Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The Supreme Court examined the seniority of several non‑State Civil Service officers appointed to the Indian Administrative Service by selection. The officers claimed earlier "year of allotment" based on their prior service, challenging the Government's reliance on the proviso to Rule 3(3)(c) of the …
The Union of India appealed against High Court orders that granted seniority benefits to several former State Civil Service officers who had been temporarily appointed as Collectors under Rule 9 of the IAS Cadre Rules, 1954. The respondents argued that their continuous officiation in a senior post …
The first respondent, H.R. Patankar, was recruited to the IAS in 1955 and assigned the year 1956 as his year of allotment. Several officers promoted from the Gujarat State Civil Service (respondents 3‑9) were also assigned the same year of allotment but began officiating in senior posts earlier than …
