation under the Income‑Tax Act. The respondents later approached the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory …

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd (GUVNL) entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with EMCO Ltd for a 5 MW solar project, the tariff being fixed by the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC) in its first tariff order of 29 Jan 2010, which assumed the benefit of accelerated depreciation under Section 32 of th…