Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955

The respondents, officers of the Uttar Pradesh State Civil Service, claimed that the quinquennial cadre review of the IAS for Uttar Pradesh was due in April 2003 and that the review conducted in August 2005 should be given retrospective effect so that they could be considered for promotion. The Union of India and the C…

The appellant, a Tamil Nadu State Civil Service officer, challenged the promotion of the first respondent to the Indian Administrative Service, alleging that the State Government had illegally withheld the respondent’s Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for five years and had dropped disciplinary proceedings against hi…

The case concerned the selection of two vacancies in the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) for non‑State Civil Service officers in 2014. Baidyanath Yadav (appellant) was recommended by the Department of Agriculture and subsequently selected by the UPSC, while Aditya Narayan Roy (respondent No.1) challenged the proces…

P. Sivanandi, a Deputy Superintendent of Police recruited in 1985, was considered for promotion to the Indian Police Service in 1994‑95. His Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for 1992‑93 were initially missing but later found, and the ACR for the period 01‑Apr‑1993 to 15‑Jul‑1993 was written after the prescribed time …