Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 2801–3000

EKRAMUDDIN KAZIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Ekramuddin Kazi, filed a writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 0483 of 2021 registered at Nayanagar Police Station under Sections 420, 468 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was the original complainant and a summary report had been filed, which the State's Additional …

MAHESH MANOHAR PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No.568/2010, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 353, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 85(1) & (2) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The incident occurred on 9 October 2010 when the …

ANIL VASVANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by three accused in a FIR alleging cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy arising from a commercial dispute over a 2014 Development Agreement. The applicants argued that …

NARENDRA AGARWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging cheating and related offences arising from a commercial dispute over a 2014 Development Agreement. The FIR, filed in November 2025, alleged that post‑dated …

RUFAS DAVID TUPDLversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Rufas David Tupdal, accused of rape, criminal intimidation and publishing an obscene video under Sections 376, 506 IPC and 67A IT Act, had been in jail for over three years. The prosecution alleged he forced sexual intercourse with a student, recorded it, and disseminated the video via a WhatsApp …

ANUPAM VIJAY PAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Anupam Vijay Pal Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (CR No. 557 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The …

ASHUTOSH KUMAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, Manoj Patel and Ashutosh Kumar, sought quashing of criminal proceedings filed under sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, invoking the inherent powers of the High Court …

PRASHANT HINDURAO PADALKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Shweta Dilip Bhosale and Prashant Hindurao Padalkar, filed writ petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIRs registered against them for offences under the IPC, arising from cross‑complaints of breach of trust and trespass. Both parties …

SHWETA DILIP BHOSALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Shweta Dilip Bhosale and Prashant Hindurao Padalkar, filed writ petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIRs registered against them for offences under the IPC, arising from cross‑complaints of breach of trust and trespass. Both parties …

RAMESH KONDIBA PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramesh Kondiba Patil, accused of offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 408 and 34 relating to alleged fraudulent sale of land parcels. The applicant owned the subject properties and, along with co‑accused, executed sale deeds to 29 investors …

SHADAB NAWAB ALI SHAIKH AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners were involved in an altercation on 15‑08‑2023 near Kala Ghoda, Mumbai, after a motorcycle handle brushed the complainant's hand, leading to a fight. An FIR was initially filed for simple hurt but was later upgraded to grievous hurt, charging offences under IPC sections 326, 504, 506 …

KULDEEP @ BHOLA MUKESH KAJANIYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Kuldeep @ Bhola Mukesh Kajaniya, was arrested in May 2023 in connection with FIR No.313 of 2023 for murder and related offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 302 and 307. The prosecution alleged that the accused formed an unlawful assembly and assaulted …

ALPESH SURESHCHANDRA KOTHARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Section 406 of the IPC for alleged criminal breach of trust involving pledged gold. The complainant claimed she pledged 23‑carat gold for a loan of Rs.9,00,000, which …

BALDEV SINGH VIJANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner sought recall of a 2 April 2024 order that quashed an FIR dated 6 December 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a property transaction. The FIR was filed by the complainant after a failed sale of a bungalow, …

MUKUND CHANDRAM BHAMBARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Mukund Chandram Bhambar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 and 34, and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The applicant …

GANESH SAHEBRAO RAHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ganesh Sahebrao Rahate, was charged with murder and related offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of a man on 21 December 2023. The prosecution relied on CCTV footage showing the applicant and co‑accused entering the victim’s house, carrying …

SUNIL KUMAR GARGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Garg, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking to quash an order dated 28‑04‑2025 of the Special Court at Greater Sessions, Mumbai, which had taken cognizance of a …

SURESH UTTAM KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Suresh Uttam Kale, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for alleged offences under IPC Section 395 and Indian Railways Act Section 174 relating to a robbery in 2018. He was arrested in 2025 based primarily on confessional statements of four …

SHUBHAM BALASAHEB TAKALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered the bail application of Shubham Balasaheb Takale, a 25‑year‑old accused charged with multiple offences under the IPC, who had been in custody for five years and three months with only three of thirty‑five witnesses examined. The Court examined the constitutional …

AMIT AJIT AGARWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Amit Ajit Agarwal, was charged in C.R. No.67 of 2026 with offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 318(3), 336(1), 338, 339, 340(1)(2)) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (sections 329(1)(3)(4), 61(A), (B), (35)) relating to cheating, fabrication and wrongful confinement. The …

ZULFEEQUAR DAULAT KHAN SARGUROH AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants were charged under IPC sections 406, 420 read with 34 for a commercial mineral supply dispute. The parties later reconciled, returned the disputed amount and filed consent terms seeking to quash the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC and the corresponding Section 528 of the Bharatiya …

NILESH DINKAR DHOKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellant, Nilesh Dinkar Dhoke, was convicted under Sections 302, 427 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence and release on bail, relying on earlier bail orders granted to his co‑accused, Pallavi Nilesh Dhoke and …

Deepak Balakrishna SalveversusThe state of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicants, Deepak Salve and others, were charged in a special case for allegedly assaulting a minor and using obscene language, based on the testimony of the minor and the first informant. The prosecution alleged that a co-accused slapped the minor and that the applicants attempted to assault …

C.B.I. ACB, MUMBAIversusVIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The applicant sought condonation of a 179‑day delay in filing an application for leave to appeal against an acquittal dated 31 August 2017, which involved charges under Sections 120‑B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Respondent …

M/S D. C. AMBER DEVELOPERS LLP AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a developer, were charged under IPC sections 409, 420, 464 and 34 following a complaint by a society member regarding a redevelopment project. The parties later settled their private dispute and filed a consent petition under Sections 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 528 of …

AZGAR TAIYEBALLY DALAL AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, accused in a redevelopment dispute, sought quashing of FIR No. 1036/2024 and a chargesheet under IPC sections 409, 420, 464 and 34, invoking consent settlement dated 07.05.2026. The parties had resolved their differences through a consent affidavit filed on 29.08.2026, and the High …

POONAM VIJAY MATTE AND ANRversusRAM RAMDAS SAMUDRE AND ANR

Disposed Off

Petitioners Poonam Vijay Matte et al. and Ram Ramdas Samudre filed writ petitions under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR/MECR proceedings relating to alleged extortion, forgery and criminal intimidation. The parties had settled their private dispute, …

ASIF ALI AHMED ALI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petition arose from a civil land dispute that was settled by the parties, who filed an affidavit of consent and executed release and conveyance deeds. The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 83 of 2023 (sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC) under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and …

ANIL KUMAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No.44/2010 and the accompanying charge‑sheet for offences under the IPC and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The parties had settled the underlying …

M/S WALIA AGNI METAL PVT. LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, M/s Walia Agni Metal Pvt. Ltd., was implicated in FIR No.44 of 2021 for cheating and breach of trust concerning a land transaction. The parties later settled the dispute through a deed of compromise filed in a commercial suit, and the petitioner sought quashing of the FIR under …

BHARATH PRAVEEN CHAND DARAM @ BHARAT RAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 0194/2024 filed for offences under Sections 420 read with 34 of the IPC. The parties had settled the underlying civil dispute, with the complainant receiving Rs.3,61,000, and both sought …

VIPIN SATYAWAN KHANDAGALE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Mathadi workers involved in a violent dispute over loading and unloading contracts, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 and 324. Both parties filed cross‑FIRs but later sought to settle the matter and filed consent affidavits requesting quashing of the FIRs under …

SUNNY KARMVEER DHILOD AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Mathadi workers involved in a violent dispute over loading and unloading contracts, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 and 324. Both parties filed cross‑FIRs but later sought to settle the matter and filed consent affidavits requesting quashing of the FIRs under …

VINAYAK GANESH KAPADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

Vinayak Ganesh Kapade appealed against the Special Court's refusal to grant bail in a murder and related offences case (Crime No.171 of 2023). The appellant, charged under multiple provisions of the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act, SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Maharashtra …

SURYAKANT @ PANDIT DASHRATH KAMBLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The appellant, Suryakant @ Pandit Dashrath Kamble, was convicted in a murder case (Crime No.171 of 2023) involving multiple offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and MCOC Act. He sought bail, which the Special Court had denied. The appellant …

DEEPAK SATYAWAN KUDALKAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants were charged with cheating and criminal breach of trust for taking deposits from 27 investors, all of which were later returned. The complainants filed affidavits confirming full settlement and requested that the criminal proceedings be terminated. The applicants filed an application …

VINOD KUMAR NIHALCHAND PARMAR AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR C.R. No.4 of 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant had paid the disputed dues and filed a …

RAMESH PARASHRAM GAWANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine, applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. The prosecution's case relied primarily on the testimony of a child eyewitness who claimed the appellant assaulted her mother with …

BHARATI ANKUSH SANEKAR AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicants, Bharati Ankush Sanekar and another, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cheating case (Crime No. 81 of 2025) filed under IPC Section 420 read with Section 34. The FIR, based on a complaint by Sharvari Vijaykumar Raut, alleged that the applicants received large sums for a …

RUPA GOVIND NEPALI AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The police raided a brothel in Pune on 12‑12‑2003 and found minor girls in the presence of the accused women, Rupa Govind Nepali and Rita Jithbahadu Thapa. The prosecution proved that the accused had obtained possession of the minors with intent to use them for prostitution, relying on police …

PARVATI MARUTI PATIL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Parvati Maruti Patil, a 75‑year‑old senior citizen, and her daughter‑in‑law sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No.132 of 2022, which alleged offences under IPC sections 504 and 506 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail on the …

VIKAS RANCHOD SHUKLA AND ORSversusMANISHA EKNATH KAVALE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a practising advocate, a tax consultant and his brother, were accused by a tribal lady in a criminal complaint (CR No.440 of 2022) and in turn filed a cross‑complaint (CR No.441 of 2022) against three other individuals alleging assault and robbery, arising from a rivalry over …

PANDURANG ARJUN VIGHNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Pandurang Arjun Vighne, accused No.3 in a murder case involving offences under Sections 302, 201, 364, 324 read with 34 of the IPC. The prosecution’s case was based solely on weak circumstantial evidence and a four‑day‑old last‑seen theory, with a …

AMAN MUSTAK SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Accused No.3 in a case involving murder, attempted murder, criminal conspiracy and other offences. The applicant was indicted primarily on …

ANIL ATMARAM BHAMBORE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petition arose from a civil dispute over a Memorandum of Understanding concerning possession of flats, where the developer failed to deliver possession and the aggrieved party filed FIR No.196 of 2018 for trespass and mischief. The petitioners sought quashing of the FIR by consent under Section …

UMESH RAMCHANDRA GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Umesh Ramchandra Gaikwad, convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 1,090‑day delay in filing his appeal. The delay was attributed to his incarceration from 15 October 2022, which allegedly impeded his ability to obtain …

KIRAN PURSHOTTAMDAS GORADIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Sections 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No.0321/2023 (IPC §§419, 420) that arose from a tenancy dispute. Both parties had settled the civil dispute and agreed to a consent quashing. The court examined its …

JAYESH RAMESHCHANDRA SAVLAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioner, Jayesh Rameshchandra Savla, filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking consent quashing of FIR No. 0320 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406 and 420 arising from a tenancy dispute. The High Court examined the applicability of Section 528 (mirroring …

V. MURUGANANTHAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, V. Muruganantham, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in a case (Crime No. 1258 of 2025) registered for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 409. The FIR …

RAHUL DINKAR PATIL AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a practising advocate, a tax consultant and his brother, were accused by a tribal lady in a criminal complaint (CR No.440 of 2022) and in turn filed a cross‑complaint (CR No.441 of 2022) against three other individuals alleging assault and robbery, arising from a rivalry over …

JYOTSNABEN D/O KANTILAL PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Jyotsnaben, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the transfer of investigation of CR No.355 of 2024 (charges under Sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC) from the Azad Maidan Police Station to the CBI or State Investigation Department. The police had filed a B‑Summary Report …

MAUSIN SULEMAN SHIVANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Mausin S. Shivani, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 397, 452 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He filed a criminal appeal (No. 892 of 1998) challenging the conviction. During the pendency …

DR. DINESH RAMESH CHAVAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, husband and in‑laws, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashal of criminal proceedings initiated on an FIR relating to offences under Sections 323, 406, 498A, 504, 506, 507 and 34 of the IPC. The …

ABDUL SHAKUR WALESAB NADAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing his wife, resulting in her death. The prosecution relied on the testimony of a child eyewitness, multiple oral dying declarations, an extra‑judicial confession, and forensic evidence showing the appellant's blood on the seized …

ANIL RATAN KACHRAVATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Anil Ratan Kachravat, was arrested on 25‑12‑2020 for a double murder alleged to have occurred behind Jay Malhar Hotel, where he allegedly killed Salim Shaikh and later the injured Tausif Shaikh using an iron clamp. The case, registered as C.R. No.727/2020, charges him under IPC s.302, …

PRIYESH BHEDAversusVIJAYA NADAR AND ANR

Dismissed

The applicant, Priyesh Bheda, filed an application seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. The court noted that the applicant failed to appear on six scheduled dates, indicating a lack of seriousness, and dismissed the application …

SUHAS KASTURCHAND SHAH AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, who are the factory occupier, production supervisor and safety engineer, were charged in FIR No. 0444/2022 for the death of a worker and injuries to two others arising from a factory accident. The factory owner had already paid medical expenses and ex gratia to the victims' families, …

JAVED AHMAD @ JAHIR AHMAD ANSARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Javed Ahmad, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he sold prohibited Gutkha from his shop, leading to the seizure of 188 pouches and charges under Sections 26(2)(i), 26(3) and 26(4) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Section 123 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He …

SURENDRA UGAMARAJ SANCHETI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, step‑father, his sister and nephew, were charged under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC for abetment of suicide of their step‑son Parth Sancheti. They sought discharge under Section 227 CrPC, arguing lack of proximate cause, absence of any instigation, and that the suicide note …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusNITIN SACHCHIDANAND MIRWANKAR

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra sought leave to appeal a judgment that acquitted Mr. Nitin Mirwankar of an offence under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint alleged that the accused, along with others, verbally abused the complainant in her flat, a dispute rooted in a pending civil …

RAMDEO PARMAL THAKUR and ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ANR

Disposed Off

The appellants, Ramdeo Parmal Thakur and Sudarshan Prasad Shankar Thakur, appealed against a conviction under Section 304(2) of the Indian Penal Code and a three‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay. The appeal was filed under Criminal Appeal …

CARSON PERCY VALLADARESversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA REPRESENTER AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petition under Article 227 challenged the order of the Maintenance Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal which directed the petitioner, Carson Percy Valladares, to vacate the family house on the ground that his abusive behaviour threatened the life and dignity of his elderly father, a senior …

ASMITA SUNIL PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Ms. Asmita Sunil Patil under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, relating to offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 466 of the IPC, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, and the Banning of …

SANTOSH VITHAL PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Santosh Vitthal Pawar was convicted under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code for the dowry death of his wife Savita and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. He filed an appeal and a second interim application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending the appeal. …

HARIT ABHAY MEHTA AND ANRversusCENTRAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, Harit Abhay Mehta and Abhay Yashwantlal Mehta, were convicted in CBI Special Case No. 35 of 2012 for offences under Sections 120‑B, 420, 467, 471 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving five‑year rigorous imprisonment terms and hefty fines of Rs. 3.50 crore and Rs. 1 crore …

SANDEEP SHIVAJI BHONDVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Sandeep Bhondve, was charged with abetment of suicide (IPC s.306 r/w s.107) and offences under s.504 and s.506 IPC for allegedly cheating a relative of Rs.59 lakh in a land transaction, issuing dishonoured cheques and threatening the deceased with death. The deceased later committed …

CHANDRAKANT MAHADEV MANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Chandrakent Mahadev Mane was convicted under Section 489-C of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment, with the sentence suspended pending appeal. He had already served one year, two months and 18 days as an under‑trial prisoner. The appellant sought suspension of the …

SAGAR D SAWANT AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR dated 02.02.2018 filed by a suspended police constable (the complainant) alleging theft of jewellery and other offences under IPC sections 454, 380 r/w 34. The petitioners contended that no rent or licence agreement existed and that the complainant had …

PREYASH SHASHIKANT NANAVATIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Preyash Shashikant Nanavati, was named Accused No.12 in an FIR filed in 2024 alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to a dispute over a parcel of land in Mira‑Bhayander. The petitioner claimed ownership of the land based on a registered conveyance …

MOHAMMED KAUSAR ABDUL KALAM SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Rejected

The appellant, convicted under Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act and several IPC provisions for aggravated sexual assault of a minor, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his 20-year rigorous imprisonment sentence and bail pending appeal. He argued that contradictions in the victim's …

YOGESH POPAT NAVALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Yogesh Popat Navale, an accountant, was arrested for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust involving the siphoning of approximately Rs. 8.63 crore from Jenesis Event Management Company over nine years. The prosecution presented evidence of systematic diversion of funds, …

VISHAL ANANT MUNDKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, a practising advocate, was charged with conspiracy to reuse cancelled stamp papers, forge challans and obtain an heirship certificate, facing multiple IPC offences. The prosecution alleged that he accepted court‑fee payments and was involved in the scheme, but the FIR and recorded …

AMOL SHANKAR PADALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Amol Shankar Padale was arrested in October 2018 for a violent skirmish that escalated into a murder, for which he is charged under Sections 302, 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323 and 504 of the IPC and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. He has been in custody for 7 years and 10 months, with 17 …

NAMDEV DAGADU BHAGAT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellants, originally convicted of offences under Sections 120(B), 143, 147, 148, 302 read with 149 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, applied for bail pending their appeal filed in 2019, arguing that they have already served more than 14 years in prison. The State opposed bail, …

VICKY GOPAL THAPA @ SAGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The applicant, convicted under IPC Section 376(i) and POCSO Sections 4, 6, 8 and 12 for sexual assault of a four‑year‑old girl, sought bail pending his appeal against a life‑imprisonment sentence. The victim testified that the applicant inserted his finger into her private parts, and her mother …

VEDPRAKASH P PANDEYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Vedprakash P. Pandey, challenged a Metropolitan Magistrate's order that denied his discharge under Section 239 of the CrPC in a case alleging cheating under Sections 416 and 419 of the IPC. The dispute centered on whether Respondent No.3, Jay Prakash P. Mishra, was the Secretary of …

AMIT MADHUKAR BHOGLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The applicant, Amit Madhukar Bhogle, sought bail in a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court. The Court examined his extensive criminal record, which includes multiple cases involving serious offences such as murder, attempt to murder, and violations of the Arms Act, many of which resulted in …

VISHWANATH DEVARAJA RAOversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered the bail application of Vishwanath Devaraja Rao, a 67‑year‑old senior vice‑president of Reliance Communications, who was arrested in connection with a large banking fraud alleged to have occurred between 2013 and 2017. The charges under Section 120‑B read with Sections 406, …

PRAVIN SHRINIVAS MAHAJANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Pravin Shrinivas Mahajan was arrested on 5 May 2021 for murder under Section 302 IPC and has been in custody for over five years. He filed an application for enlargement of bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arguing that the prolonged pre‑trial detention violates …

MACHINDRA UTTAM KOLHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dismissed

The appellant, son of the deceased, appealed an acquittal of two relatives who were charged under Section 304 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the death of Uttam Kolhe. The trial court had found no intention or knowledge to cause death and held that the death resulted from a natural …

KISAN NAGNATH PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court of Bombay considered a bail application filed by Kisan Nagnath Pawar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a police case (CR No. 839 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 302, 307, 323, 324 and 34. The applicant sought release …

ADITYA RAVI BHUJBALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by 22‑year‑old Aditya Ravi Bhujbal, the principal accused in a violent incident involving a scythe that resulted in the victim’s death. The charges include IPC sections 307, 504, 506, 34 (later upgraded to 302), sections 4 and 25 of the Arms …

SAURBH DADYA DNYANESHWAR GOLESARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Saurbh Dadya Dnyaneshwar Golesar, was charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a woman on 8 August 2021. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was present outside the victim's house while a co‑accused committed the murder. The …

VISHAL TEJHBAHADUR YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered two bail applications filed by Vishal Jadhav and Durgesh Sarwjeet Singh, accused of operating an illegal call centre that allegedly defrauded Canadian nationals. The prosecution charged them under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of …

GOVIND SHANKAR GHORPADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, convicted of murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302 and 307 of the IPC, applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. He contended that key eyewitnesses were interested parties and that the evidence contained contradictions, also urging release after six …

DURGESH SARWJET SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered two bail applications filed by Vishal Yadav and Durgesh Singh, accused of operating an illegal call centre that allegedly defrauded Canadian nationals. They were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the …

DILIP RAMESH NIHALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for bail to Dilip Ramesh Nihal, who is charged with offences under Sections 304, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant suffers a serious leg injury requiring multiple orthopedic surgeries, as …

SANTOSH PANDURANG RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Santosh Pandurang Rathod and Ravikant Pandurang Rathod, accused under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34 for alleged fraud in a land sale. The complaints were filed by two complainants who claimed misrepresentation and breach of promise in a …

SANTOSH PANDURANG RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Santosh Pandurang Rathod and Ravikant Pandurang Rathod, accused under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34 for alleged fraud in a land sale. The complaints were filed by two complainants who claimed misrepresentation and breach of promise in a …

DNYANESHWAR TRINBAK YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Dnyaneshwar Trimbak Yadav (Accused No.2) in a case alleging cheating of Rs.52 lakh from seven depositors, with charges under IPC Sections 406, 420 and 34. The applicant …

USHIK MAHESH GALAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR

Disposed Off

Ushik Mahesh Gala, accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was arrested in 2025 and subsequently granted interim medical bail for gall‑bladder surgery. After undergoing additional hernia surgery in July 2026, he applied for an enlargement of medical bail, citing morbid obesity …

SANMYAK POPAT KHANDAGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for an accused charged with offences under Sections 64(2)(m) and 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual …

ABDUL REHMAN ABDUL GAFOOR SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Abdul Rehman Abdul Gafoor Shaikh appealed a conviction under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act and the Indian Penal Code. He was released on bail in 2007 with his sentence suspended, and the court had directed that he could not leave Mumbai without prior written permission from the …

UMESH VISHNU JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, convicted under IPC sections 307, 377, 506 and several provisions of the POCSO Act, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 332‑day delay in preferring his criminal appeal. He argued that financial hardship and his prolonged incarceration prevented him from engaging …

ATUL RATNAKAR MAHASHADBE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC (and Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) in a case where they were accused of cheating, fraud, and related offences for allegedly taking Rs.1.8 crore from a complainant for a flat that was already sold to a …

PRAKASH RAMESHCHANDRA JAINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, partners of Spire Associates, were charged under multiple IPC sections for allegedly cheating a buyer of Rs.1.80 crore by selling a flat that had already been transferred to a third party. The prosecution presented a memorandum of understanding dated 29 December 2023 showing receipt …

RAVIKANT PANDURANG RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Santosh Pandurang Rathod and Ravikant Pandurang Rathod, accused under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34 for alleged fraud in a land sale. The complaints were filed by two complainants who claimed misrepresentation and breach of promise in a …

VIKRAM KANTILAL AAZAD ( VIKRAMBHAI KANTILAL PARMAR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The original complainant appealed under Section 14‑A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act to cancel the regular bail granted to the accused, alleging breach of bail conditions that required the accused to mark his presence at the police station on alternate Mondays and refrain from entering …

WASIM SALIM PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Wasim Salim Patel, challenged a detention order issued under section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, alleging that the detaining authority relied on stale past offences and failed to disclose material supporting its subjective satisfaction that …

RONAK RAMKISAN GOKHLANI @ ROUNAK JAIKISHIN GOKLANEYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash an order dated 8 December 2017 passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Pune, which had permitted the Judicial Magistrate First Class Court No.9, Pune to frame charges under Sections 447 …

SADDAM IRFAN ANSARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioner, Saddam Irfan Ansari, challenged a detention order dated 24 December 2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The order relied on the authority’s subjective satisfaction that the petitioner was a “dangerous …

VIJAY RAMESH DANTANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Partly Allowed

The appellant, Vijay Ramesh Dantani, was convicted by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act for penetrative sexual assault of an 11‑year‑old girl, receiving life imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the High Court examined the credibility of the child’s testimony, the four‑day delay in filing the FIR, …

BALIRAM DHARMA SALPI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants sought quashing of a criminal case (C.R. No.168 of 2012) filed under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120B and 34 IPC alleging forgery of documents to obtain land. During the pendency of the trial, the parties reconciled; the applicants returned possession of the land to the complainant …

VARDA KAMLAKAR BADBADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, accused No.2 in a criminal case involving fraud and money‑lending offences, sought discharge after the Sessions Court rejected her application. The prosecution relied mainly on statements of about one hundred investors who claimed the petitioner was present at her estranged husband’s …

UNITED PHOSPHORUS LIMITEDversusRAMOJI RAO AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sneha Nitin Chavan, the original complainant in a criminal case under Sections 499, 500, 501, 502 and 34 of the IPC, filed a leave‑to‑appeal application 90 days after the order of acquittal. The respondents argued that the delay was not properly explained. The court examined the …

RIYAZ VALI MOHAMMED SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an interim bail application filed by Riyas Vali Mohammed Shaikh, who was convicted under Section 120B(1) IPC and Sections 3(1)(I) and 3(2) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act for a 2011 shooting incident that resulted in two deaths. He was sentenced to life …

AMOL PANDURANG SAWANTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Amol Pandurang Sawant challenged a detention order issued by the Thane Commissioner of Police under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The order relied on a preamble describing his past criminal conduct and on specific recent offences and in‑camera statements. The …

GANDHI AUTOMATIONS PVT. LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Gandhi Automation Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the registration of a criminal case (Cr.No.202 of 2019) under Sections 408, 420, 204 of the IPC and Sections 66 and 43 of the IT Act. The police had completed investigation and filed a charge‑sheet before the Judicial …

UNION OF INDIAversusMADAN MOHAN BANERJEE AND ORS.

Dismissed

The CBI filed an application seeking leave to appeal the acquittal of three accused (an Assistant Estate Manager and two private individuals) by a Special Judge who found them not guilty of conspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of trust and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The …

SUBHASH MESU SANSARE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC for offences alleged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act, arising from a land‑worship programme where they were accused of assault and intimidation. A Single Judge had earlier granted interim bail with conditions, …

AJIT ASHOK MANE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants and the complainant, involved in a private dispute over alleged fabrication and forgery of receipts for undelivered goods, reconciled and executed consent terms that were treated as undertakings to the court. The complainant had filed a criminal complaint (C.R. No. 47/2026) alleging …

SAMEER RAMCHANDRA KHARKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sameer Ramchandra Kharkar, was convicted in 2017 for murder and house‑trespass (IPC §§302, 452) arising from a knife‑attack on 23 April 2015. He contended that there were no eye‑witnesses, that he had exercised his right under Section 106, and that the incident amounted to culpable …

KISHOR DNYANOBA GAIKWADversusADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Kishor Dnyanoba Gaikwad, challenged an order by the Additional Collector that set aside a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate’s rejection of his parents' application under Section 5 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 seeking eviction of the petitioner from …

HIRAMAN MESU SANSAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC for offences alleged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act, arising from a land‑worship programme where they were accused of assault and intimidation. A Single Judge had earlier granted interim bail with conditions, …

PARESH ANILKUMAR BHANDARI AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, owners of a flat, were accused of cheating a buyer by selling a property that was already encumbered, leading to FIRs under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The first applicant, …

RAJKUMAR MAHAVIRPRASAD JOSHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for offences alleged under IPC sections 409, 420 and 120(B) relating to a commercial fraud involving grey cloth. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined the …

PRAFUL PRATAPRAI TRIVEDIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Praful Prataprai Trivedi, was convicted under IPC Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5,000, which was later confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. He filed a criminal revision seeking relief, but his wife submitted …

TRIBHUVANDAS M. RUGHANI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

A fire caused by a short circuit in a residential building on 06.11.2021 resulted in two deaths. The State of Maharashtra filed FIR No. 928/2021 against the architect, the building's society secretary and chairman, and the developers under IPC sections 336, 338, 304(2), 34 and the Maharashtra Fire …

JAYESH HIRALAL SHAH (CHAIRMAN) AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

A fire caused by a short circuit in a residential building on 06.11.2021 resulted in two deaths. The State of Maharashtra filed FIR No. 928/2021 against the architect, the building's society secretary and chairman, and the developers under IPC sections 336, 338, 304(2), 34 and the Maharashtra Fire …

DINESH SURESH DABHADE @ DABDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Dinesh Suresh Dabhade, who has been in custody for 7 years, 6 months and 22 days for an alleged murder (IPC Section 302). The State opposed bail citing the gravity of the offence …

BABITA NARAINDAS GANDHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

A fire caused by a short circuit in a residential building on 06.11.2021 resulted in two deaths. The State of Maharashtra filed FIR No. 928/2021 against the architect, the building's society secretary and chairman, and the developers under IPC sections 336, 338, 304(2), 34 and the Maharashtra Fire …

JUNAID NOOR ALI SAYYED @ PAPAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Junaid Noor Ali Sayyed, sought bail in a criminal case (CR No.613 of 2024) for alleged robbery and offences under the Indian Railways Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant snatched a mobile phone from a victim on a local train, causing the victim to jump and sustain grievous …

SANJAY BHAILAL SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

A fire caused by a short circuit in a residential building on 06.11.2021 resulted in two deaths. The State of Maharashtra filed FIR No. 928/2021 against the architect, the building's society secretary and chairman, and the developers under IPC sections 336, 338, 304(2), 34 and the Maharashtra Fire …

NILAMKUMAR POPATLAL BHANDARI AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, who were the original accused in FIR No.165/2024 alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 420 r/w 34 and the Maharashtra Depositors Act, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash …

ROHIT DILIP LOKHANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Rohit Dilip Lokhande applied for bail in a case registered under IPC Section 376(1)(3) and POCSO Sections 4 and 6, alleging forced sexual intercourse with a 15‑year‑old girl who later became pregnant. The prosecution relied on a psychologist’s report stating the victim was repeatedly forced, while …

MOHD. IQBAL IBRAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellant, Mohd Iqbal Ibrahim Khan, was arrested in September 2022 and charged under several IPC provisions and Section 13(1)(b) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for alleged involvement with the Popular Front of India (PFI). The Special Judge denied bail, invoking Section 43D …

MOHD. IQBAL IBRAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Mohd Iqbal Ibrahim Khan, was arrested in September 2022 and charged under the UAPA and several IPC provisions for alleged involvement with the Popular Front of India (PFI). He sought bail pending trial, arguing that the evidence—primarily statements and videos—did not establish any …

MOHAMMED ARIF @ RANU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, accused in FIR No. 0531/2023 for offences under IPC sections 326, 324, 504, 506 and 34, sought quashal of the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC, claiming they were the victims of a brawl that originated from a money‑transaction dispute at a police station. After the dispute was …

PRADIP BALRAM GARAIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Pradip Balram Garai, was the sole accused in a murder case under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of Sushant Karmakar, the first husband of his second wife, Tanushri Chand. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on CCTV footage showing an unidentified person …

SUMIT SUNIL JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sumit Sunil Jadhav, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 of the IPC and Sections 184 and 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act, receiving six months’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000. He filed an interim application seeking suspension …

AAKASH MADHUKAR KURNEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The appellant, Aakash Madhukar Kurnekar, was convicted by a Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 307 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving seven years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence and enlargement on bail pending the …

DALICHAND G. SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Dalichand G. Shah, a consultant, was charged under IPC sections 420, 120B and later 465, 468 in FIR No. 258 of 2015 for alleged bogus vouchers and bills related to a de‑silting contract with the Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC). He was blacklisted from 2016 to 2021 and sought to quash the FIR, …

RAHUL KADIDAS PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rahul Kadidas Prajapati applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11191048260598) alleging offences under Sections 108 and 54 of the BNSS (corresponding to Sections 306 and 114 of the IPC). The applicant …

ANUP VIKALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE INDUSTRIES AND ORS

Disposed Off

The High Court examined whether a communication from the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) stating that a complaint did not involve sexual harassment constitutes a "recommendation" under Section 13(2) of the POSH Act, thereby making an appeal under Section 18 maintainable. The Industrial Court had …

CHANDRANI SENversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE INDUSTRIES AND ORS

Disposed Off

The High Court examined whether a communication from the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) stating that a complaint did not involve sexual harassment constitutes a "recommendation" under Section 13(2) of the POSH Act, thereby making an appeal under Section 18 maintainable. The Industrial Court had …

Mr Rohit AnandversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The High Court examined whether a communication from the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) stating that a complaint did not involve sexual harassment constitutes a "recommendation" under Section 13(2) of the POSH Act, thereby making an appeal under Section 18 maintainable. The Industrial Court had …

ANIL MANOHAR TAMBUTKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Anil Manohar Tambutkar, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, with the incident occurring on 1 November 2022. He had been incarcerated for three years and nine months before the charge was framed, and the prosecution intended to examine 47 …

VIKAS DEEPAK SINGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Vikas Deepak Singh was charged with murder, voluntarily causing hurt and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 302, 323 and 504 for allegedly stabbing his co‑worker Raju Patil during a workplace altercation. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony that the two had a history of fights and …

AMAR ASHOK KARANDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Rejected

The appellant challenged the Special Court's order granting regular bail to respondents Nos.2 and 3 under Section 14-A of the SC & ST Act. The respondents had not been arrested during investigation, and the charge‑sheet had already been filed when they applied for bail. The appellant argued that …

AMAR ASHOK KARANDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Rejected

The appellant challenged a Special Court order granting regular bail to respondents Nos.2‑7 under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The respondents had not been arrested during investigation, and the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The appellant argued …

CHASMU ALIAS SADRE ALAM MOHAMMAD UMAR KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Chasmu alias Sadre Alam Mohammad, the sole accused in a case under Section 376(2)(i)(j) of the IPC and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, had been in custody for more than nine years. He applied for bail while the trial was at the stage of recording his statement under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. …

SUNIL MISHRA AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of FIR No. 367 of 2023, which alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and conspiracy against the directors of RKCL. The dispute arose from …

MANOHAR MAHADEO HAJAREversusMANGAL PRABHAT GUMANMAL LODHA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, partners of an unregistered partnership firm, alleged that three other partners colluded with Respondent No.1 to execute a Development Agreement in 2003, thereby cheating them out of their share in several land plots. They claimed fraud under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal …

DEVYA @ DEVENDRA DILIP BHUSANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The applicant, Arjun Vitthal Kudhekar, challenged the one‑year externment order passed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer and confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The externment was based on a series of criminal cases filed against him between 2016 and …

VINODKUMAR GANPATLAL AJNERIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Vinodkumar Ganpatlal Ajneria was charged with offences under the IPC, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the POCSO Act for allegedly inducing a 14‑year‑old girl into prostitution. He was arrested along with co‑accused after a police raid. The applicant’s earlier bail application had been …

AKRAM ASLAM KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Akram Aslam Khan, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking release in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 393 and 34 and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. Although the prosecution alleged him to be a gang leader, the …

SACHIN PRAKASHRAO ANDUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, convicted of murder under Section 302 r/w 34 of the IPC and Section 3(25) of the Arms Act, sought bail pending his appeal. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses and an extra‑judicial confession, while the defence argued that the identification was delayed, the confession was …

SUMIT SUJON CHAUDRIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, accused No.2 in FIR CR No. 0005/2023, sought quashing of the FIR and chargesheet filed under Sections 465, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the IPC for alleged forgery of rent receipts and illegal transfer of an electricity meter. The original complainant (respondent No.2) filed …

DR. (MRS.) RASHMI SANGHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Dr. Rashmi Sanghi and Dr. Gopal Kabra seeking quashing of defamation complaints (Criminal Complaint Nos. 521/SS/2015 and 522/SS/2015) filed by the Crop Care Federation of India Limited. The complaints alleged …

DR SHRI GOPAL KABRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Dr. Rashmi Sanghi and Dr. Gopal Kabra seeking quash of defamation complaints (Section 500 IPC) filed by the Crop Care Federation of India Limited. The complaints arose from statements made by the doctors on a …

YOGESH SHARAD KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita) filed by Yogesh Sharad Kadam, the managing director of Season Worlds, who was charged with cheating offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read …

ARTIJ W/O VINAYAK GUPTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita) filed by Yogesh Sharad Kadam, the managing director of Season Worlds, who was charged with cheating offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read …

ABDULKARIM @ KARIMKHAN HAYAJI SAIYEDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The applicant, a 76‑year‑old man suffering from serious cardiac ailments, filed an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail after a chargesheet was filed for murder (IPC 302), attempt to murder (IPC 114) and a provision of the Gujarat Police …

MOHAMMAD RAFIK LALMOHAMMAD BARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mohammad Rafik Lalmohammad Bara, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several IPC sections including cheating, criminal breach of …

IMTIYAZ S/O IMAMUDDIN SIRAZUDDIN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail before the filing of a chargesheet under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 109(1) and 118(1) of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no prior record, …

SHASHIKANT BALKRUSHNA KSHIRSAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Shashikant Balkrushna Kshirsagar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in connection with a fraud case (CR No.153 of 2025) involving alleged cheating of 41 investors amounting to …

DHANESH MARUTI THORATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dhanesh Maruti Thorat in a special MCOC case involving charges of murder, kidnapping, conspiracy, and violations of the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. The prosecution alleged that Thorat harboured the gang members …

RAMAKANT RAMPRAVESH RAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, a student, was arrested as Accused No.4 in a case involving the preparation of false surety documents to secure his father's release. The prosecution alleged his participation in forgery and conspiracy alongside co‑accused Haribhau and Sunil Kambale, who prepared forged Aadhar and …

FARNAAZ NASIR PIPULKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Mrs. Farnaaz Nasir Pipulkar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 102/2023 registered for alleged cheating under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleges that she, along with co‑accused, induced a complainant to …

SAMEER PANDURANG BANKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Sameer Pandurang Bankar, accused of misappropriating Rs.2,67,808 under Section 409 of the IPC while serving as a postmaster. The alleged offences occurred between …

BALKRISHNA DNYANOBA KHANDVE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

Balkrishna Dnyanoba Khandve and another applied for anticipatory bail, but neither appeared in court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, pointed out that the applicants had undisclosed criminal antecedents. The intervenor highlighted several FIRs/CRs against the applicants under sections …

AAMIR CHINYA AASIR KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The applicant, Aamir Chinya Aasir Khan, sought bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and several IPC and MCOC provisions. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony, injury certificates, and seized weapons linking the applicant to the assault …

KARTIK SUNIL KOTMEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Kartik Sunil Kotme, sought enlargement of bail for a murder case (Crime No. 428 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution's case relied mainly on circumstantial evidence, including an alleged affair and a …

DIPAK DATTU GAVEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Dipak Dattu Gave, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case (C.R. No.196 of 2022) involving murder, abetment of murder, and conspiracy under IPC Sections 302, 201, 120‑B read with 34. He had been in custody for over four years and the …

LAXMAN BABAN NETKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The applicant, Laxman Baban Netke, was charged with offences under Sections 34, 376, 376(2)(n), 376(2)(f) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, with the alleged victim being his own daughter. He filed a bail …

KISHOR MOHAN KARADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by Ashwajit Anand Bagade and Kishor Mohan Karade, who were alleged to have participated in cyber‑offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(5), …

KARTIKEYA VENOD SHARMA @ KARTIK SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Kartikeya Venod Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. I-45/2019 registered for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The de facto complainant filed an affidavit stating that the dispute had been amicably settled …

KHIMA GHANSHYAMBHAI SHANKERAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, aged 22, filed an application under Section 483 of the BNSS seeking regular bail in connection with FIR C.R. No.11193034260020 of 2026 registered at Lathi Police Station, District Amreli, for offences under Sections 406, 467, 468, and 471 of the IPC/BNS. The prosecution alleged that …

SANJAYBHAI RATNABHAI DAMORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sanjaybhai Damor, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 64(2)(f) and 351(3) of the same Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant's involvement and the …

MITALBEN NIKUNJBHAI TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mitalben Nikunjbai Trivedi, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R.No.11208003250715/2025) alleging offences under Sections 420 and 120(B) of the IPC. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of …

AKASHBHAI PRADIPBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners, Akashbhai Patel and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR CR‑I‑125‑2015, which alleged kidnapping and abduction of a 17‑year‑8‑month‑old girl under IPC Sections 363 and 366 read with POCSO Sections 7 and 8. The FIR was …

RONAK S/O RAMANBHAI BHEMJIBHAI KALALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning the accused Ronak who was charged under several provisions of the Prohibition Act and the Indian Penal Code. The court examined factors such as the …

BHAVESHBHAI CHAMPAKLAL MEHTAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The applicants, Bhaveshbhai Mehta and another, sought to quash FIR No. I‑247 of 2017 alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B and 114 of the IPC relating to alleged forgery, cheating and criminal breach of trust in a lease of land for a petrol‑pump. The de‑facto complainant …

DEEPAK GULAB BHATAMBREKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Deepak Gulab Bhatambrekar, was convicted of murder and conspiracy (IPC Sections 302, 139 read with 120‑B) and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine. He filed an interim bail application, arguing that the prosecution’s case was unreliable due to the absence of independent …

SURAJ KIRAN MANDALversusKAJAL SEN SURAJ AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Suraj Kiran Mandal, challenged two orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Andheri: one forfeiting his cash bail bond, issuing a non‑bailable warrant and proclamation in a case under Section 498A IPC, and another issuing an arrest warrant and directing special police in a …

SOMABHAI HIRABHAI BAGADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

The complainant, Somabhai Hirabhai Bagada, alleged that neighbours damaged his agricultural boundary and, when he objected, a group of accused approached him armed, insulted him with caste-based slurs, and assaulted him, with one accused facilitating their escape. The trial court acquitted all …

SURBHIT MUKESHBHAI SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR filed in 2026 for alleged offences committed in 2002, including forgery of a power of attorney and related IPC offences. They argued that the alleged wrongdoing was …

AMIT MUKESHBHAI SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR filed in 2026 for alleged offences committed in 2002, including forgery of a power of attorney and related IPC offences. They argued that the alleged wrongdoing was …

VASAVDATTA ATULBHAI BHATTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, a 75‑year‑old notary and practising advocate, was arrested under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B and was granted pre‑arrest bail with condition 2‑D requiring surrender of her passport and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. She complied by depositing her …

ADITYA SACHIN VYASversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Aditya Sachin Vyas, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with an FIR alleging criminal breach of trust under Section 406 of the IPC. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence. …

THE STATE OF GUJARATversusHASMUKHRAI G RAVAL

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed a trial court’s acquittal of newspaper owner‑editor Hasmukhrai G. Raval and another accused under IPC sections 499, 500, 501, 502 and 114 for alleged defamatory publication. The trial court, after hearing witnesses and documentary evidence, found no credible proof …

ASMITABEN GHANSHYAMBHAI PAMBHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The husband and wife, Ghanshyambhai Vallabhbhai Pambhar and Asmitaben Ghanshyambhai Pambhar, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR registered at Dindoli Police Station, Surat, alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya …

GHANSHYAMBHAI VALLABHBHAI PAMBHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The husband and wife, Ghanshyambhai Vallabhbhai Pambhar and Asmitaben Ghanshyambhai Pambhar, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR registered at Dindoli Police Station, Surat, alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya …

MITHUN PRABHUDAS KHALASIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mithun Prabhudas Khalasi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11215012200047 of 2020) alleging multiple IPC offences and a violation of the …

KRUNAL SURESH PATELversusTHE UNION OF INDIA

26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

The High Court considered an application under Section 439 of the IPC for regular bail filed by Krunal Suresh Patel, a chemist employed by Megashri Agri Pharma, in connection with a special NDPS case alleging manufacture and export of ketamine disguised as Hydroxylimine Hydrochloride. The applicant …

VYANKTESH SHANTILAL PANDYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The petitioners, Vyankatesh Shantilal Pandya (deceased) and relatives, filed criminal miscellaneous applications under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR C.R.No.I‑86 of 2017 which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 34, 120‑B and 114 IPC for a purported fraudulent marriage aimed …