Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
S.S. Uppal, a State civil servant, was selected for absorption into the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) against a non‑state quota. Although his name appeared in a panel for a vacancy that arose on 1‑Feb‑1989, he was actually appointed on 15‑Feb‑1989, after the seniority rules were amended on …
The Supreme Court examined the seniority of several non‑State Civil Service officers appointed to the Indian Administrative Service by selection. The officers claimed earlier "year of allotment" based on their prior service, challenging the Government's reliance on the proviso to Rule 3(3)(c) of the …
The petitioners, an association of Uttar Pradesh State Civil Service officers, challenged the First Amendment Rules (1989) to the IAS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, arguing that the proviso limiting Rule 3(3)(ii) to prospective operation denied them full weightage of seniority and violated …
